Preview

Another ingredient

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1336 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Another ingredient
Meat production is an issue that impacts on the environment. Some of effects that have been associated with meat are pollution, fossil fuels, and water and land consumption. In March/April of 2010 Bill McKibben published an article called “The Only Way to have a Cow” in Orion magazine. In the article, McKibben discusses the benefits of eating less meat which can result in a reduction in carbon emissions as cattle breeding has a big greenhouse effect. He believes that people should rarely eat meat or eat grass-fed beef because it would be better for the environment. He uses metaphors, imagery, and examples throughout the article to support his argument. In the beginning he uses ethos to tell us something about him as a person. Later he uses logos to tell us we should eat less meat. McKibben uses these literary techniques to make an effective argument.
The arrangement of McKibben’s article is organized and thoughtful because it is easy to read and follow. Ifi parts of the article were to be arranged differently, the article would not change its meaning because he establishes cause and effect method to prove his position. At the beginning of the second paragraph the author tells us in a straight forward manner that his argument is about “to meat or not to meat”, which has a lot of points to it. McKibben says that eating flesh is gross and a major cause of climate change through cause and effect. For example he states that “going vegan is 50 percent more effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions than switching to a hybrid car” (par. 2). This point supports his controversial point that eating less meat would benefit the environment. It leads meat-eaters to see the benefits that being vegans has, and leads them to stand on his side.
Bill McKibben is a well known environmental author and also the founder of 350.org, a campaign website on solving climate crisis. He wrote and published many books about global warming and climate change. He is also a board member

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Margaret Lundberg's essay "Eating Green" delivers the message that the way people eat is how they affect the planet. Lundberg has a very strong argument that the meat industry is the "Largest source of global warming" (Lundberg, 482) and if everyone were to become vegetarians the world be a healthier place. For everyone to become a vegetarian would be a lot to ask; however, Americans love for meat has affected the environment and the personal health of Americans.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckibben, author and environmentalist, explains why being a vegetarian is beneficial for the environment in the article "The Only Way to Have a Cow." He argues that the manufacturing of corn and beef releases harmful gasses into the atmosphere. Eating less meat would decrease the amount of those gasses and improve the environment. I believe there is some truth to what McKibben is saying but his tone is slightly like that of someone who is or thinks they are superior.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notable author, educator, and environmentalist, Bill McKibben, in his essay, “Global Warming: Get Up! Stand Up!”, argues the effects on global warming to the environment. He argues from his environmentalist experience that carbon dioxide is not only harming the ozone layer. McKibben’s purpose it to persuade readers to stand up for what they need and start a movement. He takes a defensive tone in order to inform the minds of his readers. In McKibben’s article “Global Warming: Get Up! Stand Up!” states the growing problem of global warming and urges readers to start a movement to end the problem.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mckibben begins his essay with a personal anecdote describing his trip to the vasectomy office, where he’s thrown with all these questions about having one child, and the consequences of having only one child. This shows that the essay is very personal and formal. This is also a great to catch the reader’s attention. This anecdote is used as information for the first point that McKibben’s make in the following paragraphs, “…in the last ten or 20 or 30 years, our impact has grown so much that we’re changing even those places we don’t inhabit—changing the way the weather works...” Another anecdote in the essay explains how Mckibben also on how his work on environmental issues brought up population, and the decision he is making might be good for the population. “I know that by 2050 there will be almost 50 percent more Americans (and nearly 100 percent more human beings) than there are now.” Anecdotes such as these help the reader start to think about the issue that he is bringing to the forefront. The anecdotes in this story also support his main points and ideas. The anecdotes clearly provide evidence and support for the fact that our rapid population could cause many environmental issues.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mark Bittman Summary

    • 2520 Words
    • 11 Pages

    He informs us Americans that what we are eating is killing our planet, and ourselves. The claims that he makes are displayed with pictures and statistics, and can be found accurate through research. His evidence had got me thinking about meat’s role in society, and how something as common as eating it can have a big and negative effect on the whole world. Bittman and his work are both well known worldwide; such credits makes his argument, one to agree…

    • 2520 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Only Way to Have a Cow" by Bill McKibben tries to inform humans to decrease the intake of meat eating and how this habit could harm our environment. Cow would release harmful substance like methane when they fart or belch. These actions could actually lead to a bigger problem, global warming. Turning into vegans could make environment more friendly. Eating grass fed cows are more healthy that eating corn fed cows. However another problem forms, grass fed cows are more expensive then corn fed grass which causes people with low incomes couldn't afford to eat…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hasselstrom and Regan both make valid points in their arguments by discussing the reason behind the killing of animals. In “The Cow Versus The Animal Rights Activist,” Hasselstrom tells us that the death of cattle benefits human life, and that human life is more important to protect than the life of animals. He argues, against misinformed antibeef activists, that the red meat from cows is healthy for humans. Other parts of the cow can also be used such as the fat and the hide. Although Hasselstrom provides…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the article was ending he began to try too hard to convince the reader and ended up losing the interest. He seemed to be blaming the entire world's problems on meat consumption. The problem is not eating the meat; it is how the meat is processed. Pace stated “Most of today's modernized farms have long, windowless sheds in which animals live like prisoners their entire lives” (Pace 355) He is saying that the way farms are being run now a days are destroying the environment and that is why eating meat is bad. Think back hundreds of years ago when the Native Americans used to roam North America. The animals were free, then hunted down and eaten. No one seemed to have a problem with animal consumption back then. The way to improve farms and the environment is not by not eating them, it is by changing they way they are processed. Even if most of the world decides to become a vegetarian the processing process will remain the same and the overpopulated animals will be killed the same, but this time it will go to waste because no one will eat it.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The Carnivore’s Dilemma”, an essay by Nicolette Hanh Niman, incorporates rhetorical elements, such as logos, ethos, and rhetorical questions, in an attempt to convince the audience that meat itself is not the root of global warming. Written from a rancher’s point of view, the essay relies on studies and logic to prove itself. Niman starts out with a short acknowledgement that the meat industry has a hand in the increasingly noticeable global climate change. She then quickly changes gears, stating that the studies that show the meat industry is a major player in global warming only take the prevailing methods of producing meat into account and spews facts that show the flip side of the food industry.…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vegitarian Paper

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Laura Fraser’s sense of humor completely changes the mood of the piece, and after all, when does humor not change the mood? Fraser’s comical style contradicts the seriousness of the topic to the point where the reader feels as though they are reading a personal entry rather than a dry, dull political document on the views of vegetarianism. In many occurrences, the author will ask rhetorical questions to offset what the conflict is. For example, when discussing how far utilitarianism can stretch to compensate for the negative effects, Fraser asks herself, “Wont free range do?” (548). The author fully knew that even buying and consuming free range chickens opposed her views as a vegetarian, yet she attempted to justify herself with a settlement. The use of rhetorical questions shows the amusement because vegetarians are supposed to be dedicated and committed to their anti-meat cause; however, she tries to find a hole through her reasoning. By doing so, the rhetoric adds more meaning to the essay as it reflects the misleading motives of her pro vegetarian views from the beginning. Also, Fraser uses informal phrases such as “The truth is,” (547) “It was a slippery slope from there,” (546) and “But who was I kidding?” (548). The effect such…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People tend to pay as much attention to food as they do brushing their teeth. I urge you, however, to take a step back, slow down, and really think about the food you eat. Eating is a complex thing. It may surprise you. And when you actually think about eating, you will eventually come to think about eating meat. This is no accident, meat has it's pull on humanity. And on our world. The choices we make matter. According to the best-selling author Jonathan Safran Foer, eating the meat we know "is certainly the single worst thing that humans can do to the environment"(457). Foer has been recognized by Rolling Stones Magazine and Esquire for his many accomplishments. In one of his works, "Against Meat", Foer covers the relationship of meat and…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She hook people with a quote that president Herbert Hoover promised at the intro and I think that was effective.And she gave a specific example of statistics from UN and also made a comparison with the specific example, the hybrid Toyota Prius, which is made for saving earth from the global warming. I think that helps to emphasize the practicality and excellency of having vegetarian meals. She also described how animal agriculture effect to global warming to make readers know the seriousness of the problem. Detailed facts help emphasize seriousness and make people feel more realistic about the problem. She also mentioned the other advantage beside global warming which is reducing water pollution. That can persuade people more with another good point of it. At the last paragraph, she gave a specific example of the way to get a vegetarian food to tell people it is not hard to do it. This article has been written on 2007 but I think this article still works in nowadays because the argument is still available and important issue for the…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case study from chapter 1 of Environmental Ethics for Canadians confirms Williston’s view on the ethical progress of consuming meat. His view is supported through his analysis between the relationship of eating meat and climate change, which references Regan and Singer’s perspective on animal welfarism.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau Transcendentalism

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I eat meat and quite often and don't think much of it when I do but that’s what society has done to us. We don't think what we do, we think what everyone else thinks whether its where our food comes from or for example; if we should go to college. And this is what Thoreau was trying to say, that people are far to heavily influenced and that was 160 years ago. Now there are so many ways for people to control us, from news to music to our family.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays