Cited: Martin Luther, Jr. “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. Why we can’t wait. N.p., 1963.Book 26 July 2013.
Cited: Martin Luther, Jr. “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. Why we can’t wait. N.p., 1963.Book 26 July 2013.
While King was giving the speech he included himself as being discriminating against. He stated some as simple as being on the bus and how he was thrown to the back because he was African American. King knew that if a person that has gone through the struggle of being treated differently, there would someone else just like him with the same struggle that would have his back. And gain supporters to stop racism, and make racism something people hate to see not join in. Martin Luther King Jr knew that non-violent protests is the way to go if you’re trying to make a…
Martin Luther King’s inspiration for writing his, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was mainly to appeal to an undeniable injustice that occurred during his time. His letter was in response tos eight white clergymen, who objected to King protesting in Birmingham. Dr. King effectively crafted his counterargument after analyzing the clergymen’s unjust proposals and then he was able to present his rebuttal. Dr. King effectively formed his counterargument by first directly addressing his audience, the clergymen and then using logos, pathos and egos to present his own perspective on his opponent’s statements.…
About individual civil rights. In the ´Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King sorts to respond to the criticism of several clergy men since he believes they are “men of genuine good will”. In respond to what they said about their actions being “unwise and untimely”. King explains their delay in action due to the occurring events, back to back. They do not wish the media to copulate their actions with the events, because they are two separate things. After that explanation, King states what brought him in Birmingham. Injustice is what brought this man to the city. King states that Birmingham is the most segregated city in America. Simply because there are brutal police incidents. Bombings of Negro properties such as homes, churches than any other city. And colored people are treated unjustly in courts. Thus with these things happening in Birmingham, King went there to get justice for the oppressed, because he believes that their individual civil rights are…
In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail”, King feels the Southern Church is unable to understand and grasp the complexity of this situation. He goes on to mention the four peaceful demonstration steps they have gone through, “collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action”(King 6). By stating this, King explains that if they just blatantly said there is racial injustice in the community, rather than peacefully protesting, there would be no gain in their goal of equality. King uses several emotional statements that are very logical regarding to the treatment of Negroes in Birmingham. He states, “We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and…
Since ancient times, promoters of justice have brought into play rhetorical strategies to persuade their opponents. On April 16, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a letter regarding the criticism several clergymen made, stating that the movements of nonviolent resistance to racism from Dr. King were “unwise and untimely”. In this letter King uses several rhetorical strategies but mainly he makes use of 3. In the first one, King uses an outside authority (Religion), given the fact that he is trying to persuade Christians. Second, Dr. King appeals to emotion (Ethos), he tries to appeal to their human and goodness side. Third, King employs analogies to emphasize his argument against racism.…
In Dr. King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” he shows that nonviolence is the way to get the positive attention that his plight deserved. He believed that to use violence was negative on a couple of points. First, violence always gets negative attention. Second, violence was the way the Klu Klux Klan went about their business. He wanted to expose unjust laws and do it in a fashion that conveyed his beliefs without causing other problems. In Dr. King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” he is trying to convince his “fellow clergymen” (566) that his fight for the civil liberties is a just one, and that the march was a nonviolent one and one that was surely needed. Dr. King stated, “we are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny” (566). King is saying that it’s something that can no longer be ignored, that he can no longer sit on the sideline and be an idle observer. The black man has to take it to the streets. In this letter, Dr. King showed that nonviolence, direct action, and the ability to stand by one’s convictions are the right path.…
Dr. King also references St. Augustine who said "an unjust law is no law at all," (King 334). Dr. King also appeals to logos by comparing his disobedience to segregation laws to the rebellion at the Boston Tea Party. This historical allusion gives his claims credit and defend his thinking. Dr. King also uses pathos by describing the torment that many African American people have to go through on a daily basis due to racism and segregation laws. King states that they are "humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading 'white' and 'colored'," (King 334). Dr. King defends the protests by explaining why the segregation laws must be overturned and why things need to change soon. He states how African American people are disrespected and "living constantly at tiptoe stance," (King 334). He also describes how many African American people are constantly plagued by fear and hatred and that they feel no worth in society. Through his use of ethos, pathos, and logos Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. effectively explains and defends his actions. He also justifies anyone else who would like to be treated equally in society and would like to protest in a nonviolent…
King, however, didn’t advocate citizens transcending the law, but rather, Dr. King believed that in order to remedy injustice in society, people must openly break the unjust law and accept punishment in showing “highest respect for the law”(King p.23). In a rather interesting yet extreme example, King relates civil disobedience to the Holocaust: “It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. But I am sure that, if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. If I lived in a communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I believe I would openly advocate disobeying these anti-religious laws”(King p.23). King cites such an example to bring out the visceral reaction of the audience, given the Holocaust’s widespread negative publicity and condemnation. Thus, King manipulates the reader’s emotions to bring them on board with the idea of civil disobedience. No one would dare question the rectitude of aiding a helpless Jew. King attempts direct the same negative connotation of the Holocaust to segregation in the U.S. to fight injustice in…
In Document 28-2, Marin Luther King Jr. calls out a group of white clergymen for their statement that called the present activities of demonstrations “unwise and untimely”. King felt the men were of genuine good will and their criticisms were sincerely set forth and he wanted to answer their statement in patient and reasonable terms. The white clergymen said argued Kings being in Birmingham as “outsiders coming in” and he wanted to defend his reason for being there. King was the president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, an organization operating in every southern state. The headquarters of the organization was in Atlanta, Georgia. He goes on to say that the reason I am in Birmingham is because injustice is here and injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Birmingham is probably the most segregated city in the United States and has an ugly record of police brutality. The city of Birmingham’s treatment towards Negroes is unjust and unfair. There have been more unsolved violent crimes towards blacks in Birmingham then in any other city of the United States. He ask the clergymen why this cannot be settled with negotiation because that is clearly a better path then to as what is…
King states the ways the protests were handled emphasizing the unfairness of the monitoring. For example, he mentions the angry violent dogs that aggressively bite and attack six unarmed, nonviolent negroes. Secondly, the claim that the supposedly “break” such laws is emphasized by King claiming the reasons for this action. He declares that there are two types of laws. The ones that should be followed and the ones that are to morally wrong that they should not be followed; the just laws and the unjust laws. the segregation laws, for example, are unjust laws.…
For instance, King compared the difference between the just laws and the unjust laws to explain for his willingness to break laws: “An unjust law is a code … be considered democratically structured?” Here, King pointed out that the act of segregation was considered unjust because it was not democratically structured. Also, he believed that the laws could only be just when everyone was willing to follow it and it should be considered by all not just by the white society. In other words, by using the facts, King made a strong and convincing argument against the government, which supported the segregation law as a just law. Furthermore, King continued with his logic in saying that such unjust laws should not be preserved by using moral means: “So I have tried to make … right deed for the wrong reason.” Although King agreed that Mr. Connor and the policemen were doing the right thing in ending the protest in a nonviolent way, he pointed out it was ironic that they were in fact protecting an immoral end or injustice. In fact, King asked the clergymen to look outside for the true cause of his protest, which was to end the injustice in Birmingham, rather than commend the police for their good actions in preserving a wrongdoing.…
Throughout the entirety of this essay, King pleads with the community and society as a whole to stand back and look at the situation he finds himself in. A society that is crutched by the injustice of segregation. Weakened by the laws that are established in places such as Birmingham. Beaten down by the commonality of police brutality to the African American man and women. A society that is far from the ideals of “all men are created equal”. King writes this essay to persuade individuals to change their thinking, or change their actions. He lays out what he thinks of society, and where it should go. He identifies misconceptions people have and how actions need to be taken. Martin Luther King Jr. Realizes heavily on public reason in hopes that they will understand his point of view and polarize their thinking in his direction. Only then, can a society be built on true justice and morality.…
“I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. … Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds.” This passage is an excerpt from “Letter from Birmingham Jail” written by Martin Luther King Jr. on April 16, 1963. Although this actual letter is addressed to fellow clergymen, King adopts a level-headed passionate tone to appeal to the hearts and minds of a national audience to end racism and injustice everywhere.…
For this proposal I will look at three arguments from the opposing side and analyze to see where are paths cross. The three arguments come from Jeff flake, John Kasich, and Ron DeSantis. They all have valid opposing arguments on my subject immigration. I am on the side of getting immigration reform. I believe we should allow fair and fairly simple access to our country because most people are just seeking better lives. I will also analyze my own arguments to see where I might confuse people, fail to make the point, or trigger the backfire effect. The backfire effect is when someone’s beliefs actually get stronger from your argument.…
Typically, arguments spawn from contrasting viewpoints over minor/major subjects or conflicts. These arguments often become messy and lead to even messier outcomes, resulting in damaged relations between the disputants. A solution to this, is The Rogerian Method. Created by Psychologist, Carl Rogers, The Rogerian Method is a form of argumentation created on his principle that people should not argue until they fairly acknowledge the opponent’s side in order to create a civil and unbiased argument. The four main components of Rogerian being, introducing the argument, establishing context, stating the author’s position, and any benefits to the opponent. This style of argumentation is generally used to establish a middle ground in which two disagreeing…