Worldview In One Lord, One Faith And One Baptism

The third criterion by which worldviews should be evaluated is coherence. A worldview is not genuine unless it has clarity. Any worldview needs to be clear on what it is representing. For instance, a Christian worldview has solid lucidity. We believe in One Lord, One Faith and One Baptism, this is crystal clear. To be far lucidity is not just coined to one worldview simply because some can claim that Christianity is the best worldview. Another can determine that postmodernism is a better worldview because it rejects absolute truth. Lastly, some could say epistemology worldview is more appropriate because it is more lucid or coherent in its arguments. Whatever the clearer reasons, anyone can choose any of the prior three worldviews. Each must make sure their analysis is clear in what, who, and why they believe the worldview in questioned.
Factual Adequacy The fourth criterion to evaluate a worldview is factual adequacy. Factual adequacy evaluates the historical and empirical dimensions of life. Factual adequacy simply means that a worldview may be internally
“The simple fact is that there are many different, mutually exclusive answers given to religious questions.” Christianity is the only religion that has the claim of a living Redeemer, who has proven to have risen from the dead and there is infallible proof to back such claims. Since no man, today can explain these claims nor disprove them. Why not give Jesus a try? What does one have to lose? One should consider this, If God is not real and the penalty for not accepting his Son is eternal separation, why not? If Christian alternative is correct, and I believe it is. When you die, and we all will die, and find out God does not exist, we have lost nothing; but if God does exist and we die without accepting Jesus Christ and living the redeemed life, then we have lost