Preview

Why Was Reconstruction a Failure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Reconstruction a Failure
Why was Reconstruction a failure?

The Reconstruction of the South was a period where the government decided they needed to solve economic and political problems that had become over the years. I think the Reconstruction Era was a failure for many reasons. The Era had a goal of allowing freedom and equality for all, abolishing slavery, and restoration of the Union and I don't feel as though any of those were accomplished. President Lincoln issued a proclamation in 1863 showing his plan, where readmittance of all Southern states would take place after 10% of its voting population had proved its loyalty to the Union. Lincoln was then assassinated and Johnson took on the plan as new president, but Congress called for stricter measurements. The proclamation was supposed to be put in place to secure rights for former slaves, and equality, although that issue still seems to be an issue in America today. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendment were all passed in effort to abolish slavery, and make African-Americans feel as though they were equal to whites. There was such a push by certain groups to abolish slavery, but slaveowners and southerner a found many ways around the new rules. Things such as literacy tests, and poll taxes were there to make sure things still weren't equal for African-Americans, although laws were trying to force it. Slaves weren't educated, nor payed nearly close enough to what they needed to live off of, therefor it was impossible for them to pass literacy tests, and pay the poll taxes which meant they weren't able to place their vote, and they were still set back by their race. The republicans believed that for restoration of the Union to take place, that they'd have to make sure the South wasn't going to secede once again. Along with knowing the Southern states were not going to secede, they demanded an oath of loyalty from 50% of each states voting population. The restoration of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Abraham Lincoln issued the Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction as the Reconstruction plan in 1863, two years before the end of civil war. Lincoln proposed the Ten-Percent Plan with a provision requiring the ex-confederate states to rewrite their constitution stating their allegiance to the United States. Those states can be admitted back if ten percent of its eligible voters pledged their loyalty to the Union. Included in Lincoln’s program was the Freedmen's Bureau. This program was a federal government agency organized to help the freed slaves and should operate for at least a year. The Bureau encouraged former plantation owners to rebuild their plantations. To the freed blacks, the agency helped them get jobs, and they were given food supplies and land. Included also in this program was the supervision in equality in labor and management so that blacks may be treated fairly.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the end of the Civil War the south deeply was in need of reconstruction. Before the war even ended, President Lincoln has already started to plan for reconstruction. His plan offered general amnesty to white southerners that would accept the abolition of slavery and pledge an oath of loyalty to the government. Suffrage was also granted to African Americans who were educated, owned property, or had served in the Union Army. For the southern states to readmit to the Union, they had to have 10 percent of the state’s total voters to take the oath of loyalty. Lincoln knew that his plan would be difficult to follow through with because of the Radical Republicans. The Radicals did not like the mildness of his plan. They wanted a stricter plan call the Wade-Davis Bill. In this Bill a governor was appointed to each…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern states could reenter the union after 50% of their voters pledge allegiance to the U.S. before all of it began a bill has been stipulated. Lincoln’s vision for reconstruction seemed to favor self-construction by the states with little assistance. The radical republicans in congress feared that Lincoln’s plan was not harsh enough to the south and need to be punished for the war. Lincoln was too…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The period of Reconstruction after the Civil War cannot be classified as either a success or a failure because there are many conflicting outcomes and differing opinions regarding this era. During this time, the United States was once again united but the government also failed to ensure and protect the rights of former slaves from white persecution. The South reverted to its old ways of discrimination when President Hayes removed Union troops in 1877. Reconstruction was a success in the sense that it restored the U.S. to a united country after the Civil War but at the same time a failure due to the collapse of the Radical Republican Party, the lack of acceptance of former slaves by whites and their unwillingness to give African Americans the rights they deserved.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are similarities and differences between the Wartime, Presidential, and Congressional Reconstruction. Each had a purpose and plan. There was a major difference between the Republican President and Republican Congress that caused many conflicts.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The efforts of Reconstruction was in lack of better terms a failure. Both political parties only grew more despise towards each other, which lead to constant conflict. Many Radical Republican saw that the last straw was the Compromise of 1877, after trying to fix the south with equality it was stunted by handing control back white surprise. Which believed in the ways it was in the south with before slavery. The lack of corroboration between the two lead to the title that Reconstruction was a failure.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    RECONSTRUCTION, WHAT WENT WRONG I. Historiography of Reconstruction A. Early Views Journalists, Poets, & Rebels Negative view of Reconstruction Sidney Andrews, The South Since the War (1866) John Dennett, The South as It Is. Southern frame of reference Sidney Lanier (poet) Attempt to justify Civil War B. Early Professional Historians John Ford Rhodes Ohio Democrat Not impartial Blamed North for problems of Reconstruction’ Claimed Black Rule forced on South at point of bayonet John William Burgess Tennessee Unionist Former Union soldier Studied at University of Berlin Organized History Graduate Program at Columbia University Produced historians such as U.B. Phillips and William Archibald Dunning Traditionalist view of Reconstruction Burgess, Phillips & Dunning Basic view: Stressed Southern problems Minimized achievements of Freedmen Regarded White Supremacy as normal in South C. Dunning School And Traditionalism William Archibald Dunning Taught at Columbia University Attracted best historical minds of his day Wrote histories of their own states James W. Garner, Reconstruction in Mississippi (1901)…

    • 2820 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the four articles portrayed a different explanation for why Reconstruction did not work out as planned by the United States Government. Thomas W. Wilson’s article reveals that the government preyed upon the South. Carter Woodson asserts that former slaves were not given a fair chance to make Reconstruction work, while Thomas Bailey blames the Radicals for pushing it on clueless, former slaves. Finally, Mary Beth Norton takes issue with the resistance of Reconstruction that the South held from the beginning. While each tells a varied story of their interpretation of why it failed, all agree that indeed, Reconstruction failed. Thus, former slaves were not given a fair chance to reconstruct their lives and the Southern states could…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reconstruction in the United States is historically known as the time in America, shortly after the Civil War, in which the United States attempted to readdress the inequalities, especially of slavery and many other economic, social and politically issues including the poor relationship between the North and the South of America. These problems were highly significant in America, and a variety of groups in government tried to resolve these problems, but this only led to the Civil War. Unfortunately although there were numerous new constitutions and laws introduced to tackle these issues, it could be said that reconstruction did indeed fail, and there was a variety of reasons that many historians touch upon to why reconstruction did not fulfil its purpose.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reconstruction was the period during which the United States began to rebuild after the Civil War, lasting from 1865 to 1877. It was to repair the North and the South politically, economically and socially. After the Civil War, the South’s economy was completely ruined and needed help from the Union government; which they were trying to stay way from. The Reconstruction can be evaluated both as a success and a failure. Its successes were the restoration of the eleven confederate states back to the union, giving African-Americans (ex-slaves) their freedom and rights and providing aid to the freed slaves and poor whites. Its failures were the Anti-African Americans groups such as the KKK, the Black Codes, not protecting the rights of the freedmen and the southern corruption. Although African-Americans were freed and gained their rights because of 13th, 14th and 15th amendments, and the ex-eleven confederate states came back to the union, the Reconstruction was more of a failure than a success.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Civil war took place due to slavery and preventing African Americans from withdrawing from the United states. After the ending of the Civil War of 1865-1877, Reconstruction took place. The reconstruction began after the North had won its victory against the South. It was a process of readmitting Southern states into the southern union. During this period there was a controversy because of Abraham Lincoln's assassination however, Johnson replaced his position as president.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reconstructions goals were merely achieved, After the Reconstruction ended African Americans everything stayed the same, they had more rights when the Civil War was in place everything remained the same there was no exact change. The amount of hope that was pouring in the blacks was bringing many hopes up but ended in total devastation. The Reconstruction was the event which led to lives changing constantly it had its success and its failures Its turning point in America when life was restarted. African Americans lost many rights like the right to vote, having health care, the right ot get a proper education and many more rights where taken away. Soon after the Reconstitution the republicans interest in supporting the right blacks, then the democrats got full control of the south leading to capitalism rising again. The Reconstruction transformed African Americans for a short time. More than 2 centuries African Americans were given new lives. Although it was not like equality it was more of a labor of destroying life. But this small change was a huge improvement from being incarcerated all their life time. The most important thing that The Reconstruction succeeded was it freed slaves in the south replacing it with…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What would have happened if Abraham Lincoln hadn’t been assassinated? This is a question that I have asked myself since the first time I had learned about this time in American history. It is this very question that the author of the article addresses. The initial view towards Reconstruction was that it wouldn’t have made a difference whether or not Lincoln had been part of the picture, many historians had believed that Lincoln would have clashed with Radical Republicans in congress much like Andrew Johnson had.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reconstruction era was during the years 1865 through 1677. It was directly after the civil war and was focused on reinstating southern states into the Union. While many southerners wanted to rejoin the Union, many were opposed to the changes that came with it which included equality for blacks. Although, some social policies that were passed did help to advance through the reconstruction era successfully, there were many downfalls that came along with it, including social and economic failures.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 22 Apush Key Terms

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Was a bill proposed for the Reconstruction of the South written by two Radical Republicans, Senator Benjamin Wade of Ohio and Representative Henry Winter Davis of Maryland. In contrast to President Abraham Lincoln's more lenient Ten Percent Plan, the bill made re-admittance to the Union for former Confederate states contingent on a majority in each Southern state to take the Ironclad oath to the effect they had never in the past supported the Confederacy.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays