Preview

Work of Taylor and Fayol Is Complimentary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Work of Taylor and Fayol Is Complimentary
Work of Taylor and Fayol was complimentary.

After going through the contribution made by both of these legends, we find that both of these are giving reflection of aiming increase in efficiency. Definitely the work of Taylor and Fayol is complimentary. Realizing the problem of human resource and their management at all levels they attributed this fact to be the key in the success of business.
Both of them recognized the behavioral side of management; however they did not emphasize the human dimension. Both of them worked on the scientific aspect of the problem. While Taylor worked primarily on the operative level from the bottom of the organizational hierarchy upward, Fayol mainly concentrated on Managing Director (his own term) & worked downward. Fayol laid down various tenets or principles of organization and management, while as the Taylor developed various strategies on work methods, measurement and simplification, to secure efficiencies. Both referenced and advocated the concept of functional specialization. They were of the thought that principles existed which would help in operating and administrating the organizations. This type of assertion validated a “one best way” approach to management thinking. Publishing there books, “Administrative Science” in 1916 by Fayol. And “Principles of Scientific Management” in 1911 by Taylor, both expressed their views and ideas regarding management practices. Stressing on the complete coordination & cooperation between Managers and Employees, both of them tried to mitigate the problems of workers & management at all levels. Being the two sides of the same coin both of these worked on the different aspects of the management. As with Henri Fayol, Fredrick Taylor also believed in the use of sanctions to punish disobedience in employees.
Both of them hailed from the classical era of Management that preceded today’s contemporary styles. The global market has changed since the early

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henri Fayol (1841-1925) was a mining engineer who later in his life preached concepts of management that could stem from his experience. One of them that is extensively applied in contemporary business management is the idea that “technical expertise can be destroyed by defective administration”. This in turn is understood and perceived that many organizations require a form of hierarchy, and degrees of command and accountability to function efficiently and effectively.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol vs. Mintzberg

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I intend to investigate both of these men, who are prolific names within management and organisational theory, and have some contrasting views, but also some similarities and development on Fayol’s theories. I will look at the pros and cons of each argument, and the similarities, then explain my view on the more effective management style.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand Fayol’s legacy and to be able to generalize from it, it is necessary to familiarize reader with it. As an early management practitioner and theorist, Fayol has been credited with laying the foundations upon which contemporary management theory and praxis has been built (Pryor and Taneja, 2010). He is best remembered for a three-fold contribution to management thought.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main difference between Taylors and Fayol’s approaches was that Taylor wanted to achieve increased organization efficiency by modifying the way in which workers carry out their tasks and Fayol on the contrary by modifying the way the organization is…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management and Work Place

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Taylor 's view of the reason for worker 's being inefficient in the workplace was that there was 'soldering ' or 'natural soldering ' which means that workers will always work at the pace of the of the slowest worker, so he had to devise a way for the to collectively all work faster. Or he believed that the workers inefficiency came from 'systematic soldering ' which meant that they were collectively conspiring to work as slow as possible. This is due to the fact that the pay was based on the number of hours worked rather than the output that they produced which Taylor saw as the problem. Taylor wanted through his methods to gain 'maximum prosperity ' not only for the firm which should be able to gain 'large dividends for the company and owner ' but also that the workers may have 'maximum prosperity ' for the employee so they may be able to do 'the highest grade of work the his natural abilities fit him '. It is so then argued that…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the “Essentials of Contemporary Management”, Jones and George claim that Taylor employed four principles to Increase efficiency in the workplace (1). They go on to state that Taylor originally outlined these principles to increase efficiency in the workplace which is supported in Taylors paper “The Principles of Scientific Management”, when he outlines his purpose as “The principal object of management should be to secure the maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for each employee.” (2) Taylor goes on in his paper to define his four principles and how he developed these ideas and how they can be used to develop better management techniques, Jones and Georges definitions and applications of these principles directly reflect those out lined in Taylors paper.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, it can be seen that Fayol’s principles in management have a significance influences on management…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is hard to discuss and examine Taylorism without a definition due to the specific type of management being interpreted wrong .The main concept of taylorism is the "separation of conception from execution", which in simple words means that the oganisation is broken down in simple and basic parts from the managers who do the thinking to the workers who do the doing. Taylorism orginated from a book he produced in 1909, named "The Principles of Scientific Management." Other than the main concept, he also furthered the hypothesis that employees and managers need to work together to achieve maximum efficiency. This was a new revolutionary type of management, it was very different to the way it was done in organisations previously. A factory manager during this period of history had extremely little contact with his employees, and he left them on their own to produce the necessary product, this still occurs in some companies like many call centres around the world still to this day. Also during this time, employees key motivation was usually to continue working there, however there was absolutely no incentive to work and produce quickly and efficiently. In…

    • 3275 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    1.Both are Pioneers:Taylor & Fayol are the two Pioneers in the evolution of management thought.2.Both pointed out problems of personnel: Taylor & Fayol both pointed out that the problem of personnel and its management at all levels is the ‘master-key’ to industrial productivity and progress.3.Both implied scientific approach: Both implied scientific approach and scientific method to solve the managerial problems.4. Success depends upon proper utilization of human resources: both had realized that success of a business enterprise depends largely on proper utilization of human resources.5.Stress on the technical and professional aspect: Both stressed on the technical or professional aspect of the management.6.Both are responsible for managerial revolution: Both are responsible for managerial revolution which took place after 1940. 7. Successful managers by profession: Both of them were initially successful managers by profession. They, therefore, approached this new science of management from a practical point of view. 8. Criticism for neglecting human psychology: Both approaches are criticized on the ground of neglecting human psychology. Behavior of the employees under different conditions is not studied in either of these theories. 9. Both wanted to secure maximum: both wanted to secure maximum from available resources.10. Both developed principle of division of work: Both of them developed the principle of division of work. Taylor introduced the principle of unity of command which was later developed by Fayol.11. Both opined that competent mgmt is necessary for success of business: both agreed that neither success nor failure is the result of the workers, contribution, competent mgmt is responsible for the success of the business and the failure of the business is the result of incompetent mgmt.12. Both used…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry Fayol was the first to propose a general theory of management. He defined theory as “a collection of principles, rules, methods, and procedures tried and checked by general experience.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    organizational management

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry Fayol created the administrative theory that focused in increasing productivity by improving efficiency and the attention is focused in the work methodology, the necessary movements to accomplish a task, standardized times for its accomplishments and in the worker's specialization. He talked about a team work without hierarchical positions and with the same opportunities to express ideas.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1.2. Fayol focused his Management Theory on efficiency through management training and behavioral characteristics. His writings provided guidance…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay outlines the main contributions of Taylor, Fayol and Mayo to the study of management. It then evaluates the contribution of these writers to management as it is practiced today. It does this by discussing in turn their work, explicitly and implicitly drawing comparisons between them. It argues that the various contributions reflect the differing circumstances and needs of the theorists, and are complementary in their contributions to modern management.…

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before the functions were cut down to only four, Fayol’s theory of management was seen to be most effective in any working environment. According to Fayol, planning must forecast the future and always expect the unexpected. Organizing should provide the structure of the organization and recruit, evaluate, and train all personnel. Commanding or leading as an effective manager is to provide supervision and inspire the inferior to work towards a common goal. Coordinating means that managers must match the procedures and activities performed by the company. To coordinate is to make sure that make sure that each activity of the organization complement each other. The last function or element is to control, this means that a manager must make sure that everything is within the organizations plan.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    F.W Tylor, the father of scientific management focused his attention on the problem of shop floor, while Henry Fayol concentrated on the problems of top management. He was first to formulate and develop the universal principle of administration applicable to both government and private administration. He is the original exponent of the functional principles of organisation. That is why he has been called Fayol, the Universalist.…

    • 3066 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics