Preview

Why the compromises from 1846~1861 failed to prevent the Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1117 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the compromises from 1846~1861 failed to prevent the Civil War
The compromises from 1846 to 1861 were, by their intentions, to postpone the struggle between the north and the south temporarily but not to solve it. The foundational problems, like the the slavery itself, the differences in social structure and economic system and the expansion of slavery, were left. The increasing struggle between the abolitionists and slave owners and between the newly formed Republican Party and the Democratic Party kept putting those questions in front of the US people. The compromises themselves failed to satisfy the wants of both sides, enraged the north and frightened the south, so up to the election of Lincoln, the tension built up to a climax and finally broke out to become a civil war.

A major difference between the north and the south was the legality of slavery, according to compromise of 1820 the line of 36 ' '30 ' north divided this country into two parts, the southern parts contained with a large amount of plantations and slave owners. In the north the increasingly flourished international trades, the developing industrialization and the urbanization pushed the process to form the market economy, but in the west, because of the allowance of slaves, most economic activities were labor intensive as well as based on agriculture, which limited the development in industries and urban areas. Up to 1860 only New Orleans could be counted as a "city" with 168 thousands of people in the south. Although the south produced nearly 3/4 of the world 's cotton production, the industrial products were only 10% for the whole US. Slavery, as the foundation of southern economy, further influenced the opinions about race, the politics and the laws, while the north, mostly seen the south as behindhand and as a barrier of the advancement of US economy. One of the influences was about social structure, in the south the idea of patriarchy was dominant, and as the fact that the big slave owners gained social statue and political careers at the same

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Civil War which lasted from 1861 to 1877 was mainly caused by the diverging society between the North and the South. The North and the South had different goals. There were many factors that led to the war and the chief ones were political and economic differences between the North and the South. The North's aggression to control the South had led to the point where it was intolerable. The issue on slavery was one of the cause of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South's economy. The slaves were needed to work on plantations which helped the South prospered. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery which they thought was an disgrace to the Union. Compromises were proposed working toward an end to slavery. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise which made Maine, a free state, and Missouri, a slave state, excluded slavery from Louisiana Territory and everything above the 36?30?north latitude. Other compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 did pleased both sides. The Compromise included admitting California as a free state and interstate slave trade to be abolished which went in favour of the North. The Compromise also went with the South when it included stricter fugitive slave laws and New Mexico and Utah were created without slave restrictions. A book called, "Uncle Tom's Cabin" was also published at this time emphasising the evils of slavery. This added tension between the North and the South. The compromises seemed to have settled the issue of slavery but it was just putting back the problem. The North and the South were far from settling the slave issue. Another reason that caused the South to go to war was the difference in economic policies. The North was expanding more in the commercial and industrial side while the South was reliant on agriculture. Cities and factories had developed in the North and in the South, it was still staple-producing and agrarian. The North's industry…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the time, compromise helps stop a fight from starting and is generally a way to end a fight. However, the Civil War was only delayed by compromise because both sides didn’t want to give anything up. Compromise’s role in delaying the Civil War was keeping both the North and South happy, but it didn’t help.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Civil War was the final turning point in creating the country that is established in today’s era. Starting in the 1830’s, as the Northern and Southern states conflicts grew with aggression and disagreement, the push for the civil war would be inevitable. Slavery being the top disagreement between the two, other conflicts arose; such as, ideals between abolitionist and southern politicians. Historical events, taking place in order to establish the chain reaction that lead to the Civil War; such as, The election of 1860, Raid on Harper’s Ferry, Bleeding Kansas, Dred Scott Decision, and The Kansas-Nebraska Act. Irrepressible conflict quickly appeared over the disagreeing ideals of how these two co-existing economies could not become one.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While the southern states were in favor of slavery, the northern states vehemently opposed the idea. An expansion of slavery would have meant an increase in the territorial space and population. This in turn would give the Southern states increased power in the House. Although the Civil War had some time to initiate, the Compromise played a major role in the laying the groundwork for the war that was to come. It contributed to the division and disagreement between north and south, surrounding the topic of slavery. The issue built severe tension between the two sides of the…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most political disputes were mostly over the issue of slavery, the two sides of this issue were should slavery be abolished in the union, or should it be left alone. Because slavery was such a hot topic, many compromises including the Missouri compromise, and the compromise of 1850 touched on slavery, and tried to appease both sides. Compromise seemed to be the best and most effective to use in the early nineteenth century, but by 1860 this no longer seemed possible. The two differing viewpoints had little room for compromise this change being because of political, social, and intellectual reasons.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before Civil War began, even as the country was being set up with the Articles of Confederation, slavery was an issue that had to be dealt with. When the final vote for the ratification of the Constitution some states would not sign on it if slavery were made illegal. They decided to deal with it in twenty years. After the compromise of 1820 they limited slavery to the south, which would split the country into two for the next forty years. The South would feel that slavery was the best thing for the slave for it gave them something productive to do. The North however as a majority felt slavery as a horrible thing by the cruel ways the slave owners would treat and beat their slaves. There were also those who went and helped free and bring slaves…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was drafted by Henry Clay whose idea was from a Senator from Illinois by the name Stephen A. Douglas. The Compromise was passed by the US Congress on September 1850, mostly to pacify the issue of slavery and territorial boundaries between the North and South. Issues around slavery increased between the North and South. Consequently, ten years after the Compromise of 1850, the American Civil War began.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A divided nation due to slavery in territories gained in the Mexican-American War were resolved in the Compromise of 1850. The importance of the Compromise lies on the continuation of peace achieved by the Missouri Compromise, despite sectionalism. The views from the North and South were contradictory, but the Compromise made them reach a temporary equilibrium regarding politics. It accomplished what it wanted to achieve at the time: to revitalize the Union and maintain…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First thing first, what is the compromise of 1850? The compromise of1850 was a set of five bills that eventually lead to the civil war. Its purpose was to keep away confrontation between the northern free slave states and the southern slave states and keep the nation united. The first bill consist of California being admitted to the union as a free state. The second bill allowed New Mexico and Utah settlers to vote on an issue. The third bill relied on Texas loosing New Mexico territory, but $10 million was received from the government for the loss. The slave trade in the district of Colombia was abolished which created the fourth bill. Last but not least the fifth bill passed a new Fugitive slave act.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The biggest factor in the changing economic and social economy for the north and the south was slavery. The south had many plantations, which were the main source of income for the southerners. Their main crop was cotton and tobacco. The southerners heavily relied on slave labor to harvest their fields. The north consisted of mostly traders and manufacturers. They believed that slavery was wrong and relied on American workers to work in the factories and businesses. However, this did lead to harsh working conditions and both women and child laborers. This also saw the expansion of the middle class. Trading within the United States was also encouraged. The different regions would trade with each other what they had in excess for what they needed. The south traded a lot with Europe. These are some major factors that attributes to the differentiation between the north and the south.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political differences between the North and South ranged from deciding on what the budget of the United States should be used for to what should be the main crop produced and sold for income. in the 1860s the government made a lot more decisions on things such as what to produce and how to produce it then currently in the United States. The reason the north and south problems on what crops to produce had such an impact was because of the type of soil the North and South had. The reason industrialism flourished in the north was because the lack of soil needed for farming. The north farming situation was set up for more smaller farmsteads instead of the south with relied on more heavy farming and plantations. This taking us back to slavery. Due to the prosperity of farming in the south they relied more heavily on slaves than the north. political differences in the north and south were too diverse for the two parts of the country to continue as one this leading to succession of South Carolina in…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emancipation Dbq

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conflict erupted due to the point of high tension between the continuous dissension over the critical issue. Lincoln supported emancipation as a war measure for the beginning of the war in order to gather support for the Union. Lincoln declared that he will side with border states who abolish slavery. He hoped that support from these critical states would play a decisive role in the war. Emancipation was still seen as a war measure because there was significant opposition from the conservative supporters. However, Lincoln explains to a religious group that emancipation would actually restore legitimacy for the Union in Europe, as the consensus there was set on an antislavery sentiment. This would prevent European dependence on textiles and undermine King Cotton diplomacy. In order to set a moral framework, Jefferson Davis explains that emancipation would hurt slaves and the basis of his argument was that slavery was a justifiable evil. Lincoln still doesn’t fully oppose Davis by taking the position of abolitionism. Instead, he viewed emancipation only as a war measure and doesn’t extend full rights. Davis views it as an immoral act as it would create revolts and a race war in the South. The issue with compromise positions was that they were mostly ineffective in containing slavery in the South. Instead, they created dissent throughout the congress, making the critical issue worse. A motive…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was an issue in slave states from South and Free states North in 1800s. South states were the agricultural area so they needed slaves and support it, but not the North state. Several disputes exists, Congress performed compromises to settle these disputes. But these compromises could not hold for longer. (1820 - 1861: HOLDING THE UNION TOGETHER) Missouri Compromise in 1820, Nat Turner's Rebellion in 1831,…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Causes

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There were many attempts made to make well-rounded compromises but eventually they all turned out to be unsuccessful. Southerners assumed that Lincoln would end the growth of slavery until there were no slaves left, and so as this was a possibility, seven southern (slave) states had already seceded before Lincoln even became the President of the United States of America; if they had not done this they were going to face an everlasting, minor faction. This would then be giving the Northern states more power (not what the Southern slave states wanted). (Catton 219, 220,…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At this time in history, the South was largely a plantation agricultural economy and their population was very slow to rise. On the other hand, the North had sincerely embraced an industrial economy and the birth rate soared. It soon became evident that the South was losing hold on their part of the government, something that became clear when talk of the abolition of slavery rolled around; it wasn't so much an issue that the government sought to abolish slavery as that ordering it on a Federal level was in violation of the Tenth Amendment and states' rights. Given all of these volatile circumstances happened near or around the same time, a conflict was nearly inevitable, however if handled correctly, the civil war may have been…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays