Preview

A Review of justice in Plato

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1668 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Review of justice in Plato
A brief Review of justice, Plato’s Republic
It is the 5th century BC, in ancient Greece specifically the city state of Athens, it is here were a man commonly known as Plato (true name Aristocles) begins to write brilliant philosophical dialogues, sparked by the state mandated execution of his teacher Socrates. It was in this moment Plato etched his name in to the physique of humanity, as one of the greatest philosophers in history, it was at a midpoint of his career when he wrote what is arguably his greatest work The Republic; this will be our subject of Review. In the Republic Plato (Aristocles) uses the character of Socrates to put forth a grand conceptualization of a just and virtuous society a (utopia) were justice ensures good order and prosperity the Polis or city. He presents these ideas in the form of a progressive narrative which begins as a conversation about the nature of justice. As such in this paper will concentrate on reviewing and analyzing his ideas and his conclusion on what justice is. In order to do so we must identify what that conclusion was, Plato sums this up in one line of the republic as (443p) “justice is for each man to do his duty.” Now considering the tremendous scope and breath of this book, we will Review this primary train of thought and for the sake of brevity negate some of the secondary themes
In Plato’s Republic, the narrative begins when Socrates and his companion Glaucon are returning from the festival of the goddess Benddis and, are intercepted by a group, led by a Thrasymachus whom coaxes them to join them at his house; it is there where they are joined by Polemercus (a sophist) and Adimantus. Shortly thereafter ignites a debate on the nature of justice, the guests propose several definitions and examples of what they think justice is, nevertheless upon dissection these are shown to be unsatisfactory. In response to a notion proposed by Thrasymachus that injustice is more advantageous for the individual than justice,



Cited: 1. Peter Adamson historu of philosophy without any gaps podcast Ep 25. Soul and the City: Plato 's Political Philosophy http://www.historyofphilosophy.net/ 2. Catholic University of America Dr. Tobias Hoffman Platos republic class notes http://faculty.cua.edu/hoffmann/courses/201_1068/Plato-5%20Republic.4.pdf 3. Notre Dame on line philosophical reviews http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/25625-understanding-plato-s-republic-2 4. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of maintaining social and political stability and order for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat conflicting (if not unintended biased) perspective. These concepts of thought originate in a hierarchical group of knowledge: understanding, thought, belief, and imagination (Socrates 511e); most of which we use for measuring the ideal implementation of practical and critical forms of theory. What we portray justice in the United States today mostly consists of both opinionated…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper argues that Socrates does not successfully refute Thrasymachus’s argument about justice in The Republic. In Book I, Socrates attempts to refute Thrasymachus point about the craftsmen analogy in regards to Thrasymachus’s argument. Socrates argues that every craft seeks the advantage of what it rules over and not its own advantage. (342c) He further goes into this idea of how competition doesn’t exist between people in the same craft.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was an interesting individual, and has always been one of my favorite Philosophers. I personally like most of his political ideals, and find them almost in alignment with my own. In particular I like his reasoning when it comes to the citizens that make up the city-state, along with the leadership. So throughout this essay I plan on drawing from the Republic to talk more about this Philosopher’s ideas.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Socrates is asked to defend justice on its own, but not for the reputation that it brings, he suggests that justice should be found in the city before starting to use the analogy of finding it in an individual. He then uses an example of a just city that aims at satisfying the basic human wants. Some citizens enter into political welfare as no one is independent. Nevertheless,…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a man was not subjected to law or punishment would he choose to do what is considered just? In Plato’s The Republic, Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students, states a common view on justice. Justice is simply a lesser evil when compared to the two extremes which are suffering injustice without power to retaliate and doing injustice without suffering consequences. According to Glaucon, all men are inherently unjust, and only do what is just when forced to do so by law. This view of justice can be seen throughout history when leaders, like Nero, do unjust actions for their own personal gain simply because they are free from any consequences.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Republic begins with a debate on the subject of morality. One by one, Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymachus put forth their definitions of morality and one by one, they come up short. None survive the merciless scrutiny of the author’s mentor, Socrates.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    How is it that Thrasymachus can be so eager to speak against justice, claiming that justice is for fools since the just life ultimately does not pay off compared to the unjust life, which is full of exploitation and oppression of the weak; But from his original argument, Thrasymachus describes justice as the advantage of the stronger party. This inconsistency reveals that even though Thrasymachus himself denies this in his speech, he himself does have an understanding of the common good that is shared in society of some underlying values or ideas of what justice is. Therefore, I as the reader, become to realize that even though Thrasymachus might portray himself as a wise and eloquent speaker, he is not as wise as he believes. From this inconsistency, Thrasymachus appears to be more concerned with the articulation in his rhetoric and the defeat of Socrates, than actually contributing to the discussion and actually finding the true meaning of…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus once said, “It doesn’t pay to be just”. Ever since the ancient Greek times people have been in search for the perfect meaning of justice. Some have come up with a good definition but even then, there still remains a point to argue proving that the definition incorrect. In Plato’s Republic he starts off with book one, a discussion on what justice is through Socrates. Throughout book one, Socrates argues with Cephalus, Polemarcus and Thrasymachus on why their definition of justice is incorrect. Through the arguments he provides examples as to why people might disagree with the definition. Through the conversation Socrates has with the men Plato proves a connection to his book seven the allegory of the cave. The allegory of the cave is based on how people on only so educated on the area around them because that’s what they grew into. While Dr. Tom Brickhouse, provided a lecture on how to understand Plato’s Republic. Even today people still argue on the true meaning of justice but ones understanding of justice can be is only so because you only know what you have seen and heard.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s theory of justice is about equality and that one deserves punishment if they do commit an unjust action. During the Crito, Socrates tries to correct a lot of points that Crito is trying to argue with him about, what it means to be justice. To be justice, means a human being that does good based on the laws that are emplaced according to the state. Good people according to Socrates are only worth considering. People that do good are considered moral people, and have opinions that should be regarded because their inputs are considered to be ethically correct. Being a human of ethical virtues means that they must not do wrong. Anything that is immoral, is considered immoral. We as humans may not intervene in activities that deem to be…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato Justice

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plato’s Republic, is a classic philosophical novel that covers many points and topics regarding philosophy, one of the main points includes justice. In this essay I will be answering the question of whether justice in the soul is choice worthy for its own sake. While this topic is quite complex, I will use a mixture of personal analysis as well as evidence from the book itself to assert that justice in the soul is the best choice for its own sake. In the following paragraphs I will discuss what justice in the soul is, why justice in the soul is choice worthy and lastly to what extent this choice entails.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Aristotle, arguably the most important philosophers of their time, both made attempts to define justice. Being that Aristotle was a student of Plato, their ideas share many similarities. Both viewed justice as the harmonious interaction of people in a society. However, Plato defined his ideal of justice with more usage of metaphysics, invoking his Form of the Good, while Aristotle took a more practical approach, speaking in terms of money and balance. Although Aristotle's ideal of justice may seem superior, upon further inspection, Plato's ideal of justice is the stronger.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics