The home bias in the automotive industry, a comparative research of Toyota and PSA Peugeot Citroën.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RESEARCH DESIGN P.3
BACKGROUND OF TOYOTA P.4
BACKGROUND OF PSA PEUGEOT CITROËN P.6
RESEARCH RESULTS P.8
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION P.19
FIGURE 1: MOBILITY, PEOPLE AND SUSTAINABILITY
FIGURE 2: TOYOTA – R&D INTERNATIONALIZATION
FIGURE 3: TOYOTA PATENT PORTFOLIO P.10
FIGURE 4: TOYOTA 20 MOST PATENTED TECHNOLOGIES
FIGURE 5: CAR BRANDS PATENT DISTRIBUTION P.11
FIGURE 6: PEUGEOT PATENT PORTFOLIO
FIGURE 7: TOYOTA R&D LOCATIONS P.14
FIGURE 8: PEUGEOT R&D LOCATIONS P.17
The last decade has been characterized by an increasing focus on the globalization within the various departments of multinational businesses. The urge of firms to adopt a global business strategy in order to sustain its competitiveness in the current markets is also visible in the R&D area, as many have launched globalization initiatives motivated by the opportunities to attract foreign talent, create competitive cost structures, and create market proximities. Mergers and acquisitions further stimulate the adaptation and integration of R&D activities. The automotive industry, however, is showing a somewhat distinguished picture. As scientific knowledge and technological expertise are becoming increasingly regionalized, and technologies are changing more rapidly than ever, automotive manufacturers are forced to keep a tight eye on their R&D efforts (Calabrese, 2001). This relates to the argument that R&D projects should sometimes be kept within the home base for security reasons. In fact, R&D globalization in the car industry appears to be somewhat limited compared to that of other industries in terms of international duplication and diversification of technology (Calabrese, 2001). This trend, also known as the home bias, is described by Cohen et al. (2009) as applying especially to more important R&D processes. This paper examines the major R&D activities of Toyota and PSA Peugeot Citroën by comparing several indicators and relating these to institutional differences.
Numerous reasons could explain why an automotive manufacturer may not globalize its R&D activities. One problem may relate to corporate inertia; sometimes a gravitational pull can be seen towards the accumulated assets and capabilities (Cohen et al, 2009). Especially when dealing with incremental shifts R&D projects may be biased towards the old knowledge base. Another issue is maturation, since foreign R&D subsidiaries are likely to encounter a certain learning curve, which prevents them from initiating in any core strategic R&D projects until they have gained sufficient experience. Additionally, complexity plays a role because a car consists of over 30.000 parts which need to be put together somehow. Other reasons relate to the requirement for multidisciplinary inputs (design, technology, ICT etc), and the need for prototyping and testing. In order to provide an insight into the home bias and highlight constraining effects caused by national differences, this paper compares the major research and innovation processes of Toyota and PSA Peugeot Citroën, and will discuss the following research question:
TO WHAT EXTENT DO GEOGRAPHICAL CONSTRAINTS CHARACTERIZE THE R&D PROJECTS OF TOYOTA AND PSA PEUGEOT CITROËN AND WHAT EXPLAINS THEM?
Toyota and PSA Peugeot Citroën provide an interesting comparison because they have different countries of origin, and differ greatly in size. Toyota being the largest car manufacturer in the world, and...
References: [accesses 5 June 2009]
APA-Intel Report, 2009
Autoblog, 2009. PSA Peugeot Citroën planning diesel hybrid for 2011. [Online]
Available at: http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/30/psa-peugeot-citroen-planning-diesel-hybrid-for-2011/
[Accessed 5 June 2009]
Autonews. 2009. C3 Picasso developed in a ‘cave’. [Online]
Bunkcley, N., 2008, GM says Toyota has the lead in global sales race, New York times, [online], available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/business/worldbusiness/24auto.html?_r=2&ref=business&oref=slogin
[accessed at 20 May 2009]
Calabrese G., 2001, “R&D globalization in the car industry”, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Vol 1, No .1, 2001
Ciccone, G., Hauschildt, C., 2007, “R&D in Multinationals” Solvay Business School, Academic Year 2007/2008
Inside Line. 2008. Peugeot-Citroen To Open China R&D Center. [Online]
Available at: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=126063
[Accessed 5 June 2009]
Jin Jing, 2008, PSA-Peugeot-Citroen to build shanghai R&D center, Gasgoo global auto sources, [online],
Liker, J., 2004, The 14 Principles of the Toyota Way: An Executive Summary of the Culture Behind TPS, [online], pp. 37,
available at: http://www.si.umich.edu/ICOS/Liker04.pdf
[accessed at 10 May 2009]
Oltra, V., Maïden, S.J., 2009, “Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs): A patent data analysis”
Peugeot Fans Club, 2001. Peugeot Cars History [Online]
Available at: http://peugeot.mainspot.net/
[Accessed 9 May 2009]
Perlmutter, H.V., 2001, “The Tortuous Evolution of the Multinational Corporation”. Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol 4, No 1, pp. 9-19
PSA Peugeot Citroen., 2009. Memento. [Online] PSA Peugeot Citroen.
Available at: http://mediacenter.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/contents/docs/1240836954_PSAMementoGB_.pdf
PSA; strategy and ambition 2010-1015, 2007, [online], pp 1-25, available at: http://www.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/document/presse_dossier/PSA%204%20septembre_online_UK1188888566.pdf [accessed at 9 may 2009]
The Motor Report
[ accessed 25 may 2009]
Toyota Prius: 60 mpg, 2009, The Windsor Star, [Internet], 13 January.
Von Zedtwitz, M., Gassmann, O., Boutellier, R., 2004, “Organizing global R&D: challenges and dilemmas”. Journal of International Management, 10 (2004), pp. 21-49
Please join StudyMode to read the full document