Henry “Hal” McVey wrote a comprehensive article on the importance of industrial minerals in a typical first-world person’s life. I say first-world because not every single person in the entire world could relate to what he calls “a normal working day”. A working person in the Philippines could probably identify with some but not in all the routines. Nevertheless, McVey was successful in putting into light the many uses of non-metallic minerals in our everyday lives. He succeeded in providing a “broad insight into the importance of industrial minerals in our everyday life.” He did a great job in emphasizing “how much our lives would be altered without ready and economical access to these fundamental constituents.” Indirectly, Mr. McVey is saying that mining is important because our lives depend much on minerals.
In addition to what he has cited, may I add that pregnant women must have an ample supply of minerals such as iron, calcium, and magnesium to ensure the optimum growth of their babies. Only, these minerals can only be accessed through food. The kinds of minerals which he cited in his paper can only be collected through mining.
Yes, I agree with Mr. McVey. Mining is important and necessary. There is no other activity known to man that would enable him to extract precious minerals from the earth’s core. It is as indispensable as the minerals themselves. However, every mining activity has its costs. Most often than not, the environmental cost outweighs the benefits. These are the costs which Mr. McVey failed to include in his paper if he wanted to present a balance picture of mining. Countless scenarios have been cited to create an image of the evils of mining. There is water pollution, habitat destruction, loss of biodiversity, human displacement, and other negative environmental impact.
In the Philippines, there are non-governmental groups which clamor for a moratorium on all mining activities in the country. According to the Catholic...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document