Preview

Why Was King Leopold Able To Colonize Congo

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was King Leopold Able To Colonize Congo
Journalists play an important role in our history because they give us a view of our world and help us make connections to everyone. They would have to go extreme measures if needed to find more information because they want their story to be the highly accurate and the best one out there. In order for the people to understand what was going on in daily news, they would read what the journalists wrote. King Leopold II was able to colonize Congo with the help of the journalists and writers keeping quiet about what was really happening in Congo. King Leopold II was an ambitious man who only cared about the money and power. He was focused on buying land and in the 1870s, Africa was the best place to start a colony. To do all of this, Leopold pretended to like a humanitarian and philanthropist by holding international conferences. He pretended to help the Africans by wanting to abolish slave trade as part of his secretive plan to illegally take over African land. In reality, he would end …show more content…
Men, women and even the children were chained by the next while doing their work. They were extremely malnourished, had lack of sleep and were being mistreated and it led to many of their deaths. Leopold was all about making money so he would make them produce large amounts of products at a time. If they were not cooperating or following the quota, their punishments included being lashed by a corkscrew whip twenty-five to one hundred times. To others it looked like Leopold kept emphasizing the ban on slave trade but some witnesses wanted to say that he was a hypocrite. He called his own slaves volunteers, but they were in chains. Leopold’s army would hold women, children and chiefs as hostages until the men met the quota of the amount of rubber. This clearly shows that King Leopold was lying to everyone that he wanted to ban slave trade and he would have the media cover up the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adam Hochschild's "King Leopold's Ghost" is a lost historical account starting in the late 19th century continuing into the 20th century of the enslavement of an entire country. The book tells the story of King Leopold and his selfish attempt to essentially make Belgium bigger starting with the Congo. This was all done under an elaborate "philanthropic" public relations curtain deceiving many countries along with the United States (the first to sign on in Leopold's claim of the Congo). There were many characters in the book ones that aided in the enslavement of the Congo and others that help bring light to the situation but the most important ones I thought were: King Leopold, a cold calculating, selfish leader, as a child he was crazy about geography and as an adult wasn't satisfied with his small kingdom of Belgium setting his sites on the Congo to expand. Hochschild compares Leopold to a director in a play he even says how brilliant he is in orchestrating the capture of the Congo. Another important character is King Leopold's, as Hochschild puts it, "Stagehand" Henry Morton Stanley. He was a surprisingly cruel person killing many natives of the Congo in his sophomore voyage through the interior of Africa (The first was to find Livingston). Leopold used Stanley to discuss treaties with African leaders granting Leopold control over the Congo. Some of the natives he talked to weren't even in the position to sign the treaties or they didn't know what they were signing. And probably the most influential person in the book, E.D. Morel. Morel, an employee of a Belgian company that handled shipments to the Congo, noticed that the shipments coming to and from the Congo seemed really suspicious.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the Congress of Berlin in 1885, the Congo Basin was united as the Congo Free State. From the Belgian parliament, Leopold was granted almost absolute control of the area. Under terms of the General Act of the Berlin Conference, Leopold pledged to guarantee free trade within the colony, suppress the East African slave trade, promote humanitarian policies, impose no import taxes for twenty years, and encourage philanthropic and scientific enterprises. Conflicting with his oath, Leopold issued a series of decrees beginning in the mid-1880's that violated these conditions. First, he decreed that Belgium assert rights of proprietorship over all vacant land in the Congo. In three successive decrees, the already few rights of the Congolese were reduced even further. They were only able to lay claim on their native villages and farms. Second, Leopold ordered that merchants limit their commercial operations in the Congo to no more that bartering with natives. By 1890, faced with considerable financial difficulty, Leopold had already directly violated his promises; the Congo basically became a commercial entity and it was found that Leopold had been slowly monopolizing a large amount of the ivory and rubber trade by imposing import and export taxes.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A little more than a quarter of a century ago, a great genius for evil, having achieved in rapid succession a series of diplomatic master strokes, stretched out to reach the scepter which was to give him power over life and death of over 20 million human beings.” This great genius for evil, King Leopold II, was commonly known for the atrocities he committed in the Congo Free State. Leopold’s ability to gain control over the lives of the Congolese was due to the deceit and use of persuasion over head powers for a lucrative business. Specifically, in the Congo Free State, King Leopold II’s approach to governing, in an effort to gain the most profit, lead to violent atrocities and the deaths of many natives.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Leopold II of Belgium was a manipulative ruler who created injustices in the Congo Free State. Many missionaries and young idealists traveled to Africa for adventure but unexpectedly found themselves amidst a holocaust. Despite the many African rebel leaders’ attempts to stop King Leopold, over ten million Congolese people were killed.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    d) Leopold promised to suppress the East African slave trade, promote humanitarian policies, guarantee free trade, and encourage missions. However, Leopold prohibited trade in arms, authorized the terms for the employment of native workers, committing them agree for terms of seven years to their employers, and established the Force Publique.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism in Indochina and the Congo Throughout the 1890’s – 1910’s the imperialists ideas remained similar around the globe. Many European countries such as the Netherlands, France, Germany, and the United States proposed similar ideals regarding the importance of imperialism through acquiring of raw materials and territory. Specifically, regarding the conquests of and King Leopold II of Belgium, and Napoleon III it is evident that the root cause of European imperialists was to discover foreign territory in hopes to find raw materials that could potentially reap economic benefits. After taking the throne in 1865, King Leopold’s motives were centered around annexing Congolese territory to profit from the ivory enterprise.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ,geographers at the royal palace in Brussels (1876). Several years later he hired Henry Morton Stanley to be his right-hand man in Africa. For half a decade, Stanley traveled the Congo setting up posts, building roads, and persuading chiefs─practically all being illiterate─to sign treaties with Leopold. The treaties, some of which doctored to Leopold’s benefit, were then put to use by the Belgian monarch (Britannica). Rubber was booming during that time, and the Congo free estate had one lucrative source of wild rubber, and it was the Landolphia vines in the Central African rainforest.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    colony of Belgium; trading stations established in 1879, and Leopold II was given control of the Congo; the Belgian rulers savagely treated the indigenous peoples in their quest for rubber and ivory; Leopold's incursion into Congo basin raised the question of the political fate of black Africa (south of the Sahara); as did Britain's conquest of Egypt…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Leopold's Ghost

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Leopold had always wanted a colony; he had seen the other European nations amassing great wealth and natural resources that Leopold wanted a part of. By this time though, most of the New World had been colonized and all that was left was Africa. Leopold wanted to take part in the “slicing up of Africa”, making sure that he and his country Belgium would get its piece. Leopold found the perfect person in the explorer Henry Morton Stanley to begin his expedition into the Congo, Stanley was one of the most famous explorers of the day. Stanley had recently crossed the continent of Africa and was well know to Leopold through his articles published in newspapers. Under the guise of philanthropy and ending the slave trade, Stanley started to make his way through the Congo setting up infrastructure to gather the resources found in the Congo. Originally they were there for the ivory but as industrialization came into full swing, rubber became the most profitable resource found. There were great injustices with the native people in the Congo; people were basically slaves for Leopold and his colony only being used for the free labor, which is the exact opposite of the reasons Leopold was supposedly there. Leopold also set up the brutal ‘Force Publique” who ran the ivory and subsequent rubber siege. Some estimates of the death caused by the Colonization and the removal of rubber is that half of the native population died,…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A national movement started developing in the Congo ever since 1876, when King Leopold II took control of the country. Natives were never in support of annexation, for which they were never treated remotely well by the Europeans; tension was constant. The Congo was taken for it’s abundance of resources - King Leopold took the country as his own source of such resources, hence why it is considered a Tropical resourced-based colony. Joseph Kasavubu and Patrice Lumumba were Congo Nationalists that became increasingly strident as independence neared. For once, these leaders showed that they cared about the people, and not the country’s resources. Due to Ethnic and personal rivalries, the country was torn apart; most of the time with…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Double Standards

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Another example of King Leopold’s hypocrisy is his accepting the recognition for being a humanitarian. It is hard to imagine someone accepting labels like, “humanitarian” (92) or his efforts being called “the greatest humanitarian work of this time,” (46) when people are being tortured, raped, mutilated and murdered under his rule Forcing the local Congolese into slave labor when he himself denounced the Arab slave trade is by no means humanitarian. Or, putting the Congolese in chains and justifying it as teaching them, “the sanctity of work” (118) humanitarian…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout his reign as the King of the Belgians, Leopold II both followed and went against some of the ideas Niccolo Machiavelli lists in “The Prince”. One of the first things Leopold II did when he came into power in 1865 was pulling Belgium into neutrality in Europe due to recent shifts in the European balance of power. This goes against what Niccolo Machiavelli says in “The Prince” about what a prince must do to be esteemed. “A prince can also win prestige by declaring himself an ally of one side of a conflict. Neutrality alienates both the victor and the loser” (Machiavelli). He tells us in this quote that a prince should choose a side when making allies instead of staying neutral. He claims that the victor will see the nation as a “doubtful friend” while the loser will see them as a coward. Since Belgium was seen as a powerless country in Europe at the time, it probably would have been wise of him to choose a side with either France or Germany since they bordered Belgium and could have taken over at any time. In an instance where Leopold II did follow Machiavelli’s ideas, he lied in the Brussel’s Conference in 1876 by saying that by expanding into the Congo Free State, he was only “promoting scientific exploration of Africa for the advancement of knowledge and for the economic benefit of all humanity” (Blumberg, 161). Machiavelli states that “a prince who honors his word is generally praised by others”, but at the same time, he should be a master of deception by learning “how to fight both with laws and with force” (Machiavelli). Therefore, the best of all princes is one that keeps his promises, but knows when it’s the right time to lie. In this case, Leopold lied at the conference so that he could receive the Congo for his own benefit. Since Belgium was a Constitutional Monarchy in which the king had very little power over domestic affairs, he really didn't do much that would have affected the lives of his people directly. Therefore, by getting the Congo to…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supporting Evidence #1: “However, he licensed companies that brutally exploited Africans by forcing them to collect sap from rubber plants. At least 10 million Congolese died due to the abuses inflicted during Leopold's rule.”World history: Patterns of interactions. (2009). p#774…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Congo Free State, later named the Democratic Republic of Congo, drastically changed in 1876 when it was first colonized by King Leopold of Belgium. The colony of the Congo Free State was ruled solely by King Leopold, who used it for his own personal advancement. He took advantage of the country's well-known sources such as rubber. King Leopold of Belgium took all profits made off of the resources for himself and left the native people with nothing. In addition, King Leopold enslaved these natives and treated them poorly. They were forced to do hard and dangerous labor and if they did not meet the King’s standards, they could be killed. While the inhabitants of the Congo Free State could not do much to retaliate against the King, other countries…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whether it was for tires or waterproofing clothes, all Leopold knew was that there was a demand, and Leopold could provide it. Unlike other African and Asian countries that were attempting to catch up with the rubber boom, the Congo already had matured rubber trees, so Leopold wanted to stay ahead of the game while he still could (Hochschild 159). While in the past workers could be chained together and whipped to make them obey, rubber trees were scattered across the forest and vines were located in spots that required careful scaling of trees, so a new strategy had to be used (Hochschild 160). Making rubber was a difficult, painful process involving travelling deep into the forest in a desperate search for vines, cutting them open and waiting for the vines to tap, and then spreading the rubber syrup across one’s body to make the rubber dry; and the Congolese eventually realized this long, difficult process really wasn’t worth their effort. Europeans disagreed, knowing the potential profit, and established a forced labor system in the Congo (Hochschild 161). European soldiers would arrive in a village and then take the wives and children of the villages as hostage, refusing to give them back until the men met a rubber quota. Once enough rubber was collected to satisfy them, the soldiers would sell the women back for a few goats or other small…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays