Preview

Zappos Refelcetive Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
801 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Zappos Refelcetive Analysis
Zappos Reflective Analysis

Two of the most important Human Resource Management theorists, whose work is still impacting management theory and practice today is Douglas McGregor and Rensis Likert. Douglas McGregor refers to Theory X style of management as being an old, out dated model of authority founded primarily on coercion of employees. He claims that the average worker dislikes work and will avoid it if they can. Because of this outlook workers must be controlled and/or threatened with discipline in order to achieve objectives. In addition, his belief is that if Theory X continues to be the guiding philosophy behind management strategy then organizations will fail to realize the full potential of workers as human beings. McGregor claims that Theory Y situates work as providing the possibility for human growth and the realization of higher needs of esteem and self-actualization. Thus the primary goal of Theory Y is integration. McGregor thought of as an environment for the employees to whereas they could achieve their personal goals by directing their efforts toward the success of the organization. Likert outlined four systems of management to describe the relationship, involvement, and roles of managers and subordinates in industrial settings. The Four System Approach identifies different leadership styles listed as follows: 1) Exploitative-authoritative, 2) Benevolent-authoritative, 3) Consultative System and 4) Participative System. (Mumby, D. K. 2013) Of these four styles of leadership the Exploitative-authoritative is most similar to McGregor’s Theory X where motivation occurs through fear and threats, decisions are made by top management staff, management communications viewed with great suspicion and usually a high turnover rate of employees. The Benevolent-authoritative style of management is less controlling than the Exploitative-authoritative system using the potential for punishment and partially on reward



References: Mumby, D.K. (2013) Organizational Communication: A Critical Approach. Los Angeles: Sage Publications 2011, from http://www.wiki.com

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Four leadership theories have been outlined and analyzed in this paper. It is evident that many theories of leadership exist with overlapping qualities from these leadership theories are integrated by successful leaders in various organizations, as leaders adjust to their various leadership styles. There is no single leadership theory or style that can be upheld as the best management theory. One can conclude that leadership ultimately rests on the amalgamation of various leadership traits from the various leadership theories in existence. Northouse, P. (2004) maintained that successful leaders adopt different leadership approaches, implementing the appropriate combination of different leadership styles depending on the circumstances. Evidently, the leadership approach has a great influenced employee productivity and morale. The leadership theory research has been to use the various aspects of leadership to achieve leadership…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Kreitner and Kinicki (2013) McGregor contrasted two views on human nature by insisting that Theory Y assumes that people are more positive at work, and believed managers could accomplish more by viewing employees as such (p.9). The other outdated theory, is Theory X, which is a more negative and pessimistic assumption about workers.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mgt 330

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages

    2. Be familiar with Theory X and Theory Y managers (teachers). (Table 1-2, p. 7) Outdated Theory X – most people hate work and need to be directed, they must be threatened with punishment before they will work….Modern Theory Y – work is natural, people can direct themselves, people will become oriented with organizational goals is they are rewarded for doing so, typical employee can welcome responsibility, typical person is creative, imaginative and has ingenuity.…

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    McGregor grouped employees hierarchy need into lower-order needs (Theory X) and higher-order needs (Theory Y), and opined that “these two opposing perceptions conjectured how people view human behavior at work and organizational life” (Wambugu, 2014). For instance, Theory X assumed that management's role in the organization is to pressurize and control employees to perform based on the insinuation that human beings are pressure seekers who dislike work; do not want responsibility, and have little or no ambition etc. as such it's the duty of managers to make them do their job, and often with threats of punishment in order to get them to achieve the organizational objectives. On the other hand, Theory Y assumed that management's role in an organization involves developing the potential in employees and help them to achieve their maximum potential towards common organizational goals based on the views that people among other things learn to accept and seek responsibility, creativity, ingenuity which will have the potential to boost the organizational performance (Wambugu, 2014). These theories could be used by management either ways to encourage employees, but better results would be gained by the use of Theory Y, rather than Theory X (McGregor,…

    • 3719 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cipd Level 5 Dpp

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Within the realms of practicing the McGregor Theory Y Management style. French and Raven’s Five Sources of Power (1960) is important to understand, as this could aid in problem solving, negotiating and persuading and cross functional collaboration. Leadership influence depends on the type of power that the Leader can exercise over others.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The five bases of power are divided into two groups; formal power and personal power, and further subdivided into five specific categories under each group. Categories of formal power are coercive power, reward power, and legitimate power, and they come from the authority of one person over another. Categories of personal power are expert power and referent power, and they come from one’s characteristics rather than one’s authority. “Coercive power base depends on fear of the negative results from failing to comply.” (Judge and Robbins, 2012) It is the most conspicuous form of power from the people’s perspective. Fear of negative results can lead to dissatisfaction and resentment, and it is usually the least effective power. People will acquiesce to coercive power to avoid the stated negative results, but its excessive use can ultimately undermine the leader’s ability to lead. Reward power is said to be the opposite of coercive power, and is, “Compliance achieved based on the ability to distribute rewards that others view as valuable.” (Judge and Robbins, 2012) These rewards are based on compliance, and the benefits can be either financial or nonfinancial such as promotions, raises, bonuses, preferred work schedules, or time off. Legitimate power is, “the formal authority to control and use organizational resources based on structural position in the organization.” (Judge and Robbins, 2012) This power is greater than the power to reward or coerce, because it relies on the peoples acknowledgement of the authority of a leaders position. It can be unstable on a personal level, if the leader is seen as not having the authority in a certain area, the power is lost. “Expert power is influence wielded as a result of expertise, special skill, or knowledge.” (Judge and Robbins, 2012) This category shifts the balance of power from authority to personal. When you can exhibit expertise in a field, people are more apt to trust and respect what you have to say, and they will…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The four contemporary approaches to management are: Sociotechnical systems theory, quantitative management, organizational behavior, and systems theory.…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management styles can be divided into three main categories of autocratic, paternalistic or democratic and they reflect the ways managers make decisions relating to their subordinates.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    unit 650

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1.1 McGregor's X and y theory he argues that manager's approach their staff with a set of basic assumptions.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory X and Y

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    McGregor maintained that there are two fundamental approaches to managing people. Many managers tend towards theory x, and generally get poor results. Enlightened managers use theory y, which produces better performance and results, and allows people to grow and develop.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: McCroskey C., James Organizational Communication for Survival: Making Work, Work 4th ed. Richmond, Virginia: Pearson Education, 2009…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Managerial Grid Theory

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The dictatorial (previously, produce or perish) style (9,1): control and dominate. With a high concern for production, and a low concern for people, managers using this style find employee needs unimportant; they provide their employees with money and expect performance in return. Managers using this style also pressure their employees through rules and punishments to achieve the company goals. This dictatorial style is based on Theory X of Douglas McGregor, and is commonly applied by companies on the edge of real or perceived failure. This style is often used in cases of crisis management.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are three principle leadership styles. They are Goleman’s providing six management styles for leaders to work more efficiently with followers based on situation (Hoang, 2010) and Blake and Mouton’s in which the combination between the concern for people and for production is presented and result in the effective management style (BPP learning media, 2010). Moreover, the Hersey and Blanchard’s studies how “leaders match their style to the competence and commitment of subordinates” (Hoang, 2012, p.15).…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In today’s era of reorganization, revolution, and change, Leadership is essential for the organization’s competitiveness. It can be pursued through different style and can be perceived in a distinct way according to the various contexts. For this reason we can figure out a plurality of Leadership styles, each…

    • 2598 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rrrrrrrrr

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In big organization this leadership is designed and structured in every higher positions and the authority as an answer to every future problems or conflicts as well as to get the job done efficiently and this leadership power lies at the very apex of the power pyramid structure however leaders of this style may exercise more power than his limits, by accepting additional responsibility from his seniors if it occurs.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics