Preview

wikipedia is a reliable?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
847 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
wikipedia is a reliable?
Is Wikipedia a Reliable Source?
In the editorial, “Wikipedia” (2001), Wikipedia explains that Wikipedia is freely edit, multilingual, and free internet cyclopedia that it is supported by nonprofit Wikipedia foundation. Wikipedia supports its assertion by explaining how Wikipedia is an effort to create, and volunteers worldwide freely write their articles and using their own language. The websites purpose is to explain how Wikipedia can be used as reference data in order to anyone who can access any sites and can edit any of articles. Wikipedia has also become known as a new source because of the rapid data of articles related to breaking news. Wikipedia in the editorial, “Bruno Mars”, asserts that Bruno Mars is a one of the famous American singer and song writer as well. Wikipedia supports its assertion by explaining he is regard as a one of the successful solo artist. Wikipedia’s purpose is to inform about what his success story in order to know who he is. Wikipedia is an unreliable source for academic work because anyone can edit randomly onto this website for free and can change article’s information anytime. Moreover, main problem is still associated with the common contributors who are students rather than professors.
Wikipedia is most popular free encyclopedia sources, and it is an open encyclopedia based on the idea of Wikipedia as all readers are free to contribute if they have more information. Also contributor can randomly put information of any articles anytime, and they can change someone’s article correctly. Wikipedia explains, “Wikipedia allows outside editing except in particularly sensitive and/ or vandalism prone pages that are “protected” to some degree, even without an account readers can edit text without permission” (“Wikipedia” Sec.1.1). This means anyone can edit as long as the article information for free. Nevertheless, concern of using unreliable resource in various type of academic project is rising because most of contributions to an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Howto Set Up Apa Style

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * When writing a research paper, you should never include Wikipedia as a resource, why is Wikipedia not consideration a credible source?…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia; providing facts, advice, and opinions from one or more contributors. Although it provides users with a vast amount of information there is often no citation for the facts, which does not allow the reader to confirm the credibility of the record. The mere fact that anyone can manipulate the content submitted allows some readers to challenge the website information as biased or fabricated. Credentials are an important aspect of research; providing information only on topics in which they publish on their website.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia does not have an apocalyptic view about this because its core audience knows the site very well and it has all the necessary experience to get exactly what they want. The loyal users use internal searches or they head directly to the page they want to see. This somehow works like in the case of the top affiliate networks. People know what they want and where they should go to find it.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia can be beneficial to the academic student as well as the general researching public. Wikipedia covers an immense variety of topics that is continually maintained and updated, relevant, and non-biased in its presentation of information. Wikipedia possess all the qualities a reliable source would have. Wikipedia’s premise is promoting involvement of the general public for inputting information and continually adding into a comprehensive knowledge base.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    reliable resources

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This article displays careers available to accountant majors. It lists steps to take while job searching. Because I am majoring in accounting I decided to choose this journal to see fully what becomes available to me upon receiving my diploma. Within this article provides a detailed description of four workshops that focus on the accounting industry, specifically public accounting, non-public accounting, the recruiting process and professional certifications. Although it was not exactly what I was looking for it still answered many questions I had about what came after graduation.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mark Wilson’s article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”, Wilson argues that despite the legitimacy of Wikipedia, educators should engage and take part in helping shape the direction of Wikipedia. In a test published in the journal “Nature”, articles in Wikipedia are said to be as revered as those in the “Encyclopedia Britannica.” Since the perceived lack of academic authority, Wilson suggests that those with research specialties should enroll as editors of Wikipedia to add, control, and learn from the information being provided. Wilson describes his own interaction with Wikipedia and how he, his students, and other colleagues have benefitted from the use of it. From becoming a Wikipedia editor and a collaborator with other colleagues, Wilson has “in turn taught some people how to properly reference ideas and information.” Wilson expresses his ideas to involve scholars with Wikipedia to make it more useful to students and the public. Wilson argues that Wikipedia is a source that although warned from, students will go to anyway to start projects, look up terms, and go for general information. If Wikipedia is “the largest coherent store of information and ideas” as stated by Wilson, then “teacher and scholars should have been on this train years ago for the benefit of our students and professions.”…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in society, source credibility is becoming a bigger issue. Many people and students now a days find themselves in a predicament where credible sources are needed to help with research projects, essays, books etc. The internet is a big place and is filled with insane amounts of information for societies reach. The question is whether these sources are credible sources or just information filled in by average person with little experience or knowledge in the subject.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (1) I think that the Internet does not contain reliable information. (2) The Internet, a technological breakthrough in the twenty-first century, contains many invaluable, pixelated advertisements that are not necessary for the society. Although it is necessary to advertise in order to expand a business, there are many advertisements that do not belong on a certain page. (3) For example when I am focusing on finishing up a research, there are many pop-up advertisements that appear out of nowhere. I know most of the advertisements that appear on the computer screen are false (there could be a chance it could be non-existent) due to the fact that some people have the ability to scam. Also, there are unnecessary advertisements that do not belong in certain areas such as newspaper article sites. Some information that is located on sites, such as Wikipedia, has false information that is not found in other sources. (4) However, the internet does contain reliable information. (5) Reliable information is needed for the advancement of the society. Without reliable information, it is hard to prove anything (statement, declaration, etc.) wrong or right. (6) For example, reliable information that I look at is the reviews and ratings of the customers (if I am looking for a product) or the outcome based on previous scientific findings (if I am looking for information that is used for research). (7) Internet can be a reliable or non-reliable source that is based on the assumptions, preconceived notions, and the culture of the…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics