Preview

Wikipedia: the Basis of Unreliable Sources

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wikipedia: the Basis of Unreliable Sources
Over the years that Wikipedia has been running, there has been a continuous debate on whether it is a reliable resource or not and no one has been able to come up with a conclusion. However, there are many people who think that they have come up with a compromise, which includes Wikipedia being a good source for basic information but not for the sole information of any given topic. Especially for college students, Wikipedia can get tricky in the sense where it is easy to just read through and agree with; however, it may be misleading and have incorrect information. People including college English instructor Jenny Meister, Marquette University Law School student blogger Jessica Slavin, and Internet executive Mark Moran can all agree that Wikipedia is helpful in college research but only for basic knowledge, not for sole information.
Throughout college, students must do a lot of book and computer research in order to do papers, class work and home work. The computer research is what scares professors the most because they know how easy it is for the students to click the first link that comes up on Google-Wikipedia. These students seem to get all of their information from the website, which can be edited by anonymous sources at any time. This means that the information is not always correct which can be frustrating to professors. “As someone who 's been there and done the grading thing, I can tell you that when a professor flips to your Works Cited page and glances over your list of sources, a page full of Wikipedia entries is going to spark a frenzy of eye-rolling and red pen” (Meister).
College students not only have to worry about having the wrong information in their school work, but also need to consider Wikipedia in their future careers. They must ask themselves how they should use it and the proper way to use it without hurting themselves. For example, law student Jessica Slavin had stated she was only going to use Wikipedia for background information. “I



Cited: page and glances over your list of sources, a page full of Wikipedia entries is going to spark a frenzy of eye-rolling and red pen” (Meister). College students not only have to worry about having the wrong information in their school work, but also need to consider Wikipedia in their future careers. They must ask themselves how they should use it and the proper way to use it without hurting themselves. For example, law student Jessica Slavin had stated she was only going to use Wikipedia for background information. “I will admit that I sometimes read a Wikipedia entry if I want background information about a topic. I do not think, though, that I would cite an entry as proof of anything in court” (Slavin). Wikipedia can be useful at times for background information about a topic, however, it can not be trusted because you are never sure who is writing it, if it is from a reliable source, or if the information is completely accurate. In Mark Moran’s blog about how Wikipedia is not reliable he makes one important point on why it should not be trusted for sole information. “In March 2009, Irish student Shane Fitzgerald, who was conducting research on the internet and globalization of information, posted a fake quotation on the Wikipedia article about recently deceased French composer Maurice Jarre. Due to the fact that the quote was not attributed to a reliable source, it was removed several times by editors, but Fitzgerald continued re-posting it until it was allowed to remain” (Moran). Moran is making the point that it is the contributor with the strongest agenda who “wins” and it is not always the one with the most correct information, which makes the site less reliable. For many years, Wikipedia has been known as an unreliable source and to be unused in school, although, it can be useful at times for basic information. Throughout college, students use Wikipedia as a main source which is giving them the wrong information in papers, class work, and school work, which is extremely frustrating for the professors to see. The students need to consider their future and if they would use Wikipedia as a primary source when they are at their future careers. College students should be allowed to use Wikipedia, but only as a basic information source in order to get background knowledge on a topic.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Howto Set Up Apa Style

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * When writing a research paper, you should never include Wikipedia as a resource, why is Wikipedia not consideration a credible source?…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my studies at Ashford University, I have found writing papers fun and gained an enormous amount of knowledge through the research involved. However, I do not just jump on google and use the first Wikipedia page that pops up. These types of searches can obtain inaccurate information that can be an absolute waste of time. This is why I am extremely grateful to have access to the abundance of valid research available in the Ashford University (AU) library.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia; providing facts, advice, and opinions from one or more contributors. Although it provides users with a vast amount of information there is often no citation for the facts, which does not allow the reader to confirm the credibility of the record. The mere fact that anyone can manipulate the content submitted allows some readers to challenge the website information as biased or fabricated. Credentials are an important aspect of research; providing information only on topics in which they publish on their website.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia does not have an apocalyptic view about this because its core audience knows the site very well and it has all the necessary experience to get exactly what they want. The loyal users use internal searches or they head directly to the page they want to see. This somehow works like in the case of the top affiliate networks. People know what they want and where they should go to find it.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Where can college students find some important data at the midnight when all the libraries close? The answer is: if they search on Google and they can get whatever they want. Doesn’t it sound pretty convenient while the student who gets in trouble? Absolutely! However, this kind of approach caused the college students to think less. Nicholas Carr says in the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid, “The more they use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing” (Is Google Making Us Stupid? 17). People are living with the help of the Google currently. Google is like a double-edged sword. It not only brings students good matters but also the bad things.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    dsfsdsfs

    • 4483 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Dear Wikipedia readers: We are the small non-profit that runs the #5 website in the world. We have only 175 staff but serve 500 million users, and have costs like any other top site: servers, power, programs, and staff. Wikipedia is something special. It is like a library or a public park. It is like a temple for the mind, a place we can all go to think and learn. To protect our independence, we 'll never run ads. We take no government funds. We survive on donations averaging about $30. Now is the time we ask. If everyone reading this gave $3, our fundraiser would be done within an hour. If Wikipedia is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online and ad-free another year. Please help us forget fundraising and get back to Wikipedia. Thank you.…

    • 4483 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the emergence of the internet as a resource center for students a question arises on the credibility of web based sites. In this paper we will debate the use of Wikipedia as a credible source of information.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thirdly, the writer explains how as a result of anyone being able to modify a post on Wikipedia, the chances of the user modifying his or her bias opinion is immensely high. The essayist also provides a definition of opinion making it clear to the reader that Wikipedia posts tend to be one-sided. Furthermore, Philip adds Wikipedia’s quote warning users “not to believe everything they read including the information on Wikipedia”. Philip then illustrates how political figures and subjects like abortion are slandered and vandalized on Wikipedia, making it harder for a student to find useful…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College life can be pretty stressful and complicate it at times. There are several things that can help college life become easier and more manageable. One of the main things and if not the most important it will be the ability to identify and separate credible online sources from non-credible ones. It is very true that technology has help make college life easier, with search engines such as Google or Bing at just one click away of distance. The only problem is that with so many choices to pick from how to tell if a source is even worth to look at without having to expend a great amount of time looking at each one through. Even though non-credible sources are easier to find, credible sources are more reliable because they are usually written by experts and have more substantial information in them. If we take a credible source like “Rising prevalence of cohabitation in United States may have partially offset decline in marriage rates” from the Family Planning Perspectives and compared against a non-credible sources like “Cohabitation in the United States” from Wikipedia, we can see that the article from the credible source has the components that help sort out a credible source from a non-credible.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons Wikapedia should be more censored is that Wikapedia sometimes post false information on their website. This occurs because anybody can post forums and other opinions on the website which is not checked to make sure that they are true. This makes it extremely difficult for high school and college students to research accurate information, which can effect themselves academically. This is also a problem for the public in general because there…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics