Preview

Why Was The German Unification Movement Successful

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was The German Unification Movement Successful
Essay question: Trace the unification movement within the German confederation up until 1834. What were the main obstacles to overcome?

German unification, from 1815-1834 faced many obstacles, obstacles that would have to be overcome if the unification movement within Germany were to be successful. From the very beginning there were many forces acting against the unification movement, states like Austria were very much against the unification. The people in Austria were reactionaries; they believed that they had a better quality of life in the pre-Napoleonic times. Other forces that acted against the unification movement were the congress of Vienna, a collection of the 39 biggest and most influential states in Germany, (with Austria as the most important and influential component.) And finally the Carlsbad decrees, a set of reactionary restrictions put in place by the German confederation to prevent ‘liberal’ thinking.

Prince Metternich was the chancellor of Austria; he was the most influential man during the time of the German unification. Prince Metternich was the chancellor of Austria between 1807 and 1848, during his time as chancellor of Austria, he tried in many
…show more content…
The main two states in the German confederation were Austria and Prussia, but Austria and Metternich still held the upper hand. Prince Mettenich was put at the head of the German confederation. Under his direction the education system was strictly controlled, newspapers and pamphlets were censored by the government, they did this because they did not like the idea’s of liberalism and nationalism spreading. Through Austria’s control of the German confederation, Metternich was able to convince the other states and principalities to apply the same policies to their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Germany, during the two decades of the first major railroads being built, was separated into three-dozen individual states. The railroads provided an opportunity for those states to merge into a united country. This was accomplished through a unified trading system, linking the industrial cities, uniting Western and Eastern Prussia, delivering a more effective structure to law and order and competition between states and private companies.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Metternich was the chancellor of Austria and therefore had a substantial amount of power, this enabled him to make radical decisions regarding Germany, whether it included unifying it or not.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Dbq

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Designed specifically to made unification pratically impossible, and encouraging 'independance of the individual states',there was also even a reluctance to stick to what had been agreed on in teh articles of the confederation for example a federal army. However, the set up of the German confed did signify the start of Metternichs suppressive system, where movements such as The Burshcenshaften students union,1815 and The Wartburg festival 1817,both of which spread liberal and national ideas were deemed to be unacceptable hence the introduction of The Carlsbad decrees 1819,ltd freedom of the press and checking upon lectures in unversities. This was merely the beginning of the period which later became known as the quietr years a time which was extremelyh unconductive and unproductive to…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution consisted of 25 federal states, within this there were 4 kingdoms, 12 Duchies, 6 Grand Duchies and 3 free cities. At first the Kaiser had pretty much entire control over all of these states however at this point the Kaiser had great control over each of these states, however each one did have a government which could decide healthcare system, education and justice policies. The states were at this point happy with this situation so on the whole they were content to remain part of Germany.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Emperor Fredrick Wilhelm had to give up portions of Prussia’a territory, yet, due to the pressure by the other great powers. Still it had the chance of rebuilding and unifying much quicker than with a large and divided…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bizmarck

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Certain motivating political and economic factors enabled Germany to gain its unification in the late nineteenth century. Its economic prosperity from the zollverein, technological advances, and political moves in terms of actions allowed it to ultimately acquire a solid unification by 1871.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Purbeck School Humanities. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from http://purbeckhumanities.co.uk/2010/11/17/german.unification-timeline/ Website “German Unification” (2013). Wikipedia. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unification_of_Germany Work Cited (Work Sheet Work Cited)…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This meeting would become to be known as the Congress of Vienna. The Congress of Vienna was the first events of international meetings that came to be known as the “Concert of Europe” intent to kept a peaceful balance of power in Europe. The congress of Vienna was held by the 4 European powers called “Quadruple Alliance” that defeated Napoleon: Austria, Prussia, Russia, and the United Kingdom. At the congress, Metternich’s master of diplomatic skill earned him the title of “the coachmen of Europe.” The goal of the conservatives at this meeting, led by the Austrian Prince, Klemens von Metternich.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The revolutions of 1848-9 impacted Austria’s previously dominant political power significantly. With the Austrian chancellor Metternich fleeing from power in March 1848 and revolutions resulting in chaos that threatened the extinction of any future Austrian influence, the crippling state’s main focus was to supress anything that could jeopardize its weakened power even further, rather than establishing any plans to increase dominance. However certain events such as the failure of the Erfurt union, the humiliation at Hesse-Cassel and the meeting at Olmutz tightened Austria’s grasp by an almost transfer of power from Prussia to Austria and enabled it to begin a process of re-establishing previously existing influence and attempt to supress any Prussian political advantages. Eventually Austria’s newly found power would be put to the test as it started to draw up future plans for an even greater Austrian hold than had previously existed prior the upheavals. These plans, such as a ‘zollunion’ and the establishment of alternative custom unions can truly reveal the extent of Austria’s influential survival.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He realized the political and geographical chaos within Germany after the Congress of Vienna in 1814-1815. This was greatly due to the high number of local battles and internal wars within the un-unified Germany. The existence of these struggles was mainly because, through the congress’s “balance of power”, European powers were limited to reduce the possibility of the uprising of continental strength which might oppose a threat to Europe. Bismarck, being and opportunistic politician did not like the situation of anarchy and took in hand the responsibility to unify Germany, and by mass election of the people he up rose in between the mid 19th century. This characteristic trait and behaviour made him an untrustworthy figure in the eyes of his political allies, why? Simply, they worried that such an opportunistic symbol such as Bismarck would un-doubtfully take advantage of a vulnerable situation, like he did in Germany, and introduce a setback, which in turn may misdirect Germany threat to neighbouring areas, leading to continental feud, thus damaging local trade through mercantilism, political alliances such as that between Austria and Prussia, and future democratic recessions such as those in the north German Confederation of the year 1876. Otto Von Bismarck was now the Machiavellian politician who kept the European powers on high alert through the process of signing treaties and…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austria was the largest and most influential kingdom in the German Confederation which meant the lack of power for Germany. In 1849, the liberal constitution that was demanded was finally set in place and Frederick William of Prussia was elected to rule lesser Germany. Frederick would be offered a crown whereas he would accept a constitution that would object to the rights of the German states, therefore, leading Frederick to refuse the offer. Frederick wanted to rule under his own terms, but Austria refused. As a result, the German Confederation was re-established and Prussia denied all plans of unification. After the German confederation was re-established security was enforced upon many of the universities, organizations, and the press. Revolutionaries later on fled into exile and the matter of unification was rejected. The attempt to unite Germany with Prussia had completely…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Frankfurt Assembly came as a result of the political unrest in Prussia and the German states during 1848. Both liberals and radicals were dissatisfied with the lack of freedom that the government offered them. The assembly in Frankfurt was a gathering of elected representatives from Prussia, Austria, and all the Germanic states to discuss the creation of a unified Germany. Most of the delegates were lawyers, professors, or administrators, and most were also moderate liberals. At the assembly, questions about nationality generated a lot of contention. Which Germans would be in the new state? Many delegates argued that all Germans were bound to unification by their language, culture, and geography. They believed that the German nation should include as many Germans as possible. On the other hand, there was a minority who wanted a "Small Germany" that left out all lands of the Habsburg Empire, like German Austria. After a long debate, the assembly went with the Small German solution and offered the crown of the new nation to Frederick William IV. Fredrick William IV was responsible for the start of the down fall of the Frankfurt assembly however he wasn’t completely to blame as the disorganisation of the parliament and the fact that it had no real power to do anything as it lacked a loyal army.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both, Metternich and Bismarck sought to bring unity and stability to their nations, but in different ways. While Metternich was hard at work using his diplomatic skills trying to prevent German unification during the first half of the nineteenth century, Bismarck on the other hand was known as the Iron Chancellor, in the later nineteenth century set on to unite Germany through his many wars.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays