The field of environmental ethics concerns human beings’ ethical relationship with the natural environment. While numerous philosophers have written on this topic throughout history,environmental ethics only developed into a specific philosophical discipline in the 1970s. This emergence was no doubt due to the increasing awareness in the 1960s of the effects that technology, industry, economic expansion and population growth were having on the environment. The development of such awareness was aided by the publication of two important books at this time. Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring , first published in 1962, alerted readers to how the widespread use of chemical pesticides was posing a serious threat to public health and leading to the destruction of wildlife. Of similar significance was Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 book, The Population Bomb , which warned of the devastating effects the spiraling human population has on the planet’s resources. Of course, pollution and the depletion of natural resources have not been the only environmental concerns since that time: dwindling plant and animal biodiversity, the loss of wilderness, the degradation of ecosystems, and climate change are all part of a raft of “green” issues that have implanted themselves into both public consciousness and public policy over subsequent years. The job of environmental ethics is to outline our moral obligations in the face of such concerns. In a nutshell, the two fundamental questions that environmental ethics must address are: what duties do humans have with respect to the environment, and why? The latter question usually needs to be considered prior to the former. In order to tackle just what our obligations are, it is usually thought necessary to consider first why we have them. For example, do we have environmental obligations for the sake of human beings living in the world today, for humans living in the future, or for the sake of entities within the environment itself, irrespective of any human benefits? Different philosophers have given quite different answers to this fundamental question which, as we shall see, has led to the emergence
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Current news and politics is full of concern about the environment, particularly as it is related to oil use and the auto industry. There are a number of ethical considerations that arise out of these issues. Please be sure to answer ALL of the following questions:…
- 375 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Hoffman and Derr are both authors who have strong feelings about environmental ethics. They both make pretty strong arguments; however, they disagree on some points. In this essay I will further explain on what basis these authors disagree.…
- 806 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Quite often, environmental issues are discussed in terms of economic, political and/or social implications. Ethical issues, fundamental to the topic, are usually ignored. Failure to consider these issues is often understandable when the nature of pragmatic politics and economics is understood. Ethical positions are most often phrased as questions asking how we, as humans, relate to other humans individually, to other humans as groups, to other humans still to be born, to other forms of life and/or to entire sets ranging from ecosystems to the entire planet. Questions as to humans’ relations with nature are often raised as well as the relationship between technology and progress – for example, are gains from technological innovations mainly accrued by the wealthy and often at the expense of poor or dispossessed peoples? To what extent do technological innovations generate serious social and ecological problems? Is progress in meeting human needs always at the expense of nature? Is the biotechnology revolution in agriculture in the best interest of both humanity and nature? Questions such as these will be dealt with as our course proceeds during the semester.…
- 1973 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
William Baxter addresses the issue of pollution, using a human-oriented method by which all value assigned to flora and fauna is dependent on each entity’s benefits to humans. In this essay I will briefly explain Baxter’s anthropocentric approach, attempt to show the flaws in Baxter’s arguments, examine his possible recourse after revisiting these points, and then conclude by restating my stance regarding the importance of flora and fauna and the immorality of environmental pollution. Pollution is immoral not only because we have a duty to preserve the environment, but because according to Baxter’s own argument it in humanity’s necessary interests.…
- 1598 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The main idea of the book was that the perceived split between man and nature isn’t real and that your body is associated to the world around you. In Rachel Carson’s time, nature was considered to be an “it” and also man had a dominion over animals which some people took as permission to kill them without any guilt. Rachel Carlson highlighted that “we” humans are not distinct from “it” and we were dependent on the world around us. Rachel’s Carson’s book was a success as it raised awareness of the social hazards of DDT As of now pesticides have been increasingly regulated, and also safety standards for pesticides have been improved with much credit to Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring. This paper is based on the thesis is that Rachel Carson’s Silent spring was not only prescient in 1962 when it was first published but it remains…
- 1228 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In “Environmental Ethics, Hunting, and the Place of Animals,” Gary Varner examines how two varieties of sentientism, animal rights and animal welfare, “could address the specific ways in which they are alleged to be at odds with sound environmental policy” (Varner 858).Environmental ethics surfaced as a response to claims that anthropocentric thinking in ethics is the “root cause of environmental problems” (Varner 855). Sentiest views such as animal welfare and animal rights were favorable to some environmental ethicists to “counter anthropocentrism” (Varner 855), but many believed “that an adequate environmental ethic had to be holistic; [meaning] it had to attribute intrinsic, noninstrumental value to entities such as species and ecosystems … [unlike] both animal welfare and rights views, [where] only the lives of conscious individuals have intrinsic value” (Varner 855). Furthermore, environmental ethicists “claim that…
- 1171 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
It can be argued that human instinct is an ever evolving characteristic that is never always in sync with that of nature. Human’s have the ability and sometimes the burden to understand and comprehend what is happening to him and his surroundings. One thing that is consistent with Human instinct is that the level of understanding and the ability to adapt to one’s surrounding has both different points of views and attitudes towards what direction one should progress. What should the humans do to live sustainably?In Wendell Barry’s Getting along with Nature, Berry feels that change begins with the realization of interdependency between nature and humans. In The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garret Hardin, the population is the greatest evil facing sustainability. Hardin and Berry are the quintessential polar opposites in regards to their own personal perceptions, human nature, and faith in society but if we could meld these two minds then the idea of sustainability could become a reality.…
- 2494 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
"Save the Planet," "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle," "Go Green." Quotes like these have become a commonality in today's age. We all are familiar with the large efforts to help preserve the environment. In "Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environments," Thomas E. Hill Jr. sums up his essay by stating, "The point is not to insinuate that all anti-environmentalists are defective, but to see that those who value such traits as humility, gratitude, and sensitivity to others have reason to promote the love of nature" (688; par. 4) This excerpt provides the thesis behind Hill's argument. The author found that it is difficult to make a convincing argument to show that destroying the natural environment is immoral, so he raised a different question that aims towards the person who commits the act and not the act itself. He wanted to explore what committing these acts revealed about a person's character (682; par. 3). In response to Hill's dissertation, I came to an unexpected conclusion. While I normally feel that arguments such as this are frivolous and a waste of time, Hill's argument got me thinking in a different way. In the beginning, I was on the opposing end of his critique. However, throughout the reading, there was a gradual shift in my thinking that led me towards Hill's viewpoint. By the end of the essay, I found that I agreed with the author. Several key points in the reading support and give merit to his thesis. These claims provide a basis to my reasons for supporting Hill's argument.…
- 1575 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Throughout time, American attitudes towards the importance of the environment have lessened. American farmers have begun to use poisons, such as parathion, which has begun killing animals and humans. Rachel Carson, a noted biologist, published her novel Silent Spring in 1962, in which she illustrates the need for American attitudes towards the environment needing to change, through understanding “plain folks”, an accusing tone, and descriptive imagery.…
- 674 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Witcombe, J., & Sanchez, J. (2004). Food systems and security helping the poor cope. Retrieved from http://www.id21.org/health/InsightsHealth5art3.html…
- 1058 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This is as easily extended to a policy of strict conservation or preservation as it is to resource exploitation, as each of these positions would be in some regard good for humans. From a strong anthropocentrist view, one might “have no interest in preserving penguins for their own sake; penguins are important because people enjoy seeing them walk on rocks.” (Clowney & Mosto, 335) The environmental position here is still that penguins are important. Strict adherence to strong anthropomorphism does not disqualify a person from classification as an environmentalist; in fact with very few exceptions, environmentalists still value human needs and desires and moral concern above those of an individual non-human, which is the fundamental assertion of weak anthropomorphism. Biocentrism offers a much expanded definition of moral standing and intrinsic value; extending these characteristics from humans to all and only individual living things. This concept, in conjunction with the slightly less expanded sentio-centrism of Peter Singer and Tom Regan and the further-expanded moral consideration of the biotic community inherent in ecocentrism and deep ecology, more explicitly defines the moral obligations of humans with regard to environmental policy. The concept of radical equality is perhaps the most contentious claim of biocentrists; however it is neither necessary nor detrimental to the usefulness of biocentric reasoning to environmentalism. All of these positions make definitive claims as to what ought or ought not be done, and though they rely on different reasoning, they agree on appropriate courses of action in most cases. Philosophically the differences here are, undoubtably, significant and worthy of exploration and debate. In the context of modern environmentalism and public policy, however, these fundamentally distinct philosophies work together toward…
- 1426 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In America today, many people do not realize the impact they have on the environment. We come from a more educated generation, yes, but many people do not realize, that even just recycling can led to less deforestation, and ensuring that the environment of many animals is still there and safe. Much like how deforestation can negatively affect animals, it negatively affects us, less trees means less oxygen, and less oxygen, less to breathe, causing more. In Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson, she attempts to enlighten the reader on how the use of pesticides has an overall negative effect on the environment, animals and humans. Carson draws this conclusion based on her belief that humanity is ignorant, and that we are under the false impression that we are in some way superior. Following this she also suggests that we, as humans, are victimizing nature, and attempting to cure it like a disease.…
- 979 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Rachel Carson’s “The Obligation to Endure” was a successful persuasive approach to opening society's eyes to environmental issues. In “The Obligation to Endure”, Rachel Carson writes about the earth and how it has adapted to environmental changes in the span of millions of years. “Only within the moment of time represented by the present century has one species-man- acquired significant power to alter the nature of his world” (Rachel Carson 267). Carson states that mankind has done some irreversible damage to the earth in a very small amount of time. I find it appalling to see how destructive we have been within a matter of a couple hundred years. The effects of human production of many new chemicals and pesticides and the style that society…
- 1626 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
(1) Introduction: The Early Development of Environmental Ethics: If putting out natural non man made fires, culling animals and or killing off some individual members of overpopulated indigenous species was necessary for the protection and the integrity of a certain ecosystem. Would these actions be legal morally permissible or even required? Is it morally acceptable for farmers in non-industrial countries to practice “slash and burn” techniques to clear areas for agriculture? Beginning in the early 1960s, the questioning and rethinking of the relationship of human beings with the natural environment reflected an already widespread perception in that the late twentieth century faced a “population time bomb” and a serious series of environmental crisis. Historian Lynn White Jr, wrote an article called “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis”, on a much-cited essay published in 1967 on the historical roots of the environmental crisis argues that the main strands of Judeo-Christian thinking had encouraged the overexploitation of nature by maintaining the superiority of humans over all other forms of life on…
- 1382 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Consequences of Climate Change: Consequentialism and Environmental Ethics A somewhat commonly held concern is that consequentialism is an inadequate moral theory for tackling the issue of climate change. In this paper I will argue that consequentialism can successfully respond to climate change by, at times, evaluating the morality of character traits instead of actions. First, I will provide a couple major objections that consequentialism must overcome if it is to be successful in addressing the issue of climate change. Next, I will outline what a response to these objections would require.…
- 1276 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays