Preview

Why Whaling Should Be Banned Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
517 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Whaling Should Be Banned Research Paper
Why Whaling should be banned, by Annabel Lees

Imagine yourself as a Minke Whale being chased by a whaling vessel in the Antarctic Ocean. After half an hour, BAM! A harpoon hits you. Instantly you feel an agonizing pain in your side. You still fight for another hour until you feel weak, as if you cant move one more muscle in your body, you start to slow down and give up. Then the whalers shoot you with a shotgun, until you die.

Every year this happens to over 2,500 innocent, beautiful whales, I believe that this is wrong. People started to recognize that there were problems about whaling in 1925, that it was wrong, unnecessary and extremely cruel.

Whales are becoming extinct because of us. The number of these rare, beautiful animals is lowering at an extremely high rate. At the moment, 7 of the 13 ‘great whale’ species are currently classified as extinct. This is unacceptable and we, as humans, have to put a stop to it. Imagine if whales become extinct, how would this affect our life? We can live without them, right? Well, many things cant. Whales play an important role in stabilizing the aquatic food chain, and the reproduction of other animals living in the marine area. So if more
…show more content…
Recently I was in Japan and there was whale meat on many menus in the restaurants that I went to. Therefore I believe that countries such as Japan are not following the anti-whaling convention and have found a loophole to keep on hunting whales. This year, the International Court Of Justice, banned Japan's Antarctic whaling program. Some countries like Norway and Iceland have declined to sign the bill not to hunt whales as they state that it is within their rights to. Why should they not take notice of the world’s opinion on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Imagine being taken from your family at a very young age and held captive for the rest of your life. You are confined in a space about as big as your average bedroom and forced to eat, sleep, and play in there. Everyday you have to put on shows to entertain others with little to no rewards. You have no friends and family to relax with and no spouse to mate with. Who are you? You’re an average Killer Whale taken into captivity and forced to perform for others at Amusement Parks. Killer whales that are held in captivity have many negative impacts on their lives. When they are not in the wild their majestic dorsal fins can collapse, their death rate increases, and the chances of a trainer being hurt is escalated.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Friday, The California State Legislature approved a historic bill that banned the breeding of captive killer whales and orca performances in the state, the only exception would be for educational purposes and not entertainment, display, or performance purposes. The bill also prohibits the export or collect captive orcas coming from any place in California to another state or country, unless approved by federal law, and importing their semen or embryos of any orcas held in captivity for artificial insemination. The legislation passed 26-13 with Democrats in favor and Republicans opposing. The bill required that the killer whales be sent to sea sanctuaries for retirement in the United States or Canada. Sea World are actively lobbying against the bill, calling it unnecessary since they had already planned to do this and had announced…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whales are a highly intelligent aquatic species that are beneficial to the ecosystem. They are considered to be mammals because they feed their kids with milk, are warm-blooded animals, have seldom hair on their bodies, and they consciously inhale air into their lungs. They assist in the maintenance of the oceanic food chain by consuming millions of krill so they won’t take over the ocean. Each day a Blue Whale consumes about forty million krill, so I can’t even imagine how the lack of Blue Whales will affect other species. Even their stool have benefits for the environment. A Sperm Whale’s fecal matter provide nutrients to phytoplankton to help kindle their growth, which in return they eliminate carbon from the atmosphere. The removal of carbon…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blackfish Film Analysis

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Using killer whales as entertainment is unfair/inhumane, and not appropriate for others enjoyment because in the film, “Blackfish,” dates back to 1983, where a man is interviewed on capturing Tilikum, who showed emotion while telling his story. Tilikum was taken away from the wild, his mother, and family as a baby whale. As the men were trying to capture Tilikum, the mother and rest of the family were around the boat, calling for each other, and trying to help Tilikum to get away. It is such a sad thing to see or even think about, imagine someone just taking what doesn’t belong to them. The men showed no feelings or emotion on just taking the baby whale away and not even caring. “…killer whales that live in captivity more likely to suffer…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Acct Project 2

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Many social organizations tried to let people to stop whaling activities, such as World Wildlife Fund (WWF), International Whaling Commission (IWC), Greenpeace, etc. Those organizations are all nonprofit organizations which stated the importance of whale protection. In recent years, whaling forbidding has achieved a great success. Most of world traditional whaling countries signed to end their “commercial whaling activities” except three countries, those are: Japan, Iceland and Norway.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Seaworld Analysis

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They should understand they are not only causing harm to the whales but also to themselves. Since 1991 there has been registered more than 70 cases of orca whales in the state of captivity attacking their trainers, unlike in the wild 0 cases of aggressive orca’s towards humans. This is an extremely scary statistic considering that fifty percent of these cases were caused by the presence of an audience, and most of them leaded to death. This percentage is prove of how dangerous are the activities developed through performances. Accidents may happen once in awhile, but Seaworld was aware of the harm orca whales may cause in captivity. As soon as they purchased Tilikum, a whale who caused the closure of Sealand in Canada, when it killed his trainer, Keltie Byrne. As soon as Seaworld presented Tilikum in their shows without considering his aggressive background and forgetting their direct responsibility in front of the consequences and risks that this may bring to the trainers who interact with him. Don’t you think we had enough deaths…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whales in Captivty

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “ .. Animals they hold are better off in human care and perhaps even enjoy it.” ("WSPA") Yes, because they really enjoy dying. We’re pretty much killing them for our own entertainment. The Vancouver Aquarium Marine Science Centre says that they’re “helping whales and dolphins reproduce and are raising awareness for species survival”, when actually, having these mammals captive is the cause of their population decreasing. The aquarium is there for them when they’re sick, and they try to do the best of their ability to save them, but in some cases, they can’t. They can’t stop the whale from endless circling. They can’t perk their drooping dorsal fins. They can’t keep them from getting depressed. And they can’t stop the harmful things the whales are going to do to people.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whaling has been a Japanese tradition, which goes back to prehistoric times, so Japan has a strong historical connection with the sea as a source of food. But there are other countries that used to have such a connection to the sea as well, for example France and the US. Those countries ‘set sail’ to whaling or limited their whale hunts when the IWC put a ban on commercial whaling back in 1986. So Japan has no traditional reason to keep up the whale hunt. A country cannot, or may not keep up something like this just because it is a tradition.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I don't even think that the people care about the whales I mean you pull the animals right out of the ocean which is their home and rip them apart from their own family if that happened to me I would be pretty made. Whales in captivity have killed many people so I don’t even think it is safe to put them in captivity, they did not kill anyone in the ocean but now they are because they are in captivity. Whales are so friendly to us they have never done anything to hurt us but, we are hurting them, just…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While they are not an endangered species, they are hunted mercilessly by the fish industry especially off the coasts of China, Japan and parts of the North Pacific by the Russians (Ivashchenko 73). This extreme hunting has left the oceans with an unknown number of whales and thus, keeping them in facilities such as SeaWorld helps to replenish their numbers. However, since SeaWorld no longer catches or buys wild whales and instead breeds them for the very purpose of continuing the gene pool as Hardgrove describes in his book, it doesn’t help any animals still left in the wild. In fact, having such high numbers in captivity, while still allowing whaling practices to continue, we encourage whaling to go on. We can’t both praise whale captivity, and leave whales in nature to fend for themselves if we are really worried about…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Blackfish

    • 1198 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immoral and unfair to profit from the mistreatment of animals. The main attraction at many marine park continues to remain the killer whale, without them, attendance at shows would drop. The companies want to keep attendance and profit…

    • 1198 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes i agree with Ishmael that whaling is a honorable profession because it takes hard work a dedication for those men to do their jobs. At times they are gone for months to years on end braving the dangers of the sea and risking death from attacking the whales or from sharks that can smell the whales blood.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Japan’s excuse for whaling is that it is for “science purposes”. First of all, that excuse for whaling has been proven a lie. Scientists say that Japan’s whaling program is absolutely unscientific. According to International Student Volunteers, whaling is when whales are being harvested of meat, oil, and other products. Whale meat is not used as much as it was after World War 2. In an article from The Sydney Morning Herald called Deep fears drive Japanese whaling, it claims that, “Nor does Japan, a highly developed First World nation, have any need to supplement its supplies of protein with whale meat as it did in the dark days that followed the Second World War. Environmental groups such as Sea Shepherd point out that Japan now holds thousands of tonnes of whale in cold storage.” (Watson 1). This demonstrates that whale meat is not needed if it is just being put into storages. Therefore, whaling is not necessary. In an article from Treehugger called 18% of Grade Schools in Japan Feed Whale to Kids, it explains that nobody wants to buy the whale meat, so the solution was to sell it to schools in Japan. According to the text, it says, “While there's certainly a place for whales in grade schools -- it should be in the students' imagination, not their stomachs.” (Messenger 1). This quote demonstrates that there is no place for whale…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason why whaling should not be banned is that whaling is related with the culture, a historical background, and the religion. Facts about Japan.com website says that a Japanese people have kept on doing whaling since ancient times. A whale used to be used not only for meets, but also for the oil. Whale oil used to be used for light. Whales have been essential living things to earn people’s life. (“History of Japanese Whaling” fact about Japan, accessed in June 25th, 2011) Denying whaling also means denying the culture. Furthermore, from the point of Hindu’s view, it is a cruel threat that American people eat beef. There are the religious differences and different recognition. Sea Shepherd ignores other opinions, and it acts as it wants to do. They are so strong that Japanese government should protect whaling from such pushy organization.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The International Whaling Committee(ICW) is an IGO that was created in 1946 by the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. The IWC was created to ensure conservation of whale stocks and development of the whaling industry. The IWC presently has 40 members, with membership open to any state willing to sign on to the ICRW. The IWC meets annually; it has a small Secretariat and is lead by the Secretary-General. It is further divided into three committees: the Scientific, Technical, and Finance and Administration. Each state has one, equal vote. Decisions are made with a simple majority except for cases such as protected and unprotected species, open and closed waters and seasons, size limits for species, factors of whaling(time, methods, intensity), and types/specifications of gear to be used. Overall, the IWC is responsible for protecting endangered species, designating whale sanctuaries, setting whale kill quotas, specifying hunting seasons, maintaining whale stocks, conducting scientific research and regulating the capture of female whales with suckling calves. The IWC is an example of an organization created to avoid the tragedy of the commons. Despite efforts to conserve the whale stock, whale populations continue to decline. In 1982, the IWC issued a 15 year moratorium on all commercial whaling. States such as the former Soviet Union, Japan, Iceland and Norway opposed this, which went into effect in 1986. Because Norway formally objected the moratorium, and Japan was given an exemption to kill whales for science, these two states are not bound by the moratorium. This is because the ICRW allows objections from member states, IWC rules are not binding to those who object them. The IWC discussed two major issues at the 2001 meeting, the revised management scheme and additional whale sanctuaries. The new management scheme would lift the whaling ban and allow Japan and Norway whale-kill quotas. Whale sanctuaries are designated areas in which most…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays