Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Why was Trotsky's role in the civil war so important?

Good Essays
577 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why was Trotsky's role in the civil war so important?
In April 1918 when Trotsky was appointed commissar of war by the government it was a major turning point in the civil war. Whilst Lenin was working on the land that the Bolsheviks had and trying to ensure that it did not fall into the hands of the whites, Trotsky began to eradicate people who were against the Bolsheviks.
As a military commander he was able to do with the army what he wanted and despite being untrained, his philosophy and organisation meant that he excelled in the role. His philosophy was simple and strict - if a commander in the field failed; he paid the price, if a whole unit was at fault; they paid the price. This threat meant that the soldiers became well disciplined and as the white army certainly wasn’t, it gave the reds the advantage. Not only did Trotsky punish people, but if they were particularly courageous or showed initiative then they were quickly promoted and this acted as a motivator for the soldiers.
Most of Russia’s train lines were within the land that the reds occupied and that led to one of the most memorable things Trotsky did that involved him going around all the frontlines in an armoured train and visiting troops. Trotsky did this regularly which meant that he could never been seen as a fake military commander who stayed away from the fighting and because of this people looked up to him more and trusted him which consequently, meant they always followed his orders and the army therefore was always in unison and working together to defeat the whites. As a result of Trotsky always travelling around, it made communications easy so orders could be sent quickly through people such as Trotsky and this was important for the war as it meant the army could react quickly and always have the upper hand. Also, because much of Russia's industry and raw materials was located along the train lines it made it possible for the Bolsheviks to keep their troops supplied and equipped with weapons, ammunition and supplies throughout the war and this meant that they always had the best chances against the reds. Not only this but as commissar for war Trotsky was able to move troops and supplies rapidly to areas under attack and take personal command which meant decisions could be made quickly and the army could react quickly to any advances and ensure they held their ground. This happened many times as during times of crisis, Trotsky readily assumed personal command of areas under threat, inspiring and encouraging the troops to greater efforts, and to the eventual victory.
The fact that the reds were successful in the end proved that Trotsky’s harsh discipline worked and he was one of the main things that kept troops motivated and determines throughout the war which made them more likely to be able to win. The main reason he was so important during the civil war was because he was all about practical and not theory. Most other commanders focused on the theory and planning of everything, whereas Trotsky got on and just did things. This made him unique because he got things done and this meant his troops always reacted before the whites and had the upper hand and this was ultimately what won them the war. Therefore, in my opinion, Trotsky’s discipline and quick reactions was the reason for the Bolsheviks winning the war.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trotsky however was the complete opposite to Stalin. He was popular, an orator and a talented theorist who stirred loyalty in his troops. His radical ideas made him well-liked with the young and idealistic members of the communist party. Lenin in his testament identified Trotsky as a “the most able in the present communist committee” he also remarked on Trotsky’s “too far reaching self-confidence”…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born into a world of change due Russian Industrial revolution, Trotsky was shaped by his historical context and early life. The Revolution took place in the late 19th century. Industrialization was occurring at a fast rate with export of grains and coal increasing, however the working class was still repressed. Trotsky was introduced to a place where change was prevalent, yet nothing had been done for the proletariat. This impacted on his views that became apparent in later life. Trotsky was introduced to Communism in 1897. Being an inexperienced political activist, he was caught and exiled to Siberia. Trotsky was aware of leading Marxist Russians residing in London, including Martov and Lenin, and he escaped to join them. Arriving in 1902, Trotsky established a strong relationship with Lenin, who appreciated his literary abilities. Lenin checked Trotsky’s writing, especially articles for the Communist newspaper ‘Iskra’. However, in the Party Congress of 1903, the Social democratic party split into the Lenin led Bolsheviks and Martov headed Mensheviks. Trotsky stood against Lenin, stating that his theories went against Marxist notion of freeing the working classes. Through the context of his times, and early life experiences, it can be discerned that events…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent of a balanced interpretation of Trotsky within history varies throughout the differing aspects of his life and personality, however it can be considered that overall, it offers a balanced interpretation to a limited extent. His position as a Marxist offers a more unbalanced interpretation, as perspectives vary from stating that he was a practical Marxist idealist to perceiving him as a bloodthirsty terrorist. Similarly, interpretations of Trotsky appear unbalanced when considering his role as a propagandist through his oratorical skills and writing, which allowed for him to be viewed as a great Bolshevik figurehead, whilst Soviet Realism effectively eliminated his significance within history, and vilified him. Within his role as Commissar for War, however, offers a more balanced opinion as it is widely regarded both during his time and in more contemporary times that he was incredibly fit for the role, however there are still interpretations that vary from the romanticised notion of Trotsky as War Commissar. Therefore it can be considered that when considering different aspects of his life, the extent of a balanced interpretation varies, however that overall history offers a limited balanced interpretation of Trotsky, as within each segment of his life, there is no real mutual consensus, as differing contexts and agendas behind documenting history aim to colour Trotsky in different ways. Historiography allows for these differing opinions to be recognised as due to the different contexts and agendas behind historians for documenting Trotsky’s history, as history is a humanised process and thus flaws can be evident within the differing interpretations of Trotsky’s character.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The result, Trotsky told the tsar was ‘the general dissatisfaction of all classes with the government and tgeur open hostility towards it’. Trotsky’s depressing conclusion was that ‘it is impossible to maintain this form of government except by violence’.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Trotsky was the reason as to how the Bolsheviks gained so much power as he insisted on using ex-tsarist officers to train and control the red army. He used strict discipline in order to help the army and this greatly supported the Bolsheviks and helped them win the civil war. Trotsky also was the reason as to how the civil war was won, because not only did he recruit trained army officers- which was extremely difficult to do due considering most supported the whites- but also because he organized food and weaponry (8) and forced the red army to attack the Kronstadt sailors across melting ice, ruthlessly stooping the result and putting an end to the civil war. In other words, he won the civil war virtually single handed. This was one of the main reasons as to how the Bolsheviks consolidated their power and without the training of the army commanded by Trotsky, they wouldn’t have had the chance to be noticed. Furthermore, without Trotsky’s harsh commands and the declaration of “war is the instrument of policy” the civil war would’ve carried on, destroying the Bolshevik party and everything they had worked…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin was important to the Bolshevik seizure of power as he was able to manipulate public opinion using slogans and propaganda. This was also shown early in the year, before Lenin's return to Russia from Switzerland. The Bolsheviks in Russia had printed in 'Pravda' (their newspaper) that their members and followers should support the Provisional Government, and also that they had given serious thought to the idea of combining with the Mensheviks. This was all very contrary to what Lenin wrote in his 'April Theses' which clearly laid out his views and beliefs on the subject. A key point of his 'April Theses' was "No Support for the Provisional Government", yet without him his party were proposing just that. Lenin as an individual was able to force the Bolsheviks to follow his beliefs and goals and without him they may never have chosen this course of action at all. Through his April thesis, particularly the slogans “Peace, Bread, Land” and “All Power to the Soviets”, he was able to harness the support of the Russian people.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lenin Gain Power

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He outsmarted his rivals (Ex. Trotsky) in order to win the power clashes and take control of the Communist Party of the…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after Lenin’s rule there was a fight for power between Trotsky and Stalin. In the end, Stalin prevailed and earned leadership of the Soviet Union during the mid-1920s. However, once Stalin came to power, the lives of the society changed dramatically. Stalin’s wished to restore society which caused him to reverse Lenin’s previous work. Stalin revoked many laws concerning women’s emancipation because he wanted to strengthen tradition and build up the population.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is no question in my mind that the ideology of slavery, the fight for abolition, and the ensuing Civil War had the most profound effect on the America we know today. In order to answer how these areas affected life today, some background is important. The Civil War came about due to ideological differences regarding slavery between the north and the south that had been brewing since the founding of America. White southerners believed that slaves were property and their existence was necessary in order for whites to have freedom.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian railway network was also controlled by the Bolsheviks which proved to become key in winning the civil war. They used the railways to distribute munitions and transport soldiers to different fronts. What was so significant about this was the advantage of speed this gave to the Red Army. If…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be noted that each of his opponents, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Rykov and Bukharin each had their flaws in the struggle for power – some of them being prominent in their bid for power within the party. Trotsky was Stalin’s main opponent and always seemed to be a favourite of Lenin’s which would seems obvious why Stalin would have such a vendetta against him, not to mention that Stalin was denounced by Trotksy during the October Revolution which Lenin and Trotsky had planned together – and so viewed as one of the more heroic contenders within the party. Trotsky was a gifted theorist and excelled as the commentator, critic, and executor of policies and was noted to be an enthusiastic and influential orator – often inspiring the loyalty of his…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allegory Used By Authors

    • 1155 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution has two parts to it: the February Revolution and the October Revolution; that centers around 1917-1918. The February one resulted in the overthrow of Tsar Nicholas II’s abusive power. After that, Lenin and the Bolsheviks took control. Leon Trotsky was the leader of the 1917 Russian Revolution that took care of foreign affairs under Lenin. He was exiled from the Soviet Union after losing a power struggle with Stalin over who was to become Lenin’s successor. The October Revolution was planned to get rid of the provisional government. Led by the Bolsheviks, an extremist group, they established the Soviet Union. In the year of 1918, these people abandoned the democratic process and formally declared themselves the dictators of the proletariat.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Depression and Fascism

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Lenin had support of the Russian peasants, who made up a large portion of the Russian population. In March 1918, he signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, ending Russia's involvement in World War I and surrendering much of Russia's resources. The Civil War ruined Russia's economy. During the War, Lenin initiated War Communism. The state seized most factories, all surplus food was taken to the government, and there was no buying, selling, or trading. During this time, a huge percentage of Russians dies (about 33%). Many of them being farmers and laborers.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact, Trotski is quoted saying “We have not organised the revolution to kill”(Spartacus). However, there were too many groups trying to destroy the Bolsheviks. This forced Vladimir Lenin to create the “Extraordinary Commission for the Suppression of the Counter-Revolution” also known as the Cheka; A secret police force. While the creation of this group was Lenin’s idea, Trotsky was put in charge, and repeatedly eliminated numerous enemies of the revolution. This was Trotsky’s first step in winning the civil war. When the “Whites” attacked the Bolsheviks and started the Civil War, Lenin appointed Trotsky as the Commissar for War, and President of the Supreme War Council. Thus, Trotsky single handedly was responsible for the Bolsheviks victory in the Civil War after defeating all enemy threats with terror and fulfilling the head leadership roles he was appointed to. Trotsky was extremely valuable to the Bolsheviks due to the fact that without him, they would have lost the Civil War. Without Trotsky, there would have been no one suitable to fill his numerous positions in which he had to make hard decisions that conflicted with his personal morals and mastermind many of the Bolsheviks victories. In addition, the vicious, blunt leader rebuilt the Russian army with the help of the Red Guards and through a recruiting and training process which proved difficult due to the fact that most officers supported the “Whites”. Trotsky was single handedly responsible for increasing the amount of soldiers from 7,000 in March 1918 to 5 million in Sep 1920(Brown, 1990). Without the essential rassemblement of this army, Trotsky would have not had the fire power to order Red Guards to ruthlessly put down the revolt of the Kronstadt sailors in March of…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays