Preview

Workable Ethical Theories

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
626 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Workable Ethical Theories
When the time comes to make a decision it is sometimes a struggle. Many times we see ourselves deciding between following our heart or our conscience. The chapter 2 of the book “Ethics for the information age” addresses to this issue very carefully. This chapter talks about Workable Ethical Theories such as Kantianism, Act Utilitarianism, Rule Utilitarianism, Social Contrast Theory, and others. If I had to choose one of the workable ethical theories in chapter 2 and use it for all my personal ethical decision making, I would choose Kantianism. According to the book “Ethics for the information age” by Michael J. Quinn (2014), Kantianism, an ethical theory of the German philosopher Immanuel Kant, is able to go beyond simply stating that an action is right or wrong by citing chapter and verse; a Kantian can explain why it is right or wrong. I felt more towards the Kantianism because of the aspects that these theory covers.
…show more content…
I consider this conclusion very powerful statement, and I totally agree. For instance, many people may consider getting knowledge or being smart a good thing. However, if a wrong person happens to have these abilities, it may not be a good thing. Another issue in our society that I would relate with these principle is the gun control laws. A great number of people support that everyone should have access to guns and it is not dangerous, while others strictly disagree with this idea saying that it may promote violence. However, I myself, believe that the problem is not weather everyone should have access to guns or not. The problem is not the accessibility because a gun in the hand of a good person may promote some good to the society. In the contrary, a gun in the hands of the wrong person may result in a catastrophe. Therefore, having access to guns is not bad nor good; As Kant used to ask, “What is good without

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The contents of this paper will analyze the GM ignition case using several concepts taught in ethics. This will include a background of the issue as well as a detailed evaluation of the decision by GM from the utilitarianism and Kantian perspective. This will show that GM’s decision was morally wrong as well as prove that GM should be held morally responsible for their actions.…

    • 3185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical theories are all different but some have similar views. Ideas change over time and the theories above prove that. The moral rightness of an outcome is best described as utilitarianism. The moral rightness of an action, regardless of the outcome, is best described as duty ethics. These two are opposites because one focuses on the action and one focuses on the outcome only. Duty ethics has two imperative commands that are important and necessary to follow if you want to be rational. Utilitarianism is all about happiness and producing the greatest amount of happiness. Of course, this is not always good because happiness is not everything. Utilitarianism sort of ignores human rights and virtues. Duty ethics is considered too strict for…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several ethical theories are available for study, while there are differences among them there are also many similarities. This paper will discuss the similarities and differences in Virtue Ethics, Utilitarianism, and Deontological ethics.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before I go about pitting these two systems against each other, however, it would be best to first give you a (hopefully) sufficient understanding of what composes each respective ethical theory, so that you can better follow the comparison ant critique of the theories later on. First, let us take a look at Kant's system of ethics, which is based on the notion of duty. For Kant, this duty was something that had to be motivated from something that was larger than yourself and your emotion; it had to be drawn from an objective place, and with the right intentions in mind. Have you ever heard the adage that goes “doing the right thing for the wrong reason”? That would apply perfectly to Kant's theory. The result's of one's actions mean nothing if the intentions are selfish in nature. To Kant, intention was perhaps even more important than the results of your actions, due to the fact that one can not always have full control over the ends of their intentions (intentions that, in order to be in accordance to…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual actions are to support the goal of protecting the United States as a whole. A soldier who qualifies as an expert with the M-4 rifle is an example of virtue theory. The excellence of this soldier will increase the effectiveness of the team or company similar to utilitarianism. Obeying a direct order is part of the foundation of the Army. Shooting to kill in combat can go against an individual’s morals and ethics but deontology states duty is the primary factor regardless of individual belief.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good And Evil Casablanca

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many different viewpoints on what is right and wrong and ethically and morally correct. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and Jon Stuart Mill (1806-1873), both considered to be two of the best philosophers of all time, had different views on how one should live the Good Life. John Stuart Mill’s theory was called Utilitarianism and Kant’s theory, the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first ethical theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that describes how the moral value or worth of an action is determined by how much benefit is gained from that action. It is measured by not only the amount of benefit gained but also the amount of people with benefits in the process. This theory hopes to provide guidance when choosing a course of action. Utilitarianism is divided into two groups based off of how they apply the theory. A Rule Utilitarian believes that the action is right if it results in happiness of great benefit (Munson, 2009). For example, the commandment, “thou shall not kill” is very straight forward and doesn’t leave room for interpretation. Someone who follows Rule Utilitarianism would strictly follow this rule by never committing murder or killing any living creature. An Act Utilitarian would decipher the commandment according to its greatest benefit. Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action is right if it is better than all of the other options as long as it yields the best results. In other words, there may be situations in which breaking the rules may be the best option. Breaking the commandment, “ thou shall not kill” may seem wrong when looking at it from the surface, but if it is done to save the life’s of others it may yield the best result. The absolute that applies to Utilitarianism is the Bible. 2 Corinthians 9:7 says, “Each one must give as he has decided in his heart; not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves…

    • 1598 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The long debated question of the importance of men and women and their roles has raged on for years. Should men and women be treated equally, that truly is the question that seems to have more answers than resolution. Applying the question to Deontology and the work of Immanuel Kant, the answer would be all people regardless of gender should be treated equally. However, these theories do not take into account the actions of the male or female in question. The question still remains, should men and women be treated equally or should it be based on the situation, all accounts will be taken into further consideration.…

    • 756 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The deontological/Kantian ethical-decision making philosophy was created by the philosopher Kant. His view on ethical-decision making is about how we morally commit an act or decide on something in the sense of obligation. Kant indicates that ethics is about acting upon our own duty, essentially doing what we ought to do. This philosophy is solely about duty. For example, one can say that “I ought to do my homework”, in this case it would be my duty do my homework in order to get a good grade. Another proposition is, following a maxim when it comes to acting on an action out of oughtness. This maxim one may have is like a policy that one will follow by, when a particular situation or event arises.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virtue Ethics as a “different approach to morality” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 124), was distinguished from the other ethical theories as one that “is concerned with those traits of character that make one a good person” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 125). In contrast with the other ethical theories that “are concerned with how we determined what is the right things to do” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 124), “virtue ethics asks how we ought to be” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 125).…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Worldviews

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why should the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few? What supreme debt does a given individual owe to the rest of humanity -- if any at all? As a species, humans have established a somewhat unusual innate sense of moral _________. Although said *beliefs* undergo mild fluctuations based on geographical location and political or religious upbringings, modern civilization appears to have developed a relatively unanimous _____ of ethical standards…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue Ethical Theory

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that virtue ethics is the most plausible ethical theory. It is the only theory that requires us to work better ourselves by cultivating virtues instead of giving a law to follow or because we value the outcomes. In addition, with today’s society being self-centered it is the theory that has the best chances of being accepted. A virtue is defined as the mean between the extremely good and extremely bad and arriving to that just middle take time, dedication, and patience. One does not own a virtue but a virtue defines who one is. Dedicating a lifetime to become better versions of ourselves is what we are already doing and virtue ethics is the theory with the path towards it.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stakeholder, pleasure v. pain, numerical model of Utilitarianism - Utilitarian analysis as per required model (See required Utilitarian model below)…

    • 9503 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays