Preview

Why Was The Term Tudor Revolution In Government?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was The Term Tudor Revolution In Government?
The term ‘Tudor revolution in government’ was coined by Sir Geoffrey Elton in 1953, and describes the belief that administrative reform in Tudor England in the 1530s was so momentous, that it amounted to revolutionary reforms. Elton claimed that, during the Henrician era, government evolved from that of a medieval one, to a bureaucratic modern one and that the main motivation behind this was national sovereignty. In Elton’s proposal of this concept, he placed prominence on Thomas Cromwell’s role, stating it was he who personally pioneered this revolution through three main ways: the emergence of the Privy Council, his innovations of royal finance and the development of royal supremacy; John Guy challenges this, claiming that it was Wolsey’s conciliar plans that anticipated later developments; Cromwell inherited these.
The replacement of the King’s chamber with the Privy Council was a revolutionary change. There was a reduction to 19 members - all of which had to work within the government prior to holding a position in the council. Therefore, in theory, it excluded a majority of the nobility who wished to serve their own interests. Elton believes that the creation of the
…show more content…
A major cause of the reorganisation of Tudor finance was the dissolution of the monasteries and the subsequent need to survey, evaluate their worth, document and redistribute their estates. It made necessary the creation of the Court of Augmentations, and other offices that dealt with administration, an expanded bureaucracy and new methods. Over the following decade, the crown’s average income trebled. A greater level of bureaucratic and diplomatic activity, higher attention to preserving the record of judicial processes and new taxation assessments also fed this expansion of government. By 1558, all financial departments had bureaucratic elements; thus revolution in finance is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HOW FAR WAS HENRY VII’S CONTROL OF THE NOBILITY 1485 TO 1509 DUE TO HIS FINANCIAL POLICIES? (24 marks)…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Cecil’s influence touched on just about all aspects of policy that occurred during Elizabeth’s long reign. In the Royal Court he brought order and stability. Cecil was also highly influential in foreign policy. He saw France and Spain as threats to. It has also been argued that Cecil was not just the provider of advice and executor of the Queens wishes but also that he could have been the power behind the throne. Plenty of evidence has come to light that suggests that the Secretary regularly attempted to manipulate Elizabeth however it would be inaccurate to assume that all of Cecil’s personal agendas were fruitful, Elizabeth could make her own mind up and often did so. Although Cecil was a prominent figure during this time, Elizabeth was still the person who ruled the country and had her own ideas on how to run the country. Elizabeth was firmly in control of major policies and on many occasions obstinately ignored the Councils advice. The Council conscientiously carried out the Queens wishes even when it had advised otherwise. There is general agreement that, until its decline in the 1590s central government under Elizabeth was successful and that the Queen provided firm direction. According to Neale Parliament was another aspect that had influence over decision making in Elizabeth government He argues that the power of the House of Commons increased throughout Elizabeth’s reign. The number of conflicts Elizabeth had with individual MPs and the problems which the Stuarts experienced with Parliament are evidence for this. These developments were brought by the “Puritan Choir “who deliberately planned confrontations to force the issue of parliamentary privilege versus the royal prerogative. It is therefore necessary to investigate not only to what extent Cecil was involved in the decision making process but also the influence of the Parliament on Elizabeth and ultimately the decisions that were taken through this time of how many were Elizabeth’s own ideas.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The short yet significant reign of Edward bought with it a series of severe changes to England and all those within it, many of them taking a religious nature. As the once unquestionable authority of the church became challenged by both critics and affiliates alike, England witnessed an almost inevitable reformation. However, the impact on the majority was not necessarily beneficial- as Duffy wrote, the Reformation bought with it an ‘assault on traditional religion’, leaving many men that ‘breathed easier for the accession of a Catholic queen’.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the context of the years 1485 to 1603 to what extent was the government of England dysfunctional in the mid-Tudor period?…

    • 3558 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the history of time, there have been many leaders of the world’s different civilizations. While each leader may have possessed different qualities: some strong, others weak; some righteous, others corrupt…each rule played an important part in shaping the culture of that civilization. Though not every civilization was governed by a leader that had a worldly impact, the rule of England under King Henry VIII, was one of great historical importance. Unlike many leaders of his time, Henry’s legacy was not forged under the motivation of power and greed, but by love and his desire to have a male heir. Henry VIII became the King of England in 1509 after the death of his father Henry VII. Like most kings Henry desired to have a male heir,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    During this essay the questions that will be discussed will be ‘Was this a new monarchy? and ‘Was Henry VII and innovator? But as said before, his biggest problem was money.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the devastating fall of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, to the rise of his successor, the relentless Thomas Cromwell. Cromwell, throughout the course of English history has continually been portrayed as the main villain during Henry VIII’s reign, aside from Henry himself of course. A man, who thought nothing of betraying friends or allies in his conquest to secure the most notorious career in history. Since Henry VIII sent his chief minister and close advisor to the scaffold five centuries ago on 28 July 1540, historians have debated on the characterisation of Cromwell. Was he a manipulative death merchant who, throughout his political career killed and victimised thousands of innocent people for obeying their religious beliefs. Or was Cromwell simply a man of modest decent, risen from the ashes of his poor upbringing, due to his impeccable intelligence and determination?…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have debated the powers of the king and parliament for centuries, and the events that molded the power balance between the two institutions. This power balance had been changed to a large extent by the end of the seventeenth century from what it had been at the beginning; as power and control slipped out of the monarchy’s grasp and into parliament’s hands. For could James the 1st have ever imagined that in a few years time his son would be beheaded on the charge of treason, and the monarchy itself would be abolished? Could William the 3rd have contemplated having the power to command a standing army, and conducting a foreign policy independent of Parliament? No one can deny the political changes of this era, however, what can be argued is what form this change took; an evolution or a revolution?…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He utilizes examples from the Assyrian empire and explains what makes a government fair and just. Historically, the Glorious Revolution has routes stemming from the Reformation of the Catholic Church. Following Henry VIII, England was primarily a protestant nation, as Henry VIII had an inclination to pick a new wife due to his lack of ability to make a successor. The Catholic Church wouldn’t allow for a divorce. So, Henry VIII and England left the Catholic religion to start their own.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonists need to obtain independence immediately to break away from England and overcome the dictatorship of its monarchal government! “A government of our own is our natural right: Ye that oppose independence now, ye know not what ye do; ye are opening a door to eternal tyranny, by keeping vacant the seat of government.” The internal invasion of England is depriving three million people of their rights, liberties, and pursuit of happiness. An invasion occurs not just through violent insurgencies, but through the tolerances of human injustice, degradation of humanity, and abuse of power by England’s own citizens who conceal themselves behind a monarchal government. These subtle approaches to invade a country are more powerful because the acts are…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clash between the two political models of absolutism and constitutionalism is the catalyst for the progression in English politics. With William and Mary as their rulers, the Parliament didn’t need to worry about a Catholic ruler and even better they were able to get their rulers to recognize the Bill of Rights of 1689. Finally able to limit the power of the monarch, making the ruler subject to the law and the consent of Parliament, the theory of a constitutional monarchy was put into action through this bill. This is the beginning of England’s, later Great Britain, rise to being a world power and setting an example that others will soon…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glorious Revolution Causes

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This paper defines the term ‘Glorious Revolution’. It is regarded as the revolt of compromise or mutual consent. It portrays how the entire country England makes a dramatic change in her ruling system. By abolishing tyrannical system, the country establishes democratic rule without any bloody battle. It also gives us some idea about the situation that was prevailed before the revolution, the reasons that led this revolution happen along with its significance. It will also talk about different laws and acts that were imposed in the country after the revolution. It basically aims at to familiarize the event that occurred in 1688 in England.…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolution In The 1700s

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The revolution was very different but also very similar for different types of people in the 1700s. When comparing the meaning of revolution for men, woman, slaves, and Native Americans you have to consider that they all were fighting for the same reason, freedom. The meaning of freedom is very different for each class or groups of these people but they all ultimately had the same goal of gaining their freedom. When considering the consequences of the revolution, It’s important to consider how it effect each group of individuals and understand the diversity during this time. Without the diversity we saw in the 1700s I strongly believe the revolution would not have had the same impact on today’s society that it did.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments were relatively successful in dealing with the problem of rebellion, although this was more effective towards the end of the period than at the beginning shown through the decline in rebellion after 1549: only 5 English rebellions occurred as opposed to 10 before 1549. Over the course of the Tudor period the main aims of rebellions were only fully achieved in the rebellions of 1525, the Amicable Grant and 1553. In addition to this the reforms made to local government, policies directly implemented by central government and the effects of trials and retribution, such as Henry VII’s concessions made to the late 15th century pretenders, Lambert Simnell and Perkin Warbeck and later in the period during Elizabeth’s reign, who recognised rebel Shane O’Neil as Earl of Tyrone, all contributed to the reduction in the frequency and scale of English rebellions. Pre-emptive strikes implemented by Tudor governments were also instrumental, especially during the start of the period in Henry’s reign and later in Elizabeth’s reign, in preventing rebellion or stopping riots from becoming dangerous rebellions. In some areas these strategies and tactics worked better in some areas than others; Irish rebellions were generally more costly and more difficult to suppress.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays