Preview

A Traveler's Guide to Gifts and Bribes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1820 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Traveler's Guide to Gifts and Bribes
Financial Management Policy
Professor: Ms. Gleason
A Traveler's Guide to Gifts and Bribes
Harvard Business Review

Why might bribery become a problem for U.S. managers working in foreign countries?

The FCPA was structured to help U.S. companies understand what bribery is, and what is or is not acceptable behavior at home and in other countries. The confusing issue is that even with this guidance, it is not always clear what exactly is to be considered a bribe. Under the Act, not all payments are deemed to be bribes. FCPA doesn’t forbid payments to lesser figures, it allows bribes to facilitate ongoing business activities, as there is no monetary guideline it requires companies to keep reasonable records of the transaction. Brides given to influence political decisions are banned and usually small payments that are designed to get a foreign official to perform a non-discretionary function. The distinction between the two is blurred. Confounding this is that many U.S. business people do not know what is permitted and what is not, as there is no clear guidance. As there is no clear guidance on what you can and can’t do working with foreign countries a lot of U.S. Managers could actually be offering bribes that should actually be banned. This creates no equal opportunity for everyone; the foreign company will go with whomever’s bribe seems to be greater. This will create a huge problem because this is where a lot of U.S. manger will cross the line just to win the business.
What are the major features of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)?
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) was enacted in 1977 and substantially revised in 1988. The FCPA generally prohibits corrupt payments to foreign officials. To complement this prohibition, the FCPA has accounting provisions that require maintenance of transparent and complete financial records. The Justice Department enforces the anti-bribery provisions, while the Securities and Exchange Commission has



References: Fadiman, J. A. (July-august, 1986) A Travelers Guide to Gifts and Bribes Retrieved May 3, 2011 from Harvard Business Review, Graham, J. L (Winter, 1984) The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A New Perspective Retrieved May 3, 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/pss/154278 Hart, H. (July 31, 2001) Anti-Corruption Provisions of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Retrieved May 3, 2011 from http://www.hollandhart.com/articles/FCPA.pdf Shira, D. (October 14, 2010) U.S. Business, China and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Retrieved May 4, 2011 from http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2010/10/14/u-s-business-china-and-the-foreign-corrupt-practices-act.htm Sklar, H. M. (February 07, 2011) On Facilitation Payments Retrieved May 5, 2011 from http://openairblog.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/on-facilitation-payments/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Many companies are trying to expand economically in the market by doing business with an individual or another company in foreign countries. These businesses are engaging in into using improper ways of payments that are leading to secret bribes to the foreign public officials. Foreign countries are not always in compliance with the laws and they tend not to follow them. Having these problems with the US and all the millions of dollars that have been passed they wanted to take a more affirmative approach and be able to correct the problem. That is when congress decided to introduce the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to prosecute foreign companies for corrupt payments within the United States. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is a federal law that was amended in 1977. This law “prohibits the United States from bribing foreign officials to secure advantageous contracts”(1). A foreign official is defined as any officer or employee of the foreign government or any department, agency, public international organization, or any person acting in an official for or behalf any such government or department, agency, or public international organization (2). The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was implemented for companies from the United States that are managing business in foreign countries to do so without any unethical business practices (3). This federal law consists of two provisions, the anti-bribery and the accounting/book and record provision. The first provision consists of the anti-bribery provision in which contracts with enforcing the Department of Justice. The DOJ is one of the enforcements for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in which prosecutes the issuers and their officers, employees, agents, and domestic concern all in which are acting in the US (4). The anti-bribery of FCPA prohibits anything that deals with payments or an authorization of any payment that obtains or retains with business. There are three types of improper violations for the anti-bribery…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Retrieved from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/gov/2001/eng/091801.pdf 2. Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and Related Documents, 2011,…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Corporate Counsel, As U.S. Waits for FCPA Guidance, UK Bribery Act Gets an Update, Catherine Dunn, 8/10/2012, Law.com…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Department of Justice

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There seems to be relevant laws and regulations such as Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Travel Act. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act made it unlawful to bribe officials. It was passed in 1977.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act In today’s ever changing and competitive modern world of business, it is critical for the companies to have activities internationally. In order to prohibit frauds and illegal activities, several acts and documents have been elaborated. One of the documents is Foreign Corrupt Practices Act that has been enacted in the 1970’s, as a result of SEC investigation of several U.S. companies that made illegal payments to foreign governmental officials, politicians, and political parties (Barnes 73). The FCPA had a critical impact on the way U.S. firms do business. Companies that did not comply with FCPA have been subject of criminal and civil enforcement actions that later resulted in huge fines and sentences for their officers and employees. In addition, SEC is responsible for all civil enforcement while Department of Justice is responsible for all criminal enforcement. As a consequence, firms developed specific compliance programs that helped to avoid such actions. Event though the FCPA was passed, the Congress became concerned that U.S firms were disadvantaged to foreign companies who periodically paid bribes. Therefore, after years of negotiation in 1997, United States and other thirty three countries signed the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transaction. The FCPA is enforced by Department of Justice and SEC and its violation often occur outside of the United States. Therefore, business people must be knowledgeable about all business activity, including overseas activities (“FCPA Enforcement”).…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is one legal issue contained in the ethics case regarding the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The FCPA makes it unlawful for individuals and businesses to make payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA deems these payments as bribes, which are not subject to a materiality amount. Grease payments under the FPCA are permitted as long as they are made to foreign officials in order to expedite their performance of routine duties in which they are required to…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Abstract It would be convenient to start this research paper by stating that corruption is a challenge mainly for businesses in developing countries and that it is unrelated to the current affliction of the economy in the United States. It would also be convenient to claim corruption has declined in America as a result of awareness raising campaigns and the numerous anti-corruption laws. But none of those aforementioned statements would be true. Corruption is not the exception, but rather the rule in today’s business practices. In 2004, Daniel Kaufmann, a senior fellow at Brookings Institution and former director at the World Bank, calculated an index of "legally corrupt" manifestations which is defined as the extent of undue influence through political finance influencing politicians and policy making. The United States rated in the bottom half among the 104 countries surveyed (Kaufmann, 2009). Enter Countrywide Financial Corporation, who has become synonymous with home loans in America. After a decade of enormous growth, the company ranked as the nation’s largest originator and servicer of consumer mortgages. Countrywide has also become synonymous with the mortgage meltdown, as many Countrywide borrowers have defaulted on their loans. Countrywide has harmed its shareholders and squandered its own corporate net worth on unethical practices and an unsustainable business model (Unknown, 2008). This paper will outline the act that deregulated the financial system that allowed Countrywide to act in the unethical manner they did, Countrywide’s unscrupulous tactics, Bank of America’s merger with Countrywide and inheriting burdens associated with the merger.…

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States Vs Portugal

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the article, Business corruption in the USA states, “investors in the US, and companies do not consider corruption a major obstacle to their business operations. The US offers a competitive market and abundant business opportunities.” The US government enforces the law on extortion, bribery and abuse of office.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    domestic marketing decisions of Apple’s Inc. Environmental factors such cultural differences, ethical situations, and laws such as the forging corrupt practices Act of 1977 and how it…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bribery & Corruption

    • 2086 Words
    • 9 Pages

    8 9. Spalding, A.B. (2011). Four unchartered corners of anti-corruption law: In search of remedies to the sanctioning effect. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://www.law.northwestern.edu/colloquium/international/documents/SpaldingUnchartered.pdf…

    • 2086 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: (2012, March). The extraterritorial reach of the fcpa and the uk bribery act: implications for…

    • 1710 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abstract: North American businesses seeking to participate in the global economy will quickly encounter conflicting cultural norms and values which complicate the normal rigors of competing in the marketplace. One of the more serious areas of cultural conflict for international business takes place over the issue of bribery. Whose norms should apply? “When in Rome do we do, or not do, as the Romans do?” This paper argues that bribery violates absolute moral principles which cannot be compromised, it examines the counter arguments for cultural accommodations, and suggests strategies that business persons can adopt to compete ethically in corrupt environments.…

    • 11224 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Managerial Implications

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. How important is the role of the U.S. Government Agency in this transaction in relation to the DOJ’s decision? I believe the role of the U.S. Government Agency in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Review Opinion Procedure Release 10-01, may be somewhat critical. In the case assignment, the facts and circumstances, as represented by the Requestor are legal and the Department’s conclusion to not taken any enforcement action with respect to the proposed service contract is a valid one. Although the Requestor is contractually bound to hire and compensate the individual as directed by the U.S. Government Agency. The Requestor did not play any role in selecting the individual, who was appointed by the Foreign Country based on the individual’s qualifications. The individual being hired as a Foreign Officer does not relate to the Facility and the services that the individual will provide as Facility Director are separate and apart from those performed as a Foreign Officer – the individual is being hired pursuant to an agreement between the U.S. Government Agency and the Foreign Country. The DOJ further explains its determination not to take action under the specific facts provided by the Requestor and should. In declining to take enforcement action, the Department considered the steps that the Requestor and the Foreign County have taken here to comply with the FCPA and other anti-bribery laws.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley - overview

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The follow-up to the New York Times' blockbuster scoop on Wal-Mart's alleged cover-up of $24 million in Mexican bribes has, quite rightly, focused on the company's potential Foreign Corrupt Practices Act exposure. But that's not the only law Wal-Mart and its executives should be worrying about. Sarbanes Oxley was intended…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United Kingdom Bribery Act was passed on 8 April 2010 and became effective on 1 July 2011. Until recently, international anti-corruption enforcement has been largely dominated by the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977. The mainMain difference between the (FCPA) and the (UKBA) is as follows: Both the Bribery Act and the FCPA indicate it is a crime to bribe foreign (public) officials. Under the (UKBA) “foreign public official” isare defined more narrowly than under the FCPA but still include anyone who holds a foreign legislative or judicial position. The FCPA does not cover bribery on a private level, unlike the Bribery Act, although such conduct can be caught under other US legislation. The FCPA only covers active bribery, in contrast, the (UKBA) prohibits both active and passive bribery. The (UKBA) creates a strict liability corporate offence for failure to prevent bribery (as opposed to vicarious liability) subject to being able to establish that a company has “adequate procedures”. Under the FCPA, however, a company subject to US jurisdiction can be held vicariously liable for acts of its employees and agents. The UK offence extends to acts of “associated persons” which means anyone who performs services for or on behalf of the commercial organization. An individual found to have committed an offence under the (UKBA) is liable to imprisonment of up to ten years and/or to an unlimited fine. A company found guilty is subject to an unlimited fine. For offences committed under the FCPA an individual can be fined up to US$250,000 per violation and may also be given up to five years imprisonment. A company guilty under the FCPA is liable for…

    • 767 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays