A FRAMEWORK FOR COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGIC ANALYSIS
ANTHONY E. BOARDMAN
Van Dusen Professor of Strategy
Faculty of Commerce
University of British Columbia
AIDAN R. VINING
CNABS Professor of Business & Government Relations
Faculty of Business Administration
Simon Fraser University
June 10, 2003
INTRODUCTION: THE STRATEGIC ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK
This paper presents the basic framework for comprehensive strategic analysis. The basic purpose of strategic analysis is to help analyze how the firm can generate returns in excess of the firm’s opportunity costs (these are rents) by engaging in a more effective corporate strategy and, at the business level, more effective competitive strategy (Porter, 1996). The framework describes and briefly explains the major components of a strategic analysis, and outlines the major components of strategic analysis and the order they should be covered in a project write-up.
It consists, therefore, of a coherent “skeleton” of a comprehensive strategic
analysis. Of course, it is only a generic guide. A project should be adapted to the specific needs (i.e., the project specification) of the client. Corporate-level analysis for firms with multiple business units is more complex than an analysis of firms in a single line of business. Some projects are more oriented to an industry analysis (a potential client for this type of analysis might be a firm considering entering the industry). Other projects are essentially analysis of entry into a new market or (new) business plans (see business plan power point slides). The logic of a comprehensive strategic analysis is simple: describe and explain the issue/problem, assess it, try to solve it. Of course, we actually analyze p roblems in a much more nonlinear manner than this in practice, but writing-up a n analysis in this linear, “rational” mode is the only way to make the analysis understandable to the client.
Therefore, usually, a written
comprehensive strategic analysis contains three major parts, in the following order: analysis of the current situation, assessment of the current situation (fulcrum) and solution analysis. Analysis of the Current Situation
T he purpose of the current situation analysis is to provide a “snapshot” of the issue/problem and of the firm. Here some of the important questions normally addressed are: What is the issue/problem? Who owns and/or controls the firm? What has been the recent history of the firm? What business, or businesses, is the focal firm in? What are the focal firm’s products in each business? What are the customer segments in each business? What is the structure and dynamics of each industry that the firm competes and how competitive are they? What changes are taking place in the industry, or industries, that will affect the focal firm specifically and/or industry profitability over the next few
years? How does the firm compete at the product or business level? What are the firm’s internal sources of competitive advantage/disadvantage? What is the focal firm’s current strategy? How well is the firm performing from a financial perspective?
Assessment of Current Situation (the Fulcrum)
T he purpose of the fulcrum is to synthesize the current situation analysis into an assessment of current and future expected performance. It should also consider the broad direction of a new strategic initiative, if the status quo is sub-optimal. The important questions here are: How well is the focal firm performing from a broad strategic perspective? Is the current strategy highly successful, successful, inadequate or disastrous? What is predicted to happen to overall performance if the existing strategy continues? If the strategy is not successful, what is the source, or sources, of the problem? In which broad strategic direction should the firm move? When dealing with these issues, the analyst also needs to think ahead: what type of choice method will be used to evaluate the...
References: Agarwal, Rajshree and Michael Gort, First-Mover Advantage and the Speed of Competitive Entry,”
Journal of Law and Economics, 4 4(1): 161-177, 2001
20(4): 413-427, 1994.
Andrade, Gregor, Mark Mitchell and Erik Stafford, “New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers,”
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1 5(2): 103-120, 2001.
Argote, Linda, “Organizational Learning Curves: Persistence, Transfer and Turnover,” International
Journal of Technology Management, 11(7/8): 759-70, 1996.
Auty, Susan and Geoff Easton, “Patterns of Competition: A Study of Local Restaurants,” Marketing
Intelligence & Planning, 8(1): 27-34, 1990.
Banker, Rajiv D., His-Hui Chang and Sumit K. Majumber, “A Framework for Analyzing Changes in
Strategic Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 1 7(9): 693-712, 1996.
Benjamin, Robert and Rolf Wigand, “Electronic Markets and Virtual Value Chains on the
Information Superhighway,” Sloan Management Review, 3 6(2): 62-72, 1995.
Bergen, Mark and Margaret A. Peteraf, “Competitor Identification and Competitor Analysis: A
Broad-Based Managerial Approach,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(4/5): 157-169, 2002.
Boardman, Anthony E. and Aidan R. Vining, “Using Service-Customer Matrices in Strategy Analysis
of Nonprofits,” Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 1 0(4): 397-420, 2000.
Boardman, Anthony E. and Aidan R. Vining, “Defining Your Business Using Product-Customer
Matrices,” L ong Range Planning, 2 9(1): 38-48, 1996.
Competence-based Competition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
Brickley, James A., Clifford W. Smith and Jerold L. Zimmerman, Managerial Economics and
Organizational Architecture, New York: Irwin, 1996.
Capon, Noel, John U. Farley and Scott Hoenig, “Determinants of Financial Performance: A MetaAnalysis,” Management Science, 3 6(10): 1143-1159, 1990.
Carlson, John A. and William C. Dunkelberg, “Market Perceptions and Inventory-Price-Employment
Plans,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 7 1(2): 318-24, 1989.
Christensen, Clayton M., “The Past and Future of Competitive Advantage,” MIT Sloan Management
Review, 4 2(2): 105-109, 2001.
Collis, David J., “A Resource-Based Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings
Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, 12: 49-68, 1991.
Collis, David J., “Corporate Strategy in Multibusiness Firms,” L ong Range Planning, 29(3): 416-9,
Cool, Karen and James Henderson, “Power and Firm Profitability in Supply Chains: French
Manufacturing Industry in 1993,” Strategic Management Journal, 1 9(10): 909-26, 1998.
Cubbin John S., Market Structure and Performance-The Empirical Evidence, London: Harwood
Academic Publishers, 1988.
Da Silveira, Giovani, Denis Borenstein and Flavio Fogliatto, “Mass Customization: Literature Review
and Research Directions,” International Journal of Production Economics, 71(1): 1-13, 2001.
Daems, Herman and Howard Thomas (eds.), Strategic Groups, Strategic Moves and Performance,
New York: Pergamon, 1994.
Duncan, W. Jack, Peter M. Ginter and Linda E. Swayne, “Competitive Advantage and Internal
Organizational Assessment,” Academy of Management Executive, 12(3): 6-16, 1998.
Manufacturing Industries,” Rand Journal of Economics, 1 9(4): 495-515, 1988.
Easton, Allan, Complex Managerial Decisions Involving Multiple Objectives, New York: John Wiley
& Sons, 1973.
Virginia, Working Paper 01-07, 2001; available electronically from SSRNEPC,
Fahey, Liam, “Competitor Scenarios: Projecting a Rival’s Marketplace Strategy,” Competitive
Intelligence Review, 1 0(2): 65-85, 1999.
Fahey, Liam and V. K. Narayanan, Macroenvironmental Analysis for Strategic Planning, St Paul,
Minn: West Publishing, 1986.
Fahey, Liam and Robert M. Randall (eds.), Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight
Scenarios, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
Fridson, Martin S. and Fernando Alverez, Financial Statement Analysis: A Practitioner’s Guide, New
York: Wiley, 2002.
Dynamics,” European Management Journal, 1 8(6): 619-637, 2000.
Geroski, Paul A., “Early Warning of New Rivals,” Sloan Management Review, 4 0(3): 107-17, 1999.
Goold, Michael and Kathleen Luchs, “Why Diversify? Four Decades of Management Thinking,”
Academy of Management Executive, 7(3): 7-25, 1993.
Gordon, Mary E. and George R. Milne, “Selecting the Dimensions that Define Strategic Groups: A
Novel Market-Driven Approach,” Journal of Managerial Issues, 1 1(2): 213-233, 1999.
Graham, John R., Michael L. Lemmon and Jack G. Wolf, “Does Corporate Diversification Destroy
Value?” Journal of Finance, 5 7(2): 695-720, 2002.
Grant, Robert, M., Contemporary Strategy Analysis, ( 4 th . Ed.), Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers,
Hammond, John. Ralph Keeney and Howard Raiffa, Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making
Better Decisions, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1999,
Hansmann, Henry, The Ownership Of Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press, 1996.
Hardin, Steve, “Hal Varian: Six Forces Shaping the Network Economy,” Bulletin of the American
Society for Information Science, 25(2), 1999, 16-19.
Hax, Arnoldo C. and Nicolas S. Majluf, Strategic Management: An Integrative Perspective,
Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
Hennart, Jean-Francois, “A Transaction Cost Theory of Equity Joint Ventures,” Strategic
Management Journal, 9 (4): 361-74, 1988.
Hyland David C. and J. David Diltz, “Why Firms Diversify: An Empirical Examination,” Financial
Management, 3 1(1): 51-81, 2002.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document