Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43 (2005) 189–208
A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development Damjan Krajnc, Peter Glaviˇ ∗ c
Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, PO Box 219, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia Received 8 December 2003; accepted 8 June 2004
Abstract The focus of the paper is on consideration of how to use indicators to monitor sustainable development in a relevant and useful manner. Integrated information on sustainable development of a company is very essential for decision-making since it is very difﬁcult to evaluate the performance of the company on the ground of too many indicators. The objective of the work was to design a model for obtaining a composite sustainable development index (ICSD ) in order to track integrated information on economic, environmental, and social performance of the company with time. Normalized indicators were associated into three sustainability sub-indices and ﬁnally composed into an overall indicator of a company performance. This was applied by determining the impact of individual indicator to the overall sustainability of a company using the concept of analytic hierarchy process. The demonstration of the model used data for a case study company, Henkel, and a set of sustainable development indicators that were classiﬁed using the currently most widely accepted approach of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Case study was used to measure ICSD and sustainability sub-indices of the company over the time interval of 6 years. Interpretation of results is given and the utility of ICSD with its relevance for decision-making is pointed out. Using a case study, the paper demonAbbreviations: AHP, analytic hierarchy process; AIChE, American Institute of Chemical Engineers; COD, chemical oxygen demand; CWRT, Center for Waste Reduction Technologies; EMAS, eco-management and auditing scheme; EUR, euro; GRI, Global Reporting Initiative; IChemE, Institution of Chemical Engineers; ISO, International Organization for Standardization; SD, sustainable development; UP, unit of production; VOC, volatile organic compound; WBCSD, World Business Council for Sustainable Development; WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +386 2 229 44 51; fax: +386 2 252 77 74. E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org (P. Glaviˇ ). c 0921-3449/$ – see front matter © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002
D. Krajnc, P. Glaviˇ / Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43 (2005) 189–208 c
strates that the model can be applied to deliver composite indicators of sustainability performance of companies. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Sustainable development; Sustainability indicators; Composite index; Sustainability assessment; Multiattribute decision-making
1. Introduction Sustainable development (SD) is the concept that plays important role in business and industry of the 21st century. Industry sector is responsible for appreciable material ﬂows within human society as well as the exchange of material and energy with the environment.
Nomenclature Symbols + IA indicator whose increasing value has positive impact in the perspective of sustainability − IA indicator whose increasing value has negative impact in the perspective of sustainability + IA average value of indicator with positive impact in the period selected − IA average value of indicator with negative impact in the period selected composite sustainable development index ICSP + Imin indicator with minimum value and positive impact on the sustainability − Imin indicator with minimum value and negative impact on the sustainability + Imax indicator with maximum value and positive impact on the sustainability − indicator with maximum value and negative impact on the sustainability Imax + IN normalized indicator whose increasing value has positive impact on the sustainability − IN...
References: AIChE. Center for Waste Reduction Technologies (CWRT). Focus Area: Sustainability Metrics. Available at: http://www.aiche.org/cwrt/pdf/BaselineMetrics.pdf, 2004. Azapagic A. Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. J Cleaner Prod 2004;12:639–62. Azapagic A, Perdan S. Indicators of sustainable development for industry: a general framework. Trans IChemE (Proc Safety Envir Prot) Part B 2000;78(4):243–61. Daly H, Cobb J. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston, MA, USA: Beacon Press; 1989. DJSI-Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes. Dow Jones Sustainability World Indexes Guide, Version 5.0. Available at: http://www.sustainability-index.com, 2003. GRI-Global Reporting Initiative. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines 2002 on Economic, Environmental and Social Performance. Global Reporting Initiative, Boston, USA. Available at: http://www.globalreporting.org, 2002. Hafeez K, Zhang Y, Malak N. Determining key capabilities of a ﬁrm using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 2002;76:39–51. Henkel. Sustainability Report 2003. Available at: http://www.she.henkel.com/, 2003. IChemE. Sustainable Development Progress Metrics Recommended for use in the Process Industries. Available at: http://www.icheme.org/sustainability/metrics.pdf, 2004. ISO. Quantities and Units, ISO Standards Handbook. Gen` ve: International Organization for Standardization, e 1993. JRC – Joint Research Center. Internal Market Index 2002: Technical Details of the Methodology. Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Technological and Economic Risk Management. Applied Statistics Group. Available at: http://www.jrc.cec.eu.int/, 2002. Krajnc D, Glaviˇ P. Indicators of sustainable production. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2003;5:279–88. c Murray CJL, Lauer J, Tandon A, Frenk J. Overall health system achievement for 191 countries. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper Series: No. 28. World Health Organization (WHO). Available at: http://www3.who.int/whosis/discussion papers/pdf/paper28.pdf, 2001.
D. Krajnc, P. Glaviˇ / Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43 (2005) 189–208 c
OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Corporate Responsibility, Private Initiatives and Public Goals. Paris, France: OECD Publications, 2001. OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. An Update of the OECD Composite Leading Indicators. Short-term Economic Statistics Division, Statistics Directorate/OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd.org, 2002. Pr´ Consultants. The Eco-indicator 99 – a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology e Report. Available at: http://www.pre.nl/, 2001. Saaty TL. Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980. Seljak J. Sustainable Development Indicators (in Slovenian language, abstract in English). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Institute of Macroeconomic Analysis and Development (IMAD), 2001. Sikdar SK. Sustainable development and sustainability metrics. AIChE J 2003;49(8):1928–32. Statistics Finland. Index of Environmental Friendliness. Available at: http://www.stat.ﬁ/tk/yr/ye22 en.html, 2003. UNDP – United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/, various years, 1990–2003. Veleva V, Ellenbecker M. Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. J Cleaner Prod 2001;9:519–49. WBCSD – World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Signals of Change: Business Progress Toward sustainable Development. Gen` ve, Switzerland, 1997. e WEF – World Economic Forum. An Initiative of the Global Leaders of Tomorrow Environment Task Force. Annual Meeting 2002. Pilot Environmental Performance Index. Available at: http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/ indicators/ESI/EPI2002 11FEB02.pdf, 2002.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document