Preview

ZZZZ Best Company, Inc.: Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1336 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ZZZZ Best Company, Inc.: Case Study
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
ZZZ Best Company, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------
Case Study 2
-------------------------------------------------
Due Date: March 30,2010

ZZZ Best, Case 1. Ernst & Whinney never issued an audit opinion on financial statements of ZZZZ Best but did issue a review report on the company’s quarterly statements for the three months ended July 31, 1986. How does a review differ from an audit, particularly in terms of the level of assurance implied by the auditor’s report?
There are numerous differences between performing a review and actual audit on the financial statements, but the major one is that the review does not contemplate obtaining an understanding of internal control structure. Also, a review does not assess control risk, tests of accounting records and responses to inquiries by obtaining corroborating evidence through inspection, observation or any other audit procedure. It can point out significant matters of the financial statements but does not provide assurance of their accuracy. The issue with ZZZZ Best case is that the auditors review was not sufficient enough to review any misstatements on the financial statements. Erns & Whinney never questioned the internal control, reviewed contractual agreements or made comparison of the previous statements. If they had done any of the above, they would have revealed a glitch in the system. In addition, the review does not provide the assurance that an audit opinion would do on the financial statement.

2. SAS No.106, "Audit Evidence," identifies the principal "management assertions" that underlie a set of financial statements. The occurrence assertion was particularly critical for ZZZZ Best's insurance restoration contracts. ZZZZ Best's auditors obtained third-party confirmations to support the contracts, reviewed available documentation, performed analytical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (Second Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.…

    • 927 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A review report does not assess the control risk of a company, which means Ernst & Whinney could have not gotten the proper risk that a material misstatement could occur within a relevant assertion. The report could have pointed out problems in the financial statements but it would not give the audit teams assurance of their accuracy. Ernst & Whinney never investigated ZZZZ Best’s internal control either, if they had done so they may have caught onto some of the fraudulent acts that were being committed. The main difference between an audit opinion and a review is an audit opinion provides assurance on the financial statements that they are accurate.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Golden Bear Case

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Professional auditing standards identify 5 “management assertions” that commonly underlie a set of financial statements. These 5 assertions are: occurrence, completeness, valuation/allocation, rights/obligations, and presentation/disclosure. With respect to the audit of Paragon’s construction project, some of these key assertions were overlooked by auditor Arthur Anderson. The main assertions that Anderson should have focused on for this audit include occurrence, valuation, and disclosure.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fi 504 Case Study 2

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * A statement that a registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the management’s internal control .2…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 1.9

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A review report does not assess the control risk of a company, which means Ernst & Whinney could have not gotten the proper risk that a material misstatement could occur within a relevant assertion. The report could have pointed out problems in the financial statements but it would not give the audit teams assurance of their accuracy. Ernst & Whinney never investigated ZZZZ Best’s internal control either, if they had done so they may have caught onto some of the fraudulent acts that were being committed. The main difference between an audit opinion and a review is an audit opinion provides assurance on the financial statements that they are accurate.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acc 491 Week 3

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. All accounts payable owed as of the balance sheet date are included in the financial statements. Completeness…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Knapp Case 1.9

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Both a review and an audit are attestation services performed by a CPA, however an audit has a high level of assurance that comes with it, telling external users of financial statements that they are sound. A review should not be relied upon as heavily as an audit when making decisions about a company because a review does not require the same level of assurance.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Auditors should obtain and evaluate sufficient appropriate evidence to support significant accounting estimates. Differences between the estimates best supported by the evidence and…

    • 1679 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Confirmation is the process of obtaining and evaluating a direct communication from a third party in response to a request for information about a particular item affecting financial statement assertions. It describes the concept of assessing inherent and control risks, determining the acceptable level of detection risk, and designing an audit program to achieve an appropriately low level of audit risk. The auditor uses the audit risk assessment in determining the audit procedures to be applied, including whether they should include confirmation. The greater the combined assessed level of inherent and control risk, the greater the assurance that the auditor needs from substantive tests related to a financial statement assertion. Consequently, as the combined assessed level of inherent and control risk increases, the auditor designs substantive tests to obtain more or different evidence about a financial statement assertion. In these situations, the auditor might use confirmation procedures rather than or in conjunction with tests directed toward documents or parties within the entity.…

    • 2245 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contemp Auditing 5-3 6-22

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (Audit evidence) During the course of an audit, the auditor examines a wide variety of documentation. Listed below are some forms of documentary evidence and the sources from which they are obtained. Please enter just the number associated with a appropriate “source” found below:…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Billy S Beats Inc 1

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page

    The auditor should determine the appropriate types and mounts of evidence needed to be satisfied that the client’s financial statements are fairly stated as well as the client maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. The auditor should make sure the procedures they choose can provide persuasive evidence which means the evidence must be appropriate and sufficient and the procedures they choose could provide relevant and reliable evidences.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the runershop

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages

    To illustrate the linkage of management assertions to audit evidence in the context of auditing Notes Payable.…

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ernst and Whitney never issued an audit opinion on financial statements of ZZZZ Best but did issue a review report on the company’s quarterly statements for the three months ended July 31, 1986. How does a review differ from an audit, particularly in terms of the level of assurance implied by the auditor’s report?…

    • 1401 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is3350 Unit 1-2 Class 1

    • 5013 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Comment: this standard is a review of intro audit concepts including sufficiency and appropriateness of evidence (A1-A6); audit procedures (substantive and tests of controls—A 10-A 25); relevance (A 27- A 30); reliability (A 31-51); and selecting items (A 52-56): 100% exam, selecting specific items, and audit sampling. The standard has a specialized appendix on reliance on actuaries for evidence.…

    • 5013 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    job analysis

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    CasePlace.org is a free service for business school students. Members of CasePlace.org can view sample case studies that have been categorized by topic and ... Read More »…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics