Preview

Why the Rich Get Richer, While the Poor Get Poorer

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1570 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the Rich Get Richer, While the Poor Get Poorer
Kadeem Calhoun
English 1
Professor Grooms
21 February 2012
Our “Hourglass” Economy In these most recent economic times, it is clear to see that the rift between the extremely rich and the extremely poor is expanding, with those in the middle being stretched to one extreme or the other. There seems to be no reconciliations for this ever-growing disparity, as the corporations that used to comprise solely our economy lose national borders. Robert B. Reich discussed this issue in his work, Why the Rich Are Getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer. There are many reasons that go into play and many factors that sway each reason, but the major factors that influence our so-called “hourglass” economy are (but are not limited to) seniority, the increasing automation/mechanization of the workforce, outsourcing, and by the “secession of the rich.” A major player in the rift of the rich becoming richer while the poor are becoming poorer is seniority, namely in labor unions. Routine production jobs have vanished fastest in traditional unionized industries, where average wages have kept up with inflation. This is because the jobs of older workers in such industries are protected by seniority; the youngest workers are the first to be laid off. Faced with a decision of cutting wages or cutting the number of jobs, a majority of union members (secured by seniority) often voted for the latter (Reich 426). Another major factor of our “hourglass” economy is the increased automation/mechanization of the workforce. Technology nowadays seems to advance at an ever-increasing rate. As more and more “labor-saving” machines and robots are “employed” to do the jobs of hard-working people, more and more jobs seem to shrivel up and become a casualty of our ever more modern society. In the late 1980s, Nippon Steel joined with America’s ailing Inland Steel to build a new $400 million cold-rolling mill fifty miles west of Gary, Indiana. The mill was celebrated for its state-of-the-art



Cited: Lefcourt, Dave. "The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Get Decimated." Economy In Crisis: America 's Economic Report. WordPress, 10 Oct 2011. Web. 29 Feb 2012. < http://economyincrisis.org/content/rich-get-richer-poor-get-poorer-while-middle- class-gets-decimated>. Reich, Robert. "Why the Rich Are Getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer." A World of Ideas: Essential Readings For College Writers. Comp. Lee A. Jacobus. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2010. (pp. 422-437.) Print. Solmon, Paul. Making Sen$e: High & Low Retail. 2012. Video. PBS NewsHour, Web. 29 Feb 2012. <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/businessdesk/2012/01/the-rich-are-getting-richer-an.html>. Thompson, Jeff. Research Shows Rich Getting Richer Makes Poor Poorer. 2011. Video. TheRealNewsNetwork.com, Web. 29 Feb 2012. <http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=TAGFVU9lSXY>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Jacobus, L.A. (2010). A world of ideas: Essential readings for college writers. Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin’s…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sanghoee, Sanjay. "America 's Trickle "Up" Economy and the Rationalization of Inequality." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 07 Dec. 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2013.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Frank Too Big Too Ignore

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robert Frank, a professer at Cornell University, published an article for the New York Times on October 16, 2010. The title of the article was "Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore". In "Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore", Frank argues that there are differences in the social classes of the American people and that it is having a negative effect on our economy's growth. Frank explains that middle class citizens are in a struggle to maintain a good financial position. Meanwhile, the upper class citizens are spending copious amounts of money which makes it increasingly more difficult for the middle class to meet their basic needs. He says that the middle class are looking toward upper class citizens, comparing their posesions as well as their financial positions which makes the middle class feel financially unstable.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Modern economics have widened the gap between rich and poor in society. This gap can be illustrated by the fact that the three wealthiest individuals in the world have assets that exceed those of the poorest ten percent of the world’s population.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is shown in the fact that 68.7 percent of the world’s population only holds three percent of the wealth in the world and only 8.4 percent of the world’s population has 83.3 percent of the wealth of the world (Doc 6). The 68.7 percent of the world with the least amount of money often works in factories for very low wages, these factories being owned by the most wealthy. This relates to how those who get ahead have to step on others, with the wealthy exploiting the poor for their wealth.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summer Syllabus

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Patterns for College Writing. 12th edition. Ed. Laurie Kirszner and Stephen Mandell. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2012. ISBN 978-0-312-67684-1…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Weicher, John C. The Distribution of Wealth: Increasing Inequality?. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 1996.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The gap between the upper class and everyone else widens to a point where the richest “4,000 families in the U.S” have as much wealth as “11.6 million…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolt of the Rich

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Lofgren, Mike. "Revolt of the Rich”. The American Conservative, 27 Aug. 2012. Web. 11 Nov. 2012. http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/revolt-of-the-rich…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weixin Luo 01/01/13 AP Government, P5 Mr Mansfield The Flaw The documentary movie “The Flaw” identified income inequality as the flaw which caused the financial crisis in America. The movie argued that the widening gap between the rich and the poor contributed to the credit boom as wealth was accumulated in the top 1% of the American population. I agreed with the analysis in the movie and the explanation by the famous economists and distressing house owners. As a result of capitalism, the unequal distribution of wealth led to the conclusion that the rich get richer. The wages did not grow proportionally with the increasing costs of living standard as promised, and the middle class started to invest money they did not have, which was encouraged…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    author makes a point that wealth begins with one generation and typically trickles down from…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Great Divergence In America

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages

    With unreliable data and few resources to gain evidence of a faulty system; American politicians sometimes turn a blind eye or demean the importance of the issue. Obviously unemployment and economic deterioration are serious problems, but they are problems that would be further eased by addressing the current, historic, and growing imbalance in income inequality. The avoidance of such a current dilemma, such as the enormous gap of income, is an issue itself. For the problem to start resolving itself, we must bring the issue into the spotlight to be addressed by the officials who run our country. Income inequality, by contrast, is getting worse over time. Doesn’t it make more sense to focus attention on the problem that’s getting worse rather than all the problems—unemployment, the deficit, limited opportunity—that are not? But in turn, they could be resolved with addressing the prevalent income gap. (Noah 368)…

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Cox (former chief economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas) and Richard Alm (business reporter with the Dallas Morning News) agree that there is economic inequality but they feel like it is being blown out of proportion. They argue that these inequalities are not threatening. They think we should focus on whether the bottom is better or worst off in terms of consumption, instead of focusing on the gap of wealth between the top and bottom. They feel that the wealth from the top is the reason that the bottom benefit from breakthroughs in technology such as color TV’s, VCRs, computers and answering machines that is perceived to make like better for all (pg. 337). Cox and Alm reject the saying “The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer”. They do agree the rich are getting richer but they also believe the poor are getting richer or doing better also. They give examples of people such as Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, Bill Cosby, Michael Jordan, as well as others, who have risen from the middle to lower class to top or…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poverty In The United States

    • 2924 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Former assistant secretary in the Department of Health and Human Services, Peter Edelman, argues that "inequality in the distribution of wealth is a major cause of poverty," he also adds that the problem is getting worse (Capitalism Causes Poverty). "Twenty years ago, the wealthiest one percent had as much income as the poorest 20 percent of the population; today, that one percent controls as much wealth as the poorest 35 percent" (Capitalism Causes Poverty). This is one illustration of how it is harder today for those in poverty to rise higher in society because the wealthiest people control a substantially larger amount of money than they did before. Also the article from the Economist, Meritocracy in America, shows this uneven balance in wealth by stating "In 2001 the top 1% of households earned 20% of all income and held 33.4% of all net worth" (Meritocracy in America). The article also declares that the top 1% has not controlled this much wealth since before the depression (Meritocracy in America). Once again this shows how it has become incredibly hard for people to achieve a state of living above the poverty level. More evidence to support this argument, once again, comes from the article Meritocracy in America. The article proclaims that between 1979 and 2000 "the income of households in the lowest fifth grew by 6.4% while that of households in the top fifth grew by 70%. The family income of the top 1% grew by 184%. Back in 1979 the average income of the top 1% was 133 times that of the bottom 20%; by 2000 the income of the top 1% had risen to 189 times that of the bottom fifth" (Meritocracy in America). Again this shows how hard it is to ascend to a higher level in society. A study was done by Thomas hertz, an economist at American University in Washington DC. He studied families over…

    • 2924 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This results to the division between the miniscule elite and the masses including the sinking middle class…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays