Preview

A. Explain Why the House of Lords Rejected the 1909 Budget.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
619 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A. Explain Why the House of Lords Rejected the 1909 Budget.
The House of Lords in 1909 consisted mainly of aristocrats that where part of the conservative party. There are many different reasons for the rejection of the people’s budget, which was an idea, brought forward by David Lloyd George of the Liberal party. The swift rejection by the House of Lords sparked the first constitutional crisis of the 20th century.
The first reason I am going to bring forward is that this new budget included the idea of taxation on the rich for money that would go to support the poor. A position in the House of Lords was inherited; this meant that the peers in the House of Lords were all relations with inherited wealth. This meant that the people the Budget targeted included the peers in the House of Lords; they did not feel it was fair to have their money taxed of them and saw it as an attack on them by the Liberals. So they rejected this budget so they wouldn’t be taxed. The peers believed that this budget was unfair on them ‘These (land) taxes are justifiable if you believe that land is national property’ however they did not believe this, they believed that the land they owned was theirs and no one should be able to take it from them as, that, they said could be seen as stealing- therefore they had hostility towards the new budget. This budget not only taxed them directly but indirectly to, David Lloyd George also wanted to put taxes on luxury goods such as motor cars and beer. This luxury goods tax also hit the wealthy; they didn’t think the poor should be getting their money because they thought the lower class were poor because they were lazy (they believed in self-help), therefore they did not think the lower classes deserved to be given their money because they were not doing anything to be worthy of it. Another reason is that the House of Lords felt that the Budget was too controversial; they thought that Lloyd George had other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is argued by some that Peel was greatly successful up to 1841 due to the fact that he brought the Tory Party from being a “beleaguered minority” (Adelman, 1989) to being a strong, relevant power once again. However, this ‘low point’ of 1832 is often greatly exaggerated by admirers of Peel. Arguably the high levels of support that the Whig’s received in the election of 1832 was predominantly down to the fact that they advocated the issue of Parliamentary Reform, meaning that it can be argued that the period of unpopularity that the Tory party suffered in 1832 could only ever have been temporary. Arguably even if Peel had not advocated the policies which many consider to be very ‘successful’, the fortunes of the Tory Party would have still recovered, as many of the newly enfranchised voters, far from punishing the Tories, enjoyed the exclusivity of Parliament and wanted to retain that exclusivity through conservative policies. Although the skills of Peel as an orator did contribute to the Tory revival to a certain extent, the Whig majority in Parliament was so fundamentally fragile that it hardly needed exploitation by Peel. Although Peel did contribute to disuniting the Whig majority by, for example, exploiting the Whig difficulties in the management of Anglican Church funds in Ireland, the opportunity to do so arose spontaneously, and merely needed to be…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time Labour was a significantly divided party with the Gaitskillites and the Bevanites meaning some support of voters was lost through lack of assurance that the party would lead with strength and could make decisions that were right for the nation and not selfish. The Labour economy policies are also a reason why they lost. Gaitskell promised to increase public spending without increasing taxes. This put his credibility under question. Another reason is that although voters were happy with the nationalisation of electricity, gas, atomic energy and airline industries they thought public ownership of coal and the railways had been a failure when they were last in government and there was little enthusiasm for further nationalisation which Labour was committed to by Clause Four of the Labour Party Constitution.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1867 reform act

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It could also be argued that not only was the government being pressured into reform by these groups but it was scared of the repercussions and outbursts that could follow if the act was not passed. During this time Britain had gone through many difficult times such as , economic depression, a cholera epidemic and quite high unemployment. This would make the government anxious about the current temper of the general public and therefore wouldn’t want to upset them. An example of the public unrest would have been the Hyde park riots of 1867, where railings were ripped off windows were smashed and there was great uproar. This is then…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Beard’s book, An Economic Interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, was published in 1913 and soon became one of the most controversial literary works of its time. Beard’s main thesis in this book is essentially that the Founding Fathers chose the specific format of the Constitution of the United States to protect their personal financial interests. Beard then goes on to argue that the Constitution was written by an “elite” attempting to safeguard their own assets and financial status. Beard was expanding on Carl L. Becker’s thesis of class conflict. In the eyes of Beard, the Constitution was created by the Founding Fathers as a “counter revolution” that ran against the wishes of farmers and laborers.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After two unsuccessful electoral campaigns in the late 19th century and early 20th century, numerous splits in the party after William Gladstone's retirement, and the growing awareness of the issue of poverty within the UK, key figures within the Liberal party realised a change in the direction of Liberalism was required. They pushed for 'New Liberalism', a more modern form of Liberalism that stressed numerous key fundamental values, one of which was that intervention by the state was key in establishing a minimum quality of life for people within the country. Thus from their electoral triumph in 1906, and especially from 1908 onwards, the Liberal government passed a series of social and welfare reforms in an attempt to raise the quality of living standards within the UK. The Liberals based these reforms on three main groups within society, the elderly, the young, and the unemployed. This essay will explore several of the reforms the Liberal government introduced including the National Insurance act, the old age pensions act, a selection of educational acts, as well as acts regarding employment issues; assessing the aims of the acts and arguing how successful they actually proved to be in reducing the issue of poverty in the UK.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this essay is to determine whether welfare reform since 1997 has been determined more by ideology or pragmatism. This essay offers a summary of public pronouncements made by some of New Labour’s leading thinkers in the years before they took office in order to then delve into the motivations behind them. While the focus on welfare reforms undertaken since 1997 rests with the Labour government’s policy toward the NHS, the essay establishes that there is a great deal of evidence to support the view that Labour have acted out of pragmatic considerations. Nevertheless, it is argued that policy toward reforming one of the key elements of welfare in Britain, the National health Service, in the main, has been driven by ideology.…

    • 3395 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton’s plan for a National Bank created controversy in our country. The argument was whether it was “constitutional”. Despite warnings from George Washington two political parties were created. Hamilton led the federalists and Jefferson led the Democratic-Republicans. After the War of 1812 our country entered an Era of Good Feelings in which there was only one political party, the Democratic-Republicans.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The time for a new government came about in times of fear, many men such as William Livingston wondered “if the republic could even survive another decade” for Henry Knox made an excellent point in declaring “Our present federal government is a name, a shadow, without power, or effect”. Meantime the relationship between the states was poor and there was an uncertainty if they would even remain united what with the debts, the economic turmoil, and the slow realization that without England they had no protection from the outside world. The question on everyone’s mind was, is there anything that can be done to save their country? 55 delegates gathered in hopes of answering this question with a brilliant solution of their own.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thatcherites were extremely traditional in their view of the constitution and political system. Modern conservatives now accept that constitutional reform is essential and that the political system needs a good deal of democratic renewal. Although tax cuts are part of the ‘Cameron agenda’ in the long run, the modern party accepts that tax cutting should not be part of a dogmatic ideology, but instead should only be undertaken when the economic conditions are favourable. In general Cameron’s Conservative party is more adaptable and pragmatic, whereas Thatcherism was a more fixed, dogma with fixed principles. There are, however, several points which could be seen as ways in which the modern Conservative Party retains some Thatcherite ideas…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the formation of the government David Cameron made concessions to the Liberal Democrats so that the prospect of a coalition would look more appealing. These concessions included giving significant cabinet positions to Liberal Democrat MPs, Nick Clegg for example became Deputy Prime Minister. It was these concessions that so much reduced the possible individual power of the prime minister and gave the Liberal Democrat cabinet members large amounts of influence over government policy. This resulted from the conservative fear that any significant cabinet resignations would cause the collapse of the government and a the entering into power of the Labour party (as the polls indicate), this means that Cameron had to keep the Lib Dem party onside.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With a new national government under The Constitution, many feared that it could fail to be effective just as the Articles failed, but the acts of Washington and Adams during their presidencies would disprove this fear. For example one of the first things Washington did in his presidency was to establish the first presidential cabinet. The presidential cabinet was a group of four men (Thomas Jefferson- Secretary of State, Alexander Hamilton- Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Knox- Secretary of War, and Edmund Randolph- Attorney General) selected by Washington himself to be his advisers, and help to carry out his duties. The effectiveness or ineffectiveness of his cabinet would appear almost immediately with the rise of Hamilton’s financial plan. Hamilton’s plan called for a funding of national and state debt at par to show the reliability of a strong federal government and establish federalism. But this part of his plan fueled sectionalist ideals between the north and south. Another part of his plan was to establish a National Bank to regulate the economy and establish a national currency. This part of his plan did make the government more effective but it went against Democratic-Republican ideas of a strict interpretation of the constitution, which increased partisan tension. And the last point in his plan was to raise taxes on general goods and excise taxes on luxury goods. When Washington second term came to a close he left the country with three “rules” to follow in his farewell address; avoid sectionalism, avoid political parties, and avoid permanent alliances. These “rules” set a great structure for a young and successful government, but inevitably, weren’t able to be followed.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The national bank for example, Jefferson opposed the idea because the Constitution didn’t give them power to establish a national bank. Jefferson didn’t want the government to over power, and establishing a national bank would give the government too much power in their eyes. Hamilton wanted the National bank because people needed a place to store and keep their money safe, even though the Constitution didn’t state that we could, Hamilton believed that it would benefit the people. Jefferson lost that argument, the National Bank was published…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Progressive Movement

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Progressive reformers set out to destroy corruption in the government. To do so, they believed many changes had to be made. They supported the “initiative” because it allowed voters to directly propose new laws. They supported the “referendum” because any law passed by legislature can be approved or vetoed by the people. Furthermore, they supported “recall” where the people could vote to remove an elected official from office if they saw them unfit. This gave much power back to the people because it gave them a voice in the government. It also forced elected officials to become responsible, attend to the needs of the people, and take part in making the government more efficient. Still unsatisfied, the Progressives reformers won the people the power of electing senators after convincing the U.S. congress to pass the 17th amendment in 1913. Before 1913, senators had been…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commutative Justice and the National Debt . In Chapter 4 of the text, the author examines commutative justice across the generations (see Section 4.5). This idea arises from the writings of British political thinker Edmund Burke (1790):…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays