Preview

“a Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution” by Carol Berkin

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1012 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“a Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution” by Carol Berkin
In the book “A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution” by Carol Berkin she explains the constitution from start to finish from how it all began, to the debates inside the convention and finally the end product. Berkin takes the reader and puts him directly in the middle of the convention of 1786; throughout the book you can feel the excitement, the frustration, the tensions between delegates and the overall commitment to making a new government work for all. The time for a new government came about in times of fear, many men such as William Livingston wondered “if the republic could even survive another decade” for Henry Knox made an excellent point in declaring “Our present federal government is a name, a shadow, without power, or effect”. Meantime the relationship between the states was poor and there was an uncertainty if they would even remain united what with the debts, the economic turmoil, and the slow realization that without England they had no protection from the outside world. The question on everyone’s mind was, is there anything that can be done to save their country? 55 delegates gathered in hopes of answering this question with a brilliant solution of their own. The Delegates that gathered in Philadelphia were among the most respected men of their time. They ranged from lawyers to politicians, from the aged Benjamin Franklin to the young Jonathon Dayton, and you’d find that all of these men were of blue blood wealth or the few who as Berkin put were the minority that “Had risen from obscurity to wealth by virtue of some combination of talent, luck, and well-made marriages.” Nobody present would ever be considered just a common man, and for some such as Thomas Jefferson, they would see these men as “Demi-gods” instead of the regular, flawed, yet brilliant men that they were. It was during this convention that the Virginia Plan was proposed by Edmund Randolph, which was the proposal to write a new constitution instead of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book A Brilliant Solution Inventing The American Constitution, Mrs. Berkins stresses about the convention, that the years after the American revolution were very hard times in our nation, how the Articles of Confederation were being fixed by the invention of the American constitution. The states celebrated their freedom, however did not have a developed government to maintain control of the states. Within the first decade of the creation of the Constitution the government had problems with economics, military, and state laws. Throughout the book this problems are resolved little by little, by how well the government tends to the troubles and how they relate to each state. The government had to go through many hardships in order to have…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The years 1776 to 1787 are often considered to be the most important and fateful when compared to all other epochs of American History: the now self-proclaimed Americans, having rebelled against royal authority, needed to develop a new system of government in order to survive. To accomplish such a feat, they needed a basis on which to establish this new authority. Established in autumn of 1777 and fully ratified in 1781, the Articles of Confederation was just this. These documents, at best a primitive constitution, were formed to be the basis of the federal government. While correctly serving as such, the Articles of Confederation subjected the United States to a series of problems in both domestic and foreign respects. Increasing in adversity with each aching year, these documents only brought about one good effect: they showed the Americans that a weak and disorganized government like the one during the Articles’ reign could never work.…

    • 2437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard’s article, Framing the Constitution, alleges the members of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were “disinterested” in providing basic rights for citizens. He stated that the framers of the Constitution of the United States were only concerned in improving their own economic well–being and personal agendas. Therefore, providing information of the events that led up to the Philadelphia Convention and an overview of the Constitution will dismiss his statements, and state his article was a self-serving, conspiracy theory.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Decision in Philadelphia

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The book Decision in Philadelphia the Constitutional Convention if 1787 by Christopher and James Collier offers a unique look at the scribing of the Constitution and the events that not only surrounded it but led up to its creation. The authors take on the events and their creative writing style make the book and enjoyable and fact filled read on one of the country’s most important events. They begin with a historical look at the events that led up to the signing and a brief synopsis of the events that were occurring in the country at the time. The background that they give provides a good base for the information and allows the reader to see things through the eyes of someone living in the time.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Roche presents in his essay, the talent apparent in the constitutionalist that met in Philadelphia was superior amongst other groups, which Roche concludes as an advantage. The fundamental need for an ardent group has been a key component of the formation of the United States, acting as the composers of the prosperous future. Roche may consider this formation an advantage due to the authenticity presented, as their reluctance to divert “original” ambitions to pursue an unpremeditated approach of government (Roche 15). The ascendancy they asserted was within reason as the conditions under the Articles and in 1787 presented the need for a convention, likewise promoting the ratification of the Constitution. Of the defects presented in the time…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May, 1787, 55 men from 11 states gathered in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention. The object of the meeting was to frame a government that was strong enough to hold the states and people together, but also could guard against tyranny. At the time, the Articles of Confederation was in use, but it wasn’t working. So the framers were stuck with a big question. How could the new constitution guard against tyranny? Now, we know that the constitution guards against tyranny because it has federalism, checks and balances, separation of powers, and how representation is set up.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theme: Compromise on a number of important issues was required in order to create the new federal Constitution. Adopting the new document required great political skill and involved changing the ratification process defined in the Articles of Confederation, writing persuasively in support of the stronger central government, and promising to add amendments to protect individual liberty and states' rights.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    By late 1786, it was clear to the states that the Articles of Confederation could no longer provide for an adequate government, an essential function to promote the prosperity of the fledgling country. To fix this problem, delegates from all states except Rhode Island congregated in Philadelphia in an attempt to revise the Articles of Confederation. During the convention, the delegates had a variety of views on how the government should function, which led to lengthy and, at times, acrimonious debates. In the end, however, some kind of compromise would always be reached; then another issue would be brought about and the whole cycle repeats over and over again. Sleepless nights and smoke filled rooms followed one after another. Little did the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1786 Alexander Hamilton called for a Constitutional Convention to discuss the lack of a central government and to fix the Articles of Confederation. The colonies were told to send delegates to the convention. The 55 delegates met, they were composed of merchants, farmers, lawyers and crafters. They were supposed to fix the Articles of Confederation but they decided to create a whole new document and call it the Constitution. This new government would have three branches the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. They also designed a system of Checks and Balances that would make sure that no branch would become too strong. They also made the Constitution able to be changed if necessary. Not all the delegates were professional people they were…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    virginia plan

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page

    On May 29 1787 the Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph said what would be the Virginia plan. Written by Virginian James Madison, the plan traced the broad outlines of what would become the U.S.A Constitution. One with members elected by the people for three year terms and the other composed of older leaders elected by the state legislatures for seven year terms. Both would use population as a basis for dividing seats among the states.…

    • 347 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 our founding fathers gathered in the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia, in the exact same room our Declaration of Independence had been signed a few years prior. This group of men was faced with the immense task of drafting the Constitution of the United States of America. Our founding fathers showed such brilliant foresight in how they structured this foundational document by recognizing the need for a Constitution designed to keep our government regulated. We will be exploring different facets within the structure of the Constitution, looking closely at some of those regulations such as Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. Through this exploration we will come to understand the importance of these aspects, why they are so…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Letter

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It has come to my attention that we have opposing views on many of the topics discussed at the Constitutional Convention. Representation, counting slaves for taxation and representation, federal control of taxes on imports, and the federal governments control on trade are just some of the topics we have yet to see eye to eye on. I would like to focus on one specific issue and bring to your attention the flaws in you system. I would like to explain why I feel that my system would be a better suit for the states. That is why I write this letter to you explaining and observing our different views on representation.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1781, the Articles of Confederation were written in order to secure the states' rights. This document lacked many qualities necessary for a successful government, and therefore caused a great deal of debate concerning the ratification of a new system. Federalists advocated the passing of a new Constitution, welcoming the tie it would establish between states and the creation of a strong central government. Opposing the constitution were the anti-federalists, threatened by its ability to eliminate their liberties just as they were previously executed by King George III.…

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays