A Brawl in Mickey’s Backyard

A Brawl in Mickey’s Backyard
In this case it seems as if the Disney World resort mainly cares about their money. A chance to build homes next to the resort was offered but Disney opposed the offer for some odd reason. According to one of their workers “They want to make more money, but they don’t care about their employees”. Some of the workers feel as though the resort doesn’t care about them. There many workers who had to live in one room apartments with a big family just because they couldn’t afford anywhere better they had to stay there. The issue in the case is that many of the employees don’t have affordable housing. The problem arised because there was going to be a housing complex built next to the resort and they said no. They need to solve this problem as soon as possible because they could lose employees over this situation. To solve this problem Disney World needs to support their employees and really show that they care. The relevant market stakeholders in this case are Disney World and Suncal because they all are in the mix of building new complexes. Disney World didn’t want the new complex built next to it. Then the non market stakeholders in the situation were the employees because they didn’t really hold a position in this situation. The stakeholders in this case interest is to make money. They seem to only really care about the profit that they are making instead of their employees. The stakeholder is also against Suncal because they don’t want them to build homes on that land. They want that land to just be for tourist because that does give them more of a profit. Disney World has a lot of power in this case because they deny the construction of new affordable homes being built. They also seem to have the city council on their side because they have to go through them to build new things. The conclusion that I can draw from the stakeholder map is that the stake holder really just wants to make the profit. They don’t seem to care about their