Motivator : Everybody has their own opinions to who fired first at Lexington.
Thesis : My opinion is that the British were the ones who opened fire onto the colonial troops.
Blueprint : There is plenty of credible testimony, as well as an illustration that also leads to my conclusion.
First Body Paragraph :
Topic Sentence : First off, there are two very credible witnesses to the Battle of Lexington and Concord that very willingly admit to the Britist being the first to open fire.
Specific Support : John Parker, the chief of the militia in Lexington, states that he oredered, once he heard the British troops were approaching, “our Militia to disperse, and not to fire”
Specific Support : He then also recalls that his men were rushed upon, by the British, who then opened fire, killing eight of his men, without receiving any provoking from the militia in Lexington.
Second Body Paragraph :
Topic Sentence : A second witness to the Battle at Lexington and Concord was Simon Winship, he explains his experience the night of the battle.
Specific Support : He claims that he was riding his horse on the public road in Lexington, unarmed, when he was approached by the British troops and ordered to dismount his horse. When he asked why, he was removed from his horse by force. The commanding men ordered Winship to march with the troops. He refused, but somehow ended up marching with them for half of a quarter of a mile.
Specific Support : The troops were told to halt, prime and load their weapons. The troops then marched on until they came into contact with Captain Parker’s militia. He then recapped that an officer at the head of the said British troops, “flourished his sword, and with a loud voice, giving the word fire, which was instantly followed by a discharge of arms from said troops”. Winship accounts that he is positive that there was no discharge of arms from either side until the word fire was given by the said officer.
Third Body Paragraph :
Topic Sentence : The illustration of the Lexington and Concord Battle shows that the British destroyed the city and killed many people.
Specific Support :
Specific Support :
Concluding Paragraph :
Reworded Thesis :
Clincher :
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
He told of how he wasn’t quite sure who shot first in Lexington and could also tell you where they were in Concord and where the other group was also, that the other group retreated back to concord and came back with three to four hundred men, where his group was on the concord side of the bridge where he says they fired first not the other…
- 557 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This book contains the thoughts and communications between the British officers involved in the siege at Fort Pitt and the Battle of Bushy Run. This…
- 183 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In the essay “Foot Soldiers of the Revolutionary Army” by Gary B. Nash, the authors of the book tell of a Private Joseph Plumb Martin that kept a diary that details the life and hardships that the soldiers endured. Martin writes, “The army was now not only starved but naked. The greatest part were not only shirtless and barefoot but destitute of all other clothing, especially blankets.” (Gary Nash 124) The blacks were involved given the chance to receive freedom, which did not follow through completely. Although the colonies needed men for the army, these two simple sentences exposed the truth that people didn’t know at the time and even now.…
- 436 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the second chapter of his book 1776, David McCullough writes about how George Washington and his army prepared for and handled the siege of Boston. The purpose of talking about this occurrence is to show that the American army was indeed prepared to succeed against the British.…
- 523 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Hibbert’s narrative “Redcoats and Rebels” the British troops come toe to toe with the Colonial rebels. He accurately depicts history from the British point of view which is largely overlooked in American grade schools, where we are taught history in a rather biased way seeing that we are the victors of the war. He adds insight by adding key pieces of information…
- 216 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
History has cast aside the events of 1763 and focused on the bookends, the French and Indian War and the American Revolution. Ignored is a pivotal moment during the tumultuous year of 1763; the Fort Pitt Campaign where a British relief column, sent to relieve the besieged Fort Pitt, was attacked by a coalition of Indians. The event has been mostly ignored or forgotten by historians thus only few scholars have relegated attention to the campaign. In his article about the 42nd Regiment of Foot’s involvement in the battle, Ian Davidson notes that the battle is given little notice in the official battle honors of the regiment. Davidson, himself, is truly concerned about the 42nd’s involvement in the Battle of Bushy Run. David Dixon’s book, Never Come to Peace Again, provides a chapter retelling the event while Richard Middleton dedicates a few pages to the event in his book, Pontiac’s War.…
- 295 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
To begin with, there are two witnesses to the Battle at Lexington and Concord that openly admit to the British being the ones to first open fire. John Parker, the commander of the militia in Lexington, accounts that upon hearing that the British troops were approaching he gave orders to his men to “disperse and not to fire”. He then also recalls that his men were rushed by the British troops who opened fire and killed eight of their party without receiving any provoking from the militia in Lexington.…
- 473 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Said by leader of the Lexington militia, Captain John Parker. On April 19, 1775, gunshots were heard all around the world. We, the continental army and patriots were up against the world’s strongest nation in the Battle of Lexington and Concord. A British party, led by Major John Pitcairn who claims that the colonists were scaredy cats and will run away once seeing the British army, comes upon Captain John Parker’s army. Parker’s army faced with several armed redcoats back away to move home; only a few remain. The men of Lexington wait and wait till the British comes and then there it goes.. the shot fired from an unknown side resulted in a…
- 165 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
But that did not stop the colonists from resuming their attack The British, for their part, tried to keep the colonists at bay with flanking parties and canon fire. In the evening a contingent of newly arrived minutemen from Salem and Marblehead, Massachusetts, purportedly had a chance to cut off the Redcoats and perhaps finish them off. Instead, their commander ordered them not to attack, and the British were able to reach the safety of Charlestown Neck where they got help from the navel”.…
- 784 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Let us take a moment to examine the evidence which was solely based on eyewitness testimonies. According to Captain Preston, when he arrived to the commotion the crowd was still continuing to grow and becoming increasingly belligerent (Wheeler and Becker, 81). He then attempted to redirect both the crowd and…
- 719 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
apprentices gathered ,daring the sentry to fight . A squad of British soldiers came to support a sentry who was being pressed by a heckling ,snowballing crowd .,let loose a valley of shots .British soldiers in Boston opened fire on a group of American colonist killing five men .The Boston…
- 650 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Topic Sentence: James Moloney demonstrates the value of being loved through the character of Carl.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
What does Parker say the British troops did when they approached his militia?Troops made their appearance and rushed furiously, fired upon, and killed eight of our Party without receiving any Provocation therefor from us.…
- 642 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
"Don 't fire until you see the whites of their eyes" was a command given to the Americans to save their ammunition. The shots were fired on June 17, 1775 by about 2,400 British and 1,500 Americans. The British commanders were Lieutenant General Thomas Gage, General Artemas War, General William Howe, and Henry Clinton. The American leaders consisted of Peter Salem, Colonel William Prescott, Colonel Joh n Starks, and General George Washington. The British attacked at three different times, regrouping and refilling their ammunition at the intervals by Bunker Hill. The British attacked with both guns and cannons while the Americans only fought with guns. The Americans attacked here and there, and only retreated when they were out of gunpowder.…
- 332 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
On March 5, 1770, in Boston, Massachusetts, a mob of our patriotic colonists gathered around a British officer to confront him. The awful lad responded with violence! This fatal incident was caused by an uproar between our patriots and these British officers. This lethal massacre concluded with seven colonists dead, killing three on the spot.…
- 268 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays