Disparate Treatment of Women in Policing
This paper will analyze the disparate treatment of women in policing by exploring the attitudes and obstacles that women face in law enforcement, and by discussing why women are important to the changing role of police work. When law enforcement agencies represent the communities they serve it benefits the law enforcement profession and society as whole. The paper will address the question or problem: Women police officers experience disparate treatment. The research will address and identify the social causes and effects of how the occurrence of disparate treatment of women officers correlates with discrimination, sexual harassment, advancement limits and retention problems. This deductive research consists of a systematic process of collecting and analyzing information and has as its primary objective the advancement of knowledge and the understanding of the relations among variables of the observable occurrence under study. It is the function of the researcher to contribute to the understanding of the phenomenon and to communicate that understanding to others. STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
This research originates with a question or problem: Women police officers experience disparate treatment. The research will address and identify the social causes and effects of how the occurrence of disparate treatment of women officers correlates with discrimination, sexual harassment, advancement limits and retention problems. PURPOSE OF STUDY
The goal of this research is articulated as: it is a goal of society for law enforcement agencies to represent the communities they serve. In order to achieve this goal, it is important for law enforcement agencies to identify and address the adverse affects of disparate treatment of women in law enforcement. Research on the problem of disparate treatment of women officers in law enforcement follows a specific plan. The research begins with problem formation and a topic outline. The research design is explained in the introduction thesis and the outline defines the research question. The research divides the problem into sub-problems. A cause and effect analysis was chosen to identify the social causes and effects of how the occurrence of disparate treatment of women officers correlates with the subtopics of discrimination, sexual harassment, advancement limits and retention problems. Research objectives were guided by the cause and effect analysis of the problem by utilizing the analysis to formulate research question and hypothesis. The research objectives were guided by a literature review. A hypothesis is advanced about what is expected to happen in the research. The research is designed to look at the relationship between disparate treatment of women police officers and discrimination, sexual harassment, advancement limits and retention problems. This research is designed to assess the hypothesis, “Women police officers experience disparate treatment.” This research accepts certain critical assumptions. The research is meaningful because of the validity of the assumptions. The statement of assumptions as the foundation of the research is as follows, “This research is designed to assess the hypothesis that women police officers experience disparate treatment.” To understand the implications of these critical assumptions for theory and research, experiences and attitudes of sample groups of male and women officers were explored. A method and content analysis of survey data revealed conclusions which supported the hypothesis. Implications of the research of disparate treatment of women police officers will be discussed in the report findings and discussion.
This discussion incorporates other researcher’s views with a dialogue of how the literature review relates to the research being conducted. The research methodology will conceptualize the disparate treatment of women officers in law enforcement....
Cited: Senna, Joseph P., and Larry G. Siegel. (1999). Introduction to Criminal Justice (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, 2003 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004), 370.
Dorothy Moses Schulz, From Social Worker to Crimefighter: Women in United States Municipal Policing (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1995), 22.
Dorothy Moses Schulz, Breaking the Brass Ceiling: Women Police Chiefs and Their Paths to the Top (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 2004), 192.
National Center for Women and Policing, Equality Denied: The Status of Women in Policing, 2001 (Los Angeles: April 2002), 4.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, 2003 (Washington, D.C.:
National Center, Equality Denied, 7.
International Association of Chiefs of Police, “The Future of Women in Policing:” Mandates for Action (Alexandria, Virginia: November 1998), ii
Harrington and Lonsway (2006), "Current Barriers and Future Promise for Women in Policing," 507-508.
Lonsway, Dr. Kim, (2003). Hiring & Retaining More Women: The Advantages to Law Enforcement Agencies. Los Angeles, Ca: National Center for Women & Policing, a Division of the Feminist Majority Foundation.
Women 's Advisory Council to the Los Angeles Police Commission, “A Blueprint for Implementing Gender Equity in the Los Angeles Police Department” (Los Angeles: October 1993), 59-60.
Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, "Summary of Report," unpublished manuscript (1991): 3.
National Center for Women and Policing, Under Scrutiny: “The Effect of Consent Decrees on the Representation of Women in Sworn Law Enforcement” (Los Angeles: Spring 2003), [http://www.womenandpolicing.org/pdf/Fullconsentdecreestudy.pdf ]
Please join StudyMode to read the full document