Preview

Why Was Bismarck More Successful Than The Revolutionaries Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was Bismarck More Successful Than The Revolutionaries Research Paper
WHY WAS BISMARCK MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN THE REVOLUTIONARIES OF 1848-1849 IN UNIFY GERMANY?

All the German states were able to unify faster than Italy because a very strong German nationalism existed between them. Bismarck was able to bring this nationalism together and unify all states into a strong Germany. On the other side, the revolutionaries had many obstacles to be able to unite the Germans into one whole country. Bismarck was more successful than the revolutionaries for various reasons; including the 3 wars Prussia fought, his personality and the support he had from the Prussian king, William I.

One of the reasons why the revolutionaries were not as successful as Bismarck was because of the difference in religion, culture and on the ways Germany should be ruled. First of all, the north and the south of Germany had different religions: the north was Protestants and the south Catholics. This clash between religions made the unification of Germany more …show more content…
This assembly has a lack of German support; no army, which made them weak; it had problems on establishing the constitution and the denial of the Prussian king to accept the crown. This was a very important factor making the revolutionaries unsuccessful. Prussia was the strongest German state and, without it in the assembly, the little power it had would fade away. All German states agreed on giving the King of Prussia the power of the whole Germany. He rejected it because he would be less powerful and have more enemies if he ruled the whole Germany than only Prussia. The king, William I would lose all his divine rights, he would not be given the power of veto and the Austrians would be his enemy if he accepted it. The revolutionaries’ only chance of unifying Germany was this one, but the king rejected it and the plan faded away. This makes Bismarck more successful in the unification of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Emanual Leutze Washington Crossing The Delaware Analysis
    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emanual Leutze Washington Crossing The Delaware Analysis

    A National Assembly was established to create a national constitution and central government. However, when the crown of a constitutional Germany state was offered to the Prussian king, he declined this offer. This lead to the revolution to be unsuccessful. Leutze, who strong believed in democracy, painted this to inspire the German…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Political Establishment Succeeded in Maintaining the Political Status Quo Through a Policy .Docx Uploaded Successfully
    • 2396 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Political Establishment Succeeded in Maintaining the Political Status Quo Through a Policy .Docx Uploaded Successfully

    The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining the political status quo through more than just the policy of moderate reform, I would argue. Certainly the policy of moderate reform helped placate and divide socialists and liberals, the groups demanding social and constitutional change, to an extent. However, it is clear that the inflexible constitution itself that kept the ultimate power always in the Kaiser’s hands succeeded in maintaining the political status quo to a much further extent. The nationalism and patriotism upholding the Kaiser’s constitutional powers were very significant, as the vast majority of the German population and the breadth of the political nation valued the Kaiser, so he did not face any serious challenges in this period. This nationalism and patriotism was particularly felt by the traditional elites, who the constitution favoured, and pressed for nationalist foreign policy to unite against threats to the status quo, which did soak up a lot of the tensions of the period. It should also be noted despite this attempt to present a united front against threats to the status quo, parties looking after sectional interests meant that a disunity of the parties in the Reichstag did little for the cause of significant political modernisation, unable to work together to make any coherent challenges.…

    • 2396 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Was Metternich Responsible for Change in Germany in 1815
    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To What Extent Was Metternich Responsible for Change in Germany in 1815

    Another way in which Metternich was responsible for the lack of change in Germany was that he attacked the nationalist ideas himself; Unification of religion was a main focus for nationalists, yet in Germany the north was protestant, and the south and west were…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay
    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ccot Essay

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism in the Nineteenth Century: An in class DBQ about what Nationalism did for countries in the 19th century.
    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nationalism in the Nineteenth Century: An in class DBQ about what Nationalism did for countries in the 19th century.

    As nationalism and its ideas began the journey across Europe, it started to unite people into nation states. One of the prime examples of this unity is Germany. Before Germany was united as a whole in 1871, the nation was separated into Germanic states and Prussia. Determined to unite them into Germany because of their ethnicity, Wilhelm hired Otto Von Bismarck, who was just the guy to bring everyone together. Bismarck had used carefully thought out tactics to unite the Germanic states. They needed Prussia in order to become a powerful Germany. “Prussia….could no longer carry alone the power Germany required for its security” [Bismarck, Document 5]. Finally getting Prussia after the Franco-Prussian War, Germany was then united as a proud and powerful Germanic nation. The French were also united through Nationalism. After realizing their…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did the constitution ensure that the Kaisers power was preserved?
    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent did the constitution ensure that the Kaisers power was preserved?

    Kaiser had all power over Germany and with the desire for changes in the way Germany was run resulted in the improvements such as the creation of a constitution which was without a doubt crucial to the consolidation of the Kaisers position.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck Research Paper
    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Otto Van Bismarck Research Paper

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq
    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Alexander I Dbq

    Emperor Fredrick Wilhelm had to give up portions of Prussia’a territory, yet, due to the pressure by the other great powers. Still it had the chance of rebuilding and unifying much quicker than with a large and divided…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bizmarck
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bizmarck

    Certain motivating political and economic factors enabled Germany to gain its unification in the late nineteenth century. Its economic prosperity from the zollverein, technological advances, and political moves in terms of actions allowed it to ultimately acquire a solid unification by 1871.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap European History- Dbq Essay
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ap European History- Dbq Essay

    The people of Germany had always wanted independence and envied the freedom of the states of North America. There were many revolts within Germany and then there was the formation of the Frankfurt Assembly. The Frankfurt Assembly had offered Frederick William IV of Prussia a crown, in…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq
    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism Dbq

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism During World War 1
    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism During World War 1

    After 1890, Germany was more aggressive. Germany wanted to build up its influence in every part of the world. German foreign policy in these years was best expressed by the term 'Weltpolitik' (World Politics). Because German ambitions were extended to many parts of the globe, Germany came into serious conflicts with all other major powers of Europe (except Austria-Hungary) from 1890 to 1914. Bismarck used wars to cause national unity within Germany but these nationalistic feelings soon disappeared once the country was actually unified. There were several different types of people located in Germany, all of them containing different views on the how the Empire should be ruled. Bismarck was a part of the Junkers or upper class, who supported militarism, and didn't like universal suffrage because it was a threat on their way of life. On the other hand, Southern German states embraced a liberal constitution, and a movement towards democracy grew in this region. Politics were not the only difference; religion broke down nationalism as well. Catholics who lived in the Empire…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    German Revolution
    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    German Revolution

    It could also be added that it results in fundamental changes not only to the political system but also to the social and economic infrastructure, and is often accelerated by war or military defeat. Indeed Germany went through a period of much turmoil during the First World War and in the ensuing period after it. At the end of 1918 the nations morale was shattered by their humiliating defeat in war, shortages were severe to say the least and thousands of people were dying of the Spanish Influenza. Added to this, the demobilisation was slow and unorganised, the country was full of arms and it was felt by much of the population that now was the time to make a break from their imperial past and create a more just society. The revolution that occurred in Germany in 1918-1919 was not really a revolution-at least not in the traditional sense of the French Revolution of 1789 and the Russian Revolution of 1917, or even the German Revolution of 1848. Perhaps, by calling it the "German Revolution," we imply that things are conceived and done differently in Germany. Perhaps, that is true. Her political traditions were somewhat different from those of France and Russia. The conditions, which gave birth to revolution in November 1918, were unlike those of 1789 in France, and although somewhat similar to those in Russia in 1917, they were still not quite the same. Neither in France nor Russia did revolution come as a complete surprise even to purported revolutionaries. But it did in Germany. There was no sustained revolutionary agitation and strategy preceding it and when it came even the Social Democrats were completely overwhelmed by events. Therefore the German Revolution of 1918-1919 could be described as “a…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck And German Unification Essay
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bismarck And German Unification Essay

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich
    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck and Metternich

    Both, Metternich and Bismarck sought to bring unity and stability to their nations, but in different ways. While Metternich was hard at work using his diplomatic skills trying to prevent German unification during the first half of the nineteenth century, Bismarck on the other hand was known as the Iron Chancellor, in the later nineteenth century set on to unite Germany through his many wars.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics