Preview

Wyeth Vs Levine Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
187 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wyeth Vs Levine Case Study
In a recent ruling in 2009, Anthony M. Kennedy took part in a 6-3 ruling with other justices in the case of Wyeth v. Levine. Diane Levine filed a personal injury claim against a drug manufacturer named Wyeth, stating that because they had failed to properly label their product her arm had to be amputated. The plaintiff injected Phenergan, a drug used to prevent allergies and motion sickness into her arm. Due to complications from this injection, her arm had to be amputated. The Supreme Court of Vermont ruled in favor of the plaintiff (Ms. Levine). The court confirmed that the FDA imply provides the ground work for regulation in each state but each state is free to create stricter labeling requirements.
This decision was probably felt across

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Fda Research Paper

    • 2368 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Americans must wait up to 19 years after a discovered treatment before they can participate in benefits of a new medication (Philipson & Sun, 2008). The regulatory process drug manufacturers need to endure before releasing potentially life-saving medication is an extremely expensive, time-consuming process. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) is the main department of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) responsible for the safety of drugs (both prescription and over-the-counter) sold in the United States (Food and Drug Administration, 2011). This department scrutinizes the testing of new drugs and determines if they are safe and effective before distribution. They do not perform in-house testing themselves; they only evaluate the testing done by the manufacturer to make sure the drug claim is accurate and that the benefits of the medication out way the side-effects (Food and Drug Administration, 2011). Whereas the FDA’s regulation and oversight protects dangerous products from circulation, the approval process hinders manufacturers’ ability to release drugs in a timely manner because of the legal and cost liability, thus preventing the availability of treatment to Americans.…

    • 2368 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following a bench trial, the trial court awarded Melissa Cooper damages on her claims of breach of promise to marry, fraud, and attorney fees. Without having moved for a directed verdict in the trial court, which limits his possible recourse to a new trial, Christopher Ned Kelley raises five enumerations of error, including that a promise to marry is not enforceable when the parties are in a meretricious relationship. We find no error and affirm.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would like to recommend Takeem Witter as a candidate for the position in correspondence with a Mental Health Tech at your organization. His employment with the Marion Regional Detention Center started on December 13, 2013 and ceased on April 7, 2017. Moreover, during his employment with the Department of Juvenile Justice,Takeem Witter has demonstrated vital qualities that speaks volumes in terms of his character. Not only does he possess an innate ability to convert colossal matters into desirable outcomes, but he also maintains his composure in the most hostile situations. Strictly speaking, this is one of the primary reasons Takeem was deemed dependable, principled, and patient while employed with DJJ.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defendant Wycoff murdered his sister and brother-in-law, El Cerrito attorneys Julie and Paul Rogers. Victims were stabbed and bludgeoned to death with a knife and wheelbarrow handle.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What are the significant differences between the Quinlan, Cruzan, and Wenland cases? Why are these three cases important? In the case of Quinlan, her wishes had been made known by previous oral and written statements she had made. In this case her father was the surrogate speaking her wishes and fighting the courts systems who had ruled against his decision to remove her respirator. This was then overturned on the grounds of the constitutional right to privacy covers the decisions of formerly competent patients whose legal surrogates may speak for them, when they no longer can. She did not die when her respirator was taken off, she continued to breathe on her own. The family did not want her tube feeding removed because they thought she would suffer.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Medicines Company

    • 868 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Medicines Company Case Write-Up: Terence Cho, Felipe Duarte, Aleks Loiko, Robert Shaw, and James Wang…

    • 868 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world is full of camera phones, different social media outlets, and the work of law enforcement is not hidden anymore, the general public can see the police officers performing their jobs. However, those officers quick to use gun or Taser lack the skills in de-escalation when dealing with a minor hostile situation. Nevertheless, the case of Bryan v. McPherson was related to a situation of officer Brian McPherson and motorist Carl Bryan, which Mr. Bryan was pulled over and issued a citation early that same day and headed to southern California from Camarillo to Coronado.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal scholars and sociologists have debated the effectiveness of litigation and whether it is an effective tool for bringing social change to marginalized groups. Gerald Rosenberg is one of the legal scholars that believes that courts are ineffective due to the fact they are inherently constrained by political and constitutional limitations. According to his first perspective, Rosenberg believes courts by design are unable to hear social reform claims, courts lack independence from the political branches/public opinion and lack the power to implement their decisions (McCann 1992, 717). His second perspective the “dynamic court view” he argues that the dynamic court contains a judiciary that is powerful and can be starters of change, but not…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The medical field is filled with research and new or improved experimental treatments which require FDA approval for public consumption. Despite FDA approval these drugs are still not completely safe and therefore come with a variety of warnings and side effects. A question of fault sometimes arises when a user experiences a complication. That was precisely what happened with an injectable form of a drug called Phenergan. The Phenergan label advised extreme caution and provided a clear warning of what could happen if an artery was hit during injection.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hcs/430 Regulatory Agency

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The role and responsibility of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), most importantly, is to uphold the laws dictated by the government concerning products that include drugs, medical products, food, and non-health related products and to protect and promote public health across the country. This essay focuses on several aspects of the FDA, from the role of the agency and its effect on health care in the United States, to the authority this agency carries in relation to health care. There will also be an explanation of how the FDA carries out these responsibilities on a day-to-day basis. The FDA has held a strong presence in the realm of public health since 1848 when it began as a consumer protection agency (FDA, 2013). The FDA, formed after the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act was put in place and inspired by the scientific work of Harvey Washington Wiley, who was the Chief Chemist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Wiley worked to eliminate the dangerous practices of marketing unregulated drugs and food products to consumers (FDA, 2013). Since that time, the FDA has become a powerful force, monitoring and working to protect public health in the United States.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States rendered its choice, deciding that Dred Scott was as yet a slave in March of 1857. Much more disputably, the Court decided that the Missouri Compromise was illegal; that all blacks, free or oppressed, would never be United States subjects, and that Congress did not have the privilege to choose the bondage question in the regions. This stacked choice, which should settle the servitude question for the last time and all the more significantly relieve the country's developing sectional emergency, wound up making more strain in the nation between the North and South. The response to the choice changed by district and political gathering, with it being scrutinized by northerners and Republicans, and commended by southerners and…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust FDA

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Your standing in line at your local drug store, head killing you, your face feels like it’s ready to explode, and you cannot breathe if your life depended on it. In short your allergies are making your life unbearable, and you are completely out of Sudafed. When you finally arrive at the pharmacist and ask for a box, you are asked for your driver’s license and then promptly turned away. Recent laws have you waiting one more week before purchasing anything that contains pseudoephedrine or ephedrine. Disgruntled and in pain, you walk away and as you leave the store you overhear the cashier tell a customer “instead of buying a pack a day, why don’t you just buy a carton?” Right about now the FDA’s “…goal of a healthier, safer nation…” ("Overview Of The FDA Mission", 2007) does not feel so accurate. The FDA’s regulations are unjust, because they place corporate profits above consumers’ safety, ban proven natural beneficial health medications, and allow the public’s lifestyle demands to alter their mission.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Dred Scott decision of 1865 had many implications on the status of free blacks in the United States, along with the concept of popular sovereignty, and the future of slavery in America.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical problems within hospitals and other facilities has been an ongoing issue for around 35 years. With the fast growth of technology and new medicine, the financial structures that could possibly create more financial concerns. The organizational effects of these issues will start looking at the quality of health care. In the economy, the demand from consumers and the production costs will help guide and form a firm structure. Many health care organizations need to use good thinking tasks to make proper decisions. More issues include: patient autonomy, termination of patient treatment, advance directives, confidentiality, and informed consent.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1993 Supreme Court case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, like many high-profile court cases, set a precedent for future court causes of a similar background. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was a pharmaceutical company based out of Kansas City, Missouri which was founded in 1950. Originally named “Marion Laboratories” after its founder Ewing Marion Kauffman, Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals specifically developed pharmaceuticals that had yet to be marketed by other pharmaceutical companies after being discovered and researched. As a result, Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals are credited for producing several high-quality and extremely popular drugs even in modern day, including the Nicorette anti-smoking gum and Cepacol mouthwash. However, in an attempt to receive credit for popular and effective pharmaceutical production over other companies, Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals earned a reputation of producing drugs without sufficient research of potential side-effects. As a result, Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals were I involved in an extremely high-profile U.S. Supreme Court case, titled “Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. This 1993 court case put pressure on the pharmaceutical company to close their doors and sell the company just three years later in 1996.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays