Preview

Would euthanasia ever be justified?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
952 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Would euthanasia ever be justified?
Tessa Stepa
HCP/PHI120
Euthanasia
Would euthanasia ever be justified? Should we listen to what the patient would want? Should we put ourselves in the patient 's place? Should we do to others what we would want done to us? The answers to these questions are not as easy as it may seem. This is because many moral issues are involved. Everyone dies eventually. When it happens, however, it is not the same for all of us. For some, it is fast and almost painless. For others, however, it comes with what seems like endless suffering. Also, the patient is not the only one who is hurting. The patient 's family and friends suffer. With all this being said, euthanasia looks like a good solution. Euthanasia is morally permissible. Euthanasia comes in two forms: active and passive. "Active euthanasia is direct killing and is an act of commission. Passive euthanasia is an act of omission"(Munson, 579). In addition, these two forms can be further broken down: voluntary, involuntary, and nonvoluntary. The debate happens when we have to consider all the possible combinations. There is a lot of gray areas. It is illegal to kill someone. However, it is not illegal to let someone die. Of course, these laws are not always black and white. There are certain situations where these laws do not hold up. For example, it is not illegal to kill someone if you are protecting yourself. Also, it is wrong to let someone die without trying to help them. These circumstances can create quite a debate for some people. Many people cannot take measures to perform euthanasia for themselves. These same people are very close to death and in a lot of pain. John Lachs said that " Callahan fails to grasp the moral problems leading people to consider euthanasia. They are not interested in it as an escape from the suffering inherent in the human condition, but as an end to pain and a burdensome life" (Munson, 601). These people are suffering from diseases and illnesses who do not think that living like this



Cited: Munson, Ronald. Intervention and Reflection. Company, 2011. Pat Milmoe McCarrick, . N.p.. Web. 24 Mar 2014. <https://bioethics.georgetown.edu/publications/scopenotes/sn18.pdf>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    With that being said, there are two main types of euthanasia called active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia describes actively attempting to end a patient’s life by means of drugs or a lethal injection. Passive euthanasia is defined as removing or withholding a medicine or treatment that could have prolonged the patient’s life. Recently, there has been much debate on whether or not passive euthanasia is as morally wrong as active euthanasia. Some claim that passive euthanasia is not a direct violation of the basic good of human life, therefore it is morally permissible. They declare active euthanasia, on the other hand, is a direct violation, and therefore is not morally permissible. I will concede that this statement is technically true in a few rare situations, but in the majority of passive euthanasia cases, the patient is being taken off life support because he is tired of living and simply wants to die. And if that is the case, who’s to tell some terminally ill patient that he’s just going to have to live out his remaining days off treatment in pain and without hope. If a terminal patient wants to die, he should be accommodated not simply ignored. If some patients would like to refuse treatment, and live out the rest of their days naturally, that’s their decision too. It’s the patient’s life. Doctors should act on the requests of their patients, not what…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is a highly controversial topic in the field of medicine despite the American Medical Association currently endorsing one form of it. In order to explore the topic of euthanasia, I will put forth a case in which it is relevant. 80-year -old patient X is currently suffering advanced stages of pancreatic cancer. He is currently in a lot of pain despite being on the maximum amount of pain medication. Given his condition, patient X expresses that the pain is intolerable, and his last wish is to die painlessly and quickly.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debate around euthanasia is a tricky topic from the perspective of both patients and doctors. Should it be allowed, and if so, when is it appropriate to practice? Should doctors be held to moral standards when practicing euthanasia, and if so, which ones? Is killing a patient any different than letting a patient die? Daniel Callahan has responded to philosophers such as James Rachels in his article, “When Self-Determination Runs Amok,” and insists that recognizing the moral distinction between killing and letting die is crucial in evaluating whether euthanasia is permissible. Callahan discusses how euthanasia should not be permitted under any circumstances based on three important turning…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living is more valuable than dying and threatening to diminish the value of life is dangerous. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is the practice of doctors intentionally ending a terminally ill patient’s life in what is purportedly a gentle and dignified manner. The term originated in ancient Greek and means “easy death.” Doctors perform euthanasia by administering lethal drugs or by withholding treatment that would prolong the patient’s life. Physician-assisted suicide is also a form of euthanasia, but the difference between the two methods is that in euthanasia, doctors end the patient’s life with lethal injections, whereas, in physician-assisted suicide, patients kill themselves with a lethal amount of drugs prescribed by the doctors.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A topic that has been around a while is physician-assisted suicide. James Rachels, an ethicists, believes a person who is virtually certain to die within a given amount of time and is experiencing or will experience a lot of pain before he or she dies should be able to choose an earlier, less painful death (Mosser, 2013). People have a right to end their life whenever they choose because some people living with a terminal illness do not want to suffer, there may not be anything the doctors can do to help them have a comfortable death, and it is their life and they have the right to make that decision.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In at least some cases, active euthanasia promotes the best interest of everyone concerned and violates no one’s rights, therefore, at least in some cases, active euthanasia is morally permissible.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 249) This is the strongest argument for active euthanasia in my opinion. Those who oppose this argument may claim that euthanasia is not in the best interests of all parties involved. The parties referenced are usually the friends/family/doctors and their grief over the situation or even the hospital and its shareholders losing money from the patient. First off, any person who wants to keep a family member alive who is in extreme pain for the sole reason of wanting to prolong being able to interact with them or to offset their own period of suffering following the family member’s death is incredibly selfish. The logical conclusion would be that family and friends of the patient would be relieved by their quick and early passing because of the avoidance of a month of suffering. Yes, of course the family and friends of the patient will experience emotional trauma from the passing of their loved one, but in due time the loved one you will pass whether they like it or not. Second, when it comes to financial losses to the hospital and its shareholders, those who would put monetary gain over the wellbeing of another human being have…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument needs to be settled so people can either go through the process or not even have the option. If patients cannot obtain euthanasia then there needs to be more ways that will ensure patients less pain and suffering for them. IN the future, hopefully the Unites States will legalize euthanasia or find a better alternative than euthanasia that will allow patients to die with dignity. People of the United States and all over the world cannot live in fear of what might be right or might be wrong, chances need to be taken to understand and develop more. To end with is a quotes from “Doctor Death, Jack Kevorkian, and “My ultimate aim is to make euthanasia a positive experience.” (Euthanasia…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia is derived from a Greek term meaning “good death”. It is the painless killing of a patient who is suffering. A couple of examples of suffering can be the result of a painful disease or in an irreversible coma. In most countries, euthanasia is illegal. Only three states in the United States allow euthanasia. These three states are Oregon, Washington, and Montana. Individuals with a severe debilitating or terminal medical illness should be allowed the option for doctor assistance suicide or voluntary euthanasia.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is defined in Webster's Dictionary as "the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reason of mercy (Webster's Dictionary 401). The Hemlock Society defines it as "justifiable suicide, that is rational and planned self-deliverance". The word euthanasia comes from the Greek- eu, which means good and thanatos death. No matter what your definition, euthanasia is ethical, and physicians should be allowed to assist in it legally (Derek Humphry, 18).…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The moral issue that I will discuss about is Euthanasia. Euthanasia simplu means bringing the death of another for the benefit of that person and also known as mercy killing. “When a person carries out an act of euthanasia, he brings about the death of another person because he believes the latter's present existence is so bad that she would be better off dead, or believes that unless he intervenes and ends her life, it will become so bad that she would be better off dead” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). There are two forms of euthanasia; voluntary and non-voluntary. Voluntary euthanasia means if it’s coming from the patient him or herself. Non - voluntary means a family member making the decision for the patient. In an active euthanasia which is illegal, it is saying that you are performing direct action to take someone’s life. In a passive euthanasia which is legal, it is allowing someone to die by not performing some life sustaining action. What does euthanasia has to do with morality? My morality behind euthanasia is that euthanasia should be the right to die for patients who are intensely ill. Euthanasia is natural in a way because in real life, there is a matter of life and death. It is natural for people to live but death is also part of nature. No one can live forever, and since euthanasia is performed on people facing serious illness and facing death. Euthanasia seems to understand the course of nature and its ways by letting the patient wish be fulfilled and let them die in peace instead of suffering in pain.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladies and gentlemen, my argument for the moral justification of euthanasia rests on the premise of mercy and compassion, two ideals which are essential to human dignity. In most cases when a person requests euthanasia they are suffering unrelenting and continual pain, and there is no reasonable possibility of substantial recovery. It is morally repugnant to watch another person suffer through humiliating helplessness and constant pain when one could prevent it. It is widely considered humane to put animals that are permanently…

    • 830 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons why Euthanasia is wrong. I’m just going to name a few. First is because it doesn’t just effect the person choosing it, it also effects the family of the person choosing assisted suicide . Also another reason that euthanasia is wrong is because if you do choose assisted suicide you never know what’s going to happen after that moment. For all that you know it could get a whole lot better than what you are at that moment. The last but definitely not least is that Euthanasia denies the patients the final stage of growth.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antigone

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people who are diagnosed with incurable diseases want to be able to die gracefully and on their own terms but are not permitted to do so. Reasons like this are why assisted suicide should be legalized for people with incurable diseases. Euthanasia should be a right granted to all citizens who are suffering from a degenerative, fatal, or painful condition that would enable them to enjoy their lives as healthy people do. There is much controversy on this subject, and frankly, it should not be up for discussion. It is not up to society to make decisions that infringe upon the rights of the physically ill. Firstly, it would allow the ill to practice their rights, it would grant doctors the opportunity to do their primary job in society, which is helping people. Euthanasia would save money that could be better spent on other fields of medicine. Lastly, assisted suicide should be legal in order to give patients the ability to decide their own fate. Furthermore, having the option to physician assisted suicide allows the patient to maintain control over his or her situation and to end life in an ethical and…

    • 4225 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays