Preview

Zimbardo-Ghraib Prison Experiment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zimbardo-Ghraib Prison Experiment
Authority and Identity usually lead to compliances and conformity and these techniques usually occur in real life situation too. To test out if human being would lose their moral and social values when they lost their individuality, Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in 1971 to see how readily people would conform to the roles of guard and prisoner in a role-playing exercise that simulated prison life (Zimbardo - Stanford Prison Experiment, 2008). This experiment was called The Stanford Prison Experiment and it was conducted at Stanford University. While the real life situation that was being mentioned, connected and relevant to Zimbardo’s experiment is the Abu Ghraib prison abuses. Abu Ghraib prison was a U.S. Army detention center for
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary of Stanley Milgram's Prison Experiment and "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism" by Marianne Szegedy-Maszak.
    • 779 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary of Stanley Milgram's Prison Experiment and "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism" by Marianne Szegedy-Maszak.

    Throughout this essay, Szegedy-Maszak attempts to answer the question: Are there particular conditions in Iraq that might shed light on why these soldiers committed these unconscionable acts? (Szegedy-Maszak p. 173). She begins by presenting two famous psychological experiments that explore the capacity for evil residing in normal people, (Szegedy-Maszak p. 174). The first experiment, conducted by Stanford psychologist Philip Zimbardo, attempted to mimic a real life prison scenario with students impersonating actual guards and prisoners. Surprisingly, the results were analogous to the actual events that took place at Abu Ghraib prison. The second experiment, created by Stanley Milgram, studied some peoples willingness to follow orders. The experiment began with an actor sitting in a chair supposedly wired with electricity. For every wrong answer this actor would give, volunteers were asked to deliver increasingly dangerous electric shocks to the actor in the chair. The results showed that two out of the three volunteers delivered potentially lethal electric shocks.…

    • 779 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo
    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did The Stanford Prison Experiment Affect Zimbardo's Behavior
    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Did The Stanford Prison Experiment Affect Zimbardo's Behavior

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Milgram and Zimbrado
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Milgram and Zimbrado

    Difference #1. A major difference between Zimbardo’s and Milgram’s studies is that, in the prison study, only one experimental manipulation was performed — being assigned to the role of prisoner or guard. This is a major limitation because we cannot know, as we did in the Milgram study, which factors in the situation were most important for the behaviors observed. There is no doubt that each participant’s self-definition as prisoner or guard was important, but it might have helped us to develop a deeper understanding of how such a self-definition can be maintained if Zimbardo and his colleagues had varied other factors in the situation. For example, would wearing normal clothes, which might have caused increased feelings of individuality, have resulted in decreased role-playing? Would a decrease in the reality of the simulation (perhaps by removing the bars on the doors, or having campus security “arrest” the prisoners) have done the same? It would have been very interesting, for example, if we had found that none of these factors were important — that, instead, it was simply the assigning of an arbitrary social role by an authority figure and the…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo
    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo

    Psychological studies are relatively new as far as the history of scientific research is concerned. As with anything, the rules for these experiments have evolved and become what they are today only through past circumstances. There are some main experiments in past psychological history, which became a true turning point and reasons for ethical guidelines to be placed. These experiments include the medical atrocities during WWII, the Tuskegee syphilis project, Milgram’s obedience studies, and Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment. Although the participants in Zimbardo’s study were informed of the situation they would have to endure, there was still a significant amount of psychological damage done.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hofling Prison Experiment
    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hofling Prison Experiment

    He wanted to see if nurses would follow orders given by an authority figure (Doctor) when the orders are given over the phone and would be breaking regulations. To study obedience in a real life setting.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo
    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo And The Stanford Prison Experiment
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Zimbardo And The Stanford Prison Experiment

    Most people desire some sort of power. Whether it is political power or economic power, this yearning runs our society. Some people use their power to benefit others, and other person inappropriately use their power to degrade and diminish. As explored in the Stanford Prison Experiment, Philip Zimbardo states people change with they are given “power without oversight” (Zimbardo, The Psychology of Evil, TedTalk). Though the students were considered “good apples,” the combination of situation and the system caused the guards to lose their identities and to abuse their power in inhumane ways. The results of the experiment were derived many observations and conclusions about the subjects; however, Zimbardo’s switch between running the experiment…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Experiment Thesis
    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Zimbardo Experiment Thesis

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Zimbardo Prison Experiment
    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Zimbardo Prison Experiment

    The students involved in the Zimbardo Prison Experiment were not cruel people, nor were they truly sadistic. When given the roles as prison guards and prisoners, their behaviors changed dramatically. As prison guards, normally friendly students acted as prison guards under the warden. Under the authority of the guards, the students with the roles of prisoners acted unnaturally and did as the guards told them. Similarly, the soldiers in Germany under Hitler's command did as they were told and acted as they did, not because they were bad people, but because of their positions in German society. They were soldiers and did as a German soldier under Hitler would do. Neither prison guard nor soldier acted aggressively because of their own personalities,…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment

    This study was conducted by Professor Phillip Zimbardo at Stanford University in 1971. Zimbardo wanted to find out if a situation can control the person or can an individual’s beliefs, attitude and values would allow one to rise above their current situation. He wanted to look more in-depth in the behavioral and sociological consequences in the roles of the guard and prisoner. Also, he wanted to find out why and how social situations can overwhelm people. In order to find study subjects, Zimbardo advertised in the paper for healthy, male students and offered $15 a day for up to two weeks. His subjects were predominately white, middle class students with no history of drug use or a criminal record. The basement of Stanford’s psychology department…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abu Ghraib - The Inside Story
    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Abu Ghraib - The Inside Story

    How does ‘Lyndiee England at Abu Ghraib’ help us to understand why good people to bad things?…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    SOCIO 101 QUIZ 1
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    SOCIO 101 QUIZ 1

    Social scientists should not be allowed to undertake replications of Milgram’s obedience experiment and Zimbardo’s prison simulation at face value just as other instances in the same field (i.e. the tuskegee syphilis study, and the wichita jury study) because these experiments violated the fundamental principles in the ASA ethical standards especially in maintaining objectivity, respecting the subjects’ rights to privacy and dignity, and protecting subjects from harm which is clearly shown in Zimbardo’s prison simulation where the one conducting the study became so engrossed in his role in the experiment rather than his goal. To help discontinue these kinds of experiment that posed danger to the well-being of the participants in the future; the group decided that the current American Sociological Association (ASA) ethical standards should be altered in order to aid sociologists in conducting their experiments safely. Despite the fact that these experiments are deemed unethical, it is undeniable that we found results helpful in understanding how the society works. Therefore, experiments like these should be done with utmost caution. After all, the basic principles of ASA should uphold the real purpose of these experiments, which is to find answers to questions without the need to violate and harm a person’s welfare.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Comparison Essay
    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Comparison Essay

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo
    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Zimbardo

    The Stanford County Prison experiment by Zimbardo (1971) supports Milgram’s study. Zimbardo (1973) experiment took place in a pretend prison house which was created in the basement of Stanford University. This was to investigate the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner/prison guard. Participants in both studies had a difficult time ending the experiment. The participants felt they did not want to appear inconsistent or leave the experiment. Participant’s behaviour was in control by social/professional forces and environmental contingences, rather than their own personality traits or character power.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics