Preview

Zimbardo Use Of Torture

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
853 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zimbardo Use Of Torture
Torture is inhumane, most countries should outlaw it even our own, the science of torture has evolved through war over time most militaries have adopted these techniques like waterboarding, chinese water torture,etc.. Most of these techniques were made from the technology of the ages so why do we still follow old torture traditions if there are new psychology was that prove just as effective and more humane.

Zimbardo one of the first psychologist who studied prison affects and the power of authority in prison environments and found out that people that pose of higher authority (prison guards) usually harass and harm the lower authority. (Inmates) His discovery lead to how people in prisons are treated and it helped
…show more content…
His techniques showed the world how to treat prisoners without using traditional techniques of torture and inhumane punishments. His techniques for negotiations did not involve physical or mental abuse and instead takes a more friendly approach. His tactics started by getting the prisoner off guard by a friendly approach and starting a conversation with the prisoner. In the article Eliciting Intelligence Using the Scharff-Technique:Closing in on the Confirmation/Disconfirmation-Tactic by Lennart May and some other scientist they discovered and explain Scharffs techniques that were used in World War Two, his first tactic was to become as friendly and start up a conversation which he was already a good talker and person which he stayed in contact with some of the prisoners through the rest of his life. The next tactic was not pressing information by this the Article states that he rarely asked any few or no questions at all. Both Tactics formed the basic foundation of the Scharff-Technique. The next and sort of last tactic is lie well sort of it is more of a white lie, he explains it as an illusion by knowing it all. Scharff typically opened the conversation by stating that it was unlikely that the prisoner would be able to offer any new information beyond what is already knew. This is a very long explanation of …show more content…
None of these studies except Hanns Scharff`s have not been studied why we need to torture and not just have a conservation with trickery and deceitfulness instead of torturing people that may or may not have anything to do with what is happening between countries and have no information about the topic in hand therefore will be tortured until death because of the lack of information that they have.Most people are just pons playing in a king's battle that have no information even if they joined their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, psychologist Phillip Zimbardo set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was to test human behavior when one's role had been altered into authoritative one. Still powerful after all these years the experiment was the most powerful and popular experiment of all time (O'Toole, K). Researches set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University building. There were the 24 students out of 70 volunteers chosen to play the roles of the prisoners or prison guards.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The students involved in the Zimbardo Prison Experiment were not cruel people, nor were they truly sadistic. When given the roles as prison guards and prisoners, their behaviors changed dramatically. As prison guards, normally friendly students acted as prison guards under the warden. Under the authority of the guards, the students with the roles of prisoners acted unnaturally and did as the guards told them. Similarly, the soldiers in Germany under Hitler's command did as they were told and acted as they did, not because they were bad people, but because of their positions in German society. They were soldiers and did as a German soldier under Hitler would do. Neither prison guard nor soldier acted aggressively because of their own personalities,…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Torture/Terrorisim

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: 1. Head, Tom. American Torture Techniques. Ed. Mike Zane. N.p., 11 Mar. 2012. Web. 11 July 2012. <http://civilliberty.about.com/od/waronterror/p/torturelite.htm>.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo

    • 3402 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The premise of this book is that otherwise good (or at least not actively bad) people can do bad, indeed evil things and that this can be explained by the situation in which the acts took place. In 1971 Zimbardo conducted the "Stanford prison experiment" in which students enacted the roles of prison guards and prisoners - the results so traumatised Zimbardo that supposedly he never gave the experiment the complete write-up he intended to. Many years later he acted as an expert witness for the defense of one of the soldiers in the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal. It was this experience and his frustration with organisations who still explain wrongdoing as being the work of a "few bad apples" rather than a "bad system" that caused him to write this book.…

    • 3402 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In light of the recent events such as the War on Terrorism and the war in Iraq, torture has become a topic of close consideration. Torture is sometimes used when a person who is believed to have information about a possible harmful event or information about an illegal organization, is then inflicted with pain by members of the opposing side with a series of different physical and mental distresses, in hope of forcing the person to give over desired information. Torture has often been used during times of war and political unrest, and in situations where the information could protect the society from danger. I believe that torture is never an…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is the intentional pain that an individual experiences justified by the possibility of preserving the lives of many? Torture is the used as a weapon, but in reality does it work? The purpose of this essay is to identify what the motives are for using torture, the effectiveness of torture, and important issues or flaws with the entire process of torture.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are put under a time crunch that affects how we deal with situations. Michael Levin wrote in his essay “The Case for Torture” that we should use torture because it is better to torture one person who is obviously guilty. This would help insure that thousands of lives could be saved at the expense of just one or a few people. In a brief statement about terrorist’s rights, Levin says “torture is barbaric? Mass murder is more barbaric” (532). In this simple statement, Levin argues that torturing is the lesser of two evils. And it is true. Would we rather sacrifice many lives for one that is potentially guilty? Most would say no. In fact, if we allow torture to become legal, we might get results that many have not thought of. If torture was made legal, it could potentially intimidate future terrorists into thinking twice about their plans. Still, nothing is for…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many questions relating to the use of torture against any person whatsoever. As such, there are different perspectives on the ethics of its usage as well. While some believe that the use of torture becomes necessary at times, others believe that whatever the circumstances are, torture can never be justified. Some very pertinent issues related to the use of torture are, “Suppose a child has been kidnapped and a person has been suspected of committing the crime. Is it justifiable to torture that person in order to try to extract information from him about the child? Now suppose the person would not react at all if he is subjected to torture but there is a chance that he would divulge information if his child of the similar age as the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a matter of fact, the Association for the Prevention of Torture points out, “Further, using torture ourselves allows other countries to more easily justifying using torture against our own soldiers and nationals” ("Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario" 845). If tormenting captured victims to get further intelligence, then our country is not doing nothing but setting a bad example for the nations around the world. Much less, more innocents might become victims of torture because of a pure excuse of the government wanting to keep the people safe. Even if any of attackers was captured and tortured for information, surely they have already had everything planned to put them to action. Innocents would die of we were to threat and torture or even kill the person captured.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Torture Wrong

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture is the intentional inflicting of severe pain and suffering on people to punish or intimidate them so that they will extract information (Doing Ethics). Torture is morally wrong if it is unjustifiable or does not serve a purpose. On the other hand, to protect and secure our country from extremist and other terrorist, it can be morally justified. Keeping torture quiet with the public and out of world news is crucial. If it got out that the Americans were torturing assumed terrorists or enemies of the state for answers, it could cause great controversy. Although torture can be seen as unethical and unjustifiable, it is needed to protect…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Torture

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Imagine a ticking Bomb, We would need to get this information quickly to save those lives. Torture would forsure get it faster than just merely talking.In “Does torture work” by Martin robbins; it states”one could easily conclude that coercive methods are not only effective, but also substantially more…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, as a nation founded on the basis of fundamental human rights, and equality for all, torture is an unacceptable and inexcusable act that degrades us as a nation and as individuals. It debases us and makes us scarcely better than those we condemn. Just as a rose by any other name will smell just as sweet, torture by any other name remains just as deplorable.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays