This study examined the opinion of a little group of people in Bangkok about gender equality and focus on should women be equal to men or not? From the books and online data, give two aspects of it (women should be equal or not). The information bring from period time and the present time. Moreover, add supporting this research by comparison of equality between law and social values. It shows the one of controversial in everyday society. By objective and subjective questionnaire, everyone give their reason to support what they think about equality and suggest it.
Equality: Should women be equal to men?
Equality basically means access or provision of equal opportunities, where individuals are protected from being discriminated against. Discrimination in equality can occur in race, sex, health, religion, family structure, age, politics, disability, culture, sexual orientation or in terms of believes. And also meaning is the current term for ‘Equal Opportunities’. It is based on the legal obligation to comply with anti-discrimination legislation. Equality protects people from being discriminated against on the grounds of group membership. This was given definition by Westen (1983). Then, for equality under the law is refer to first constitution in 1974, section at 28. They prescribe that any basic right or freedom to which all human beings are entitled and in whose exercise a government may not interfere (including rights to life and liberty as well as freedom of thought and expression and equality before the law). Under the law, women and men have equaled. But in the past does not have constitution yet, people in that time only abide gender’s treat by physiological that women is weaker than men. And also in old culture that cultivate for long time, women must only learn about housework and men must only be leader, make money and make fame for family (Ussavech, 1992, p.11, 15). So, from this role show that women and men are inequality entirely. In the present time, there is constitution already. It prescribe that gender is equality. That’s make difference thinking in some women groups that should have equality in action and, women are as capable as men. Then, people should not discriminate because women seem weaker than men and abide the old culture. In contrast, the action in the past that people did for long time and were changed in nowadays by new generation’s thinking. It still ambiguous in fact, women and men should be equal or not. At first support, arguments in favor of such laws appeal to common sense. The most frequently cited argument is that the laws would promote national unity, which proponents consider all human to be equal. People are all humans with inherent dignity and should all be treated the same. Women and men individuals should most certainly be equal in their rights and opportunities and one gender should not be considered superior over the other as the genders have their certain strengths and it always varies from person to person. Gender does not completely define someone as an individual but also other characteristics such as their sexuality, personality and their own talents. Being the 21st century there is still signs of inequality, with women still being considered not equal to men. Sexual Objectification is a huge problem evident in advertising, music, films and other kinds of entertainment. Of course the general attitude the woman being the homemaker and stuff, but in Western society this attitude is slowly disappearing. Even though there are still signs of inequality in the workforce, in general social attitudes equality these days is the word on everyone's lips as women are more and more being regarded as equal to men, as they should be. Even though it is not to say men and women are different physically and mentally in certain aspects their dignity as a human being should be respected, this is also true for transgender individuals who can be...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document