A review of Empowermet Evaluation

Powerful Essays
Topics: Evaluation
1.0 Introduction
The various paradigms of Evaluation available in Literature possess an inherent potential generate confusion, debate and tension. It also holds the potential of strengthening debate and stretching the limits of the intellectual discourse on this engaging and all-important specialty of development-focused studies.
Among the plethora of approaches in the “science of evaluation” is Empowerment Evaluation which has been selected as the topical focus of this assignment. I intend to critically review this approach by presenting the definitions of the approach, its history, theoretical influences, practical facts on implementing an evaluation study using the Empowerment Evaluation Framework as well as consider some real-life examples of its application to a program as well as review documented intellectual criticisms of the approach.
2.0 Background to Empowerment Evaluation
1.1 Definitions
According to Guba & Lincoln (2001), “Evaluation is one of the three basic forms of disciplined inquiry, the others being research and policy analysis”. The authors equally posit that “it is that form of inquiry whose focus is on the evaluand (program, process, organization, person, etc.) and which results in “merit” and/or “worth” constructions (judgments) about such evaluand” (Guba & Lincoln, 2001).
Among the various known approaches that have been widely discussed in literature is EMPOWERMENT EVALUATION. It has been classified as one of the manifested strands of the Participatory/Empowerment tradition of Evaluation research.(General Principles and Paradigms of Monitoring & Evaluation, 2014)
Empowerment evaluation (EE) is an evaluation approach is designed to help communities monitor and evaluate their own performance. It is used in comprehensive community initiatives as well as small-scale settings and is designed to help groups accomplish their goals. (Wikipedia, 2014). Based on the widely accepted definition of its proponent - David Fetterman - "Empowerment



References: Chelminsky, E. (2007). The coming transformation in Evaluation. In E. Chelminsky & W. Shadish (Eds), Evaluation for the 21st Century: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage publications Czuba, C Fetterman & Wandersman (2007): Empowerment Evaluation: Yesterday, Today and Tommorrow. American Journal of Evaluation 2007: 28;179 Fetterman, D.M Miller RL and Campbell R.(2006): Taking Stock of Empowerment Evaluation: An Empirical Review American Journal of Evaluation 2006 27: 296 Rodríguez-Campos, L Wikipedia (2014): Empowerment evaluation; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empowerment_evaluation. Accessed 12th February, 2014 Zimmermann, M.A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    strategists systematically review, evaluate, and control the execution of strategies. Chapter 9 presents a framework that can guide managers’ efforts to evaluate strategic-management activities, to make sure they are working, and to make timely changes. Computer information systems being used to evaluate strategies are discussed. Guidelines are presented for formulating, implementing, and evaluating strategies. I. THE NATURE OF STRATEGY EVALUATION A. Importance of Strategy Evaluation 1. The strategic-management…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Post-Negotiation – Review and Evaluation Opening position Proposed by Management  Written request by Union  Reasonable notice must be given  Leave of absence will be granted without pay  Up to 2 employees for one day  Leave of absence days may not exceed 10 days off  Leave of Absence granted solely for the purpose of carrying out business for the Local Opening Position Proposed by Union  Leave of absence with pay up to 2 employees;  5 days with pay, and  12 unpaid, a total of 17 aggregated…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PERT is a widely used method for planning and coordinating large-scale projects. To obtain: • A graphical display of project activities. • An estimate of how long the project will take. • An indication of which activities are the most critical to timely project completion. • An indication of how long any activity can be delayed without delaying the project. The Network Diagram Network (precedence) diagram -Diagram of project activities that shows sequential relationships by the use of…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Grant Review and Evaluation Armelia Bailey BSHS/452 August 5, 2012 Instructor: Vanessa Sablar Grant Review and Evaluation Nonprofit organizations prepare grant proposals based on the eligibility requirements, and guidelines set forth by grantors to fund various programs. The key to winning grants is to ensure the proposal includes important information about the program goals and objectives, the organizational background, and community needs among other factors. If the organization is not…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Grant Review and Evaluation BSHS/452 Instructor Rick Bazant University of Phoenix (Axia) November 25, 2013 Critique Sheet On: The Behavioral Organization Community Resource Center from Team A Group Assignment Credibility Component Credibility of organization is established Directors of organization and appropriate personnel are identified. Contact person is established as well as preferred forms of contact. Target Population stated. Need Component…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peer Review Summary/ Self-Evaluation The student composed a clear and focused essay. The introduction was focused on the idea that everyone has a writer inside, and the possibility that it’s due to how events in our lives affect us. The author proposes that one can possibly decipher memories into words. This essay was well organized with an arrangement of memories of a dreadful event, for example “The last memory of my father, who was like a hero in my eyes, was of him lying peacefully…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE (PERT) Category: Planning/ Monitoring - Control ABSTRACT Program (Project) Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)(G) is a project management tool used to schedule, organize, and coordinate tasks within a project. It is basically a method to analyze the tasks involved in completing a given project, especially the time needed to complete each task, and to identify the minimum time needed to complete the total project. PERT planning involves the following…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE (PERT) Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is a scheduling method originally designed to plan a manufacturing project by employing a network of interrelated activities, coordinating optimum cost and time criteria. PERT emphasizes the relationship between the time each activity takes, the costs associated with each phase, and the resulting time and cost for the anticipated completion of the entire project. PERT is an integrated project management…

    • 6941 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    evaluation

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    attendance. It will also help you measure the effectiveness of relevant policies, processes and procedures, and the effectiveness of the plan itself. Your attendance plan should form an integral part of your school’s broader planning and self-review. These guidelines for managing attendance are for boards of trustees, principals and teachers. They will help your school: • focus on student attendance as a foundation forstudent engagement and achievement • develop and implement a robust…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    evaluation

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evaluation is more subjective, since it involves human judgment. We make evaluations of people and their performance not only in school, but also on the job and at home. As teachers, we strive to reduce the chance for misjudgment in the evaluation of students Reasons for evaluation According to Robert Slavin there are five reasons for evaluation and these are: 1.) Motivation of students – rewards for good work can stimulate further good work. 2.) Feedback to students- evaluation can reveal strengths…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays