Preview

Zimmer Biomet Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zimmer Biomet Case Study
Zimmer Biomet Shoulder Lawsuit
Zimmer Biomet Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder Humeral implant is a reverse shoulder device designed to restore arm movement. Increased instances of failure have led to a massive recall of this medical device. Following the reports, many people who have been affected by the recall have lodged lawsuits against the product manufacturer, Zimmer Biomet, Inc. The company is a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of orthopedic products in the US. The three types of claims associated with recalled products are:
• Defective manufacture claim
• Failure to warn claim
• Defective design claim

The failure to warn claim occurs when the product manufacturer fails to notify or educate users on the defect and risks associated with using the recalled product. Under the defective design claim, the product manufacturer is held responsible for failure to provide adequate information on product development along with failure to test and foresee defects that may arise in the event the product fails. With regards to defective manufacture claim, the manufacturer is held liable for defects arising from poor manufacture and lack of proper
…show more content…
The distribution was done over a period of 7 years. The lawsuit against Zimmer Biomet was first was filed in 2014 by a man who had received two shoulder implants, the first one in 2009 and the other in 2010. The two devices failed within a few years. For recourse, the patient was forced to undergo additional surgeries to replace the faulty devices. This Zimmer Biomet shoulder lawsuit was settled for $350,000 in 2016. Following the recalls, the FDA has classified Zimmer Biomet shoulder lawsuits Class 1 recall; the highest recall category because the device could result in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Culpepper V. Weihrauch KG

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On August 12, 1996, Plaintiff, Ann Culpepper, filled action against defendant, Hermann Weihrauch KG, ETC., seeking damages for injuries she sustained after an accidental shooting from the gun she owned that was manufactured by Weihrauch. Ann Culpepper imposed liability on Weihrauch under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine of 1979. This doctrine provides liability “if a company manufactured, designed or sold a defective product, which by unreasonably unsafe conditions, injured someone or damaged their property when such product, unaltered, was put to its intended use.”…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "In determining whether liability exists under a duty-risk analysis, a plaintiff must prove that the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm, that [the] defendant owed a duty to [the] plaintiff which [the] defendant breached and that the risk of harm was within the scope of protection afforded by the duty breached." The court used a different set of principles to determine DOTD’s liability. “The plaintiff bears the burden of showing that: (1) the DOTD had custody of the thing that caused the plaintiff's injuries or damages; (2) the thing was defective because it had a condition that created an unreasonable risk of harm; (3) the DOTD had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect and did not take corrective measures within a reasonable time; and (4) the defect in the thing was a cause-in-fact of the plaintiff's…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b. Product liability for a defective product and a failure to warn of the dangers of handling liquid served as hot as appellee’s coffee…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In today's economic market, companies rarely produce all the products or parts necessary to manufacture their finished products. However, when the final product hits the market, the manufacturer is responsible for the final product. The producer of the defective part had a responsibility to inspect their product before sale to its customer Buick. In turn, it was Buick's responsibility to inspect the product for defect before sale to the dealerships who in turn would sell to the ultimate purchasers in general public. Since automobiles are inherently dangerous, a duty of care is owed to the ultimate purchasers.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to (Melvin, 2011) “Products liability refers to the liability of any seller (including the manufacturer, retailer, and any intermediary seller such as a wholesaler) of a product that, because of a defect, causes harm to a consumer.” (P.226). Sally could argue BUGusa were negligent by not including the insulation needed on the equipment just to save on production costs. However, a more appealing option for Sally to pursue would be a strict liability tort because she doesn’t need to prove the elements of negligence. Sally could argue that BUGusa are strictly liable for her injuries because they placed a product on the market without insulation and she was injured as a…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    for strict liability torts. BUGusa, Inc. failed to provide an insulator in their original design for their wire tappers due to the production cost. BUGusa, Inc. has since realized its mistake, yet did not recall the older versions of the equipment, leaving Sally at risk of injury, which is exactly what happened. Strict Liability can be defined, as; “the legal responsibility for damages or injury, even if the person found strictly liable is not at fault.” (USLegal.com, 2014). Under this definition, Sally does not have to prove that BUGusa, Inc. was negligent in their actions producing their product, just that the product in question was defective, and it caused her…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kolchek Negligence Case

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lastly, in this case the manufacturer is liable for failure to exercise care to any person who sustains an injury caused by a defective product.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If an accident was caused by a vehicle malfunction, a claim can be pursued with the automaker…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lemon Law

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages

    • Has manufacturer's defects that occurred during the first year from the delivery date or the expiration of the warranty (whichever period ends first)…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. The Lemon Law says that the manufacturer is responsible for taking care of the defects.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) Lack of Experience: Erik’s promotion to the position of General Manager was due to a sense of urgency and not on the basis of…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama recognizes two theories of strict liability, which are ultra-hazardous or abnormally dangerous activities, and unreasonably dangerous products. Ultra-hazardous itself and the risk of harm it creates to those in the vicinity. The basis for liability is that one who for his own purposes creates an abnormal risk of harm to his neighbors must be responsible for relieving that harm when in fact it does occur. Unreasonably dangerous products are unreasonable when it is foreseeable, and the manufacturer’s ability or unreasonable danger is the measure of its duty in the design of its product. A manufacture’s failure to achieve its full potential in the design unreasonable danger forms the basis for it strict liability in tort. In the following case Dickinson v. City of Huntsville, 822 So. 2d 411, 417 (Ala. 2001) is an example of the ultra-hazardous strict liability.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (MAH) have an obligation to monitor, collect and manage product safety (or quality) information which…

    • 4498 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the text; Torts and Personal Injury Law (Okrent, 2009); absolute (strict) liability holds a tortfeasor responsible for his or her behavior regardless of fault. Some people feel that it is unfair to hold a defendant accountable especially if he or she did not behave intentionally. “That is why absolute liability is restricted in certain types of activities, such as abnormally dangerous task and defectively dangerous products, where the risk involved substantially outweighs the benefits” (Okrent, 2009). Product liability is any form of liability arising out of the use of a defective product. A plaintiff can bring three different causes of actions depending on the facts: strict tort liability, negligence, or breach of warranty.” Under products liability, the manufacturer or the seller of a product is absolutely liable for a defective product that has caused an injury (Okrent, 2009).…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthrex

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arthrex is a global medical device company and leader in new product development and medical education in orthopedics. The company was started in 1981 in Munich, Germany by Reinhold Schmieding, and has since moved its headquarters to Naples, Florida. They have locations in the Eastern and Western Hemispheres. Some locations include Germany, Switzerland, Korea, Japan, Denmark, Poland, Florida, California, and Canada to name a few of the countries it distributes its products to worldwide. More than 94% of Arthrex’s products are manufactured in the United States, and exported to more than 100 countries in the world. To go along with their mission of helping surgeons treat patients better and contribute to safe and successful patient outcomes, their corporate location in Naples, Florida serves as an education destination for surgeons from around the world to learn about new products and techniques through hands-on surgical skills training programs. To this day Arthrex holds about 200 patents in orthopedic devices.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics