Preview

Why Should The Uk Monarchy Be Abolished?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
727 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Should The Uk Monarchy Be Abolished?
Should the UK Monarchy be abolished?

There have been long talks and debates on whether or not the monarchy should be abolished, many people have strong contrasting views about this topic and I myself have a strong opinion about this as well. I strongly agree with abolishing the UK monarchy and throughout this essay I will be discussing reason for and against. As we all know the monarchy has been part of the British constitution for centuries and has played a big part in the past British culture but do we really need a monarchy in the 21st century and if we do what way do we benefit from this.

To start off firstly I’d like to talk about equality. The monarchy creates inequality as they consider themselves above everyone else. What I mean by this is that since that the royal family think they are different because they took over the United Kingdom and they think they have all the power in the world but at the end of the day they are still same as everyone else. The Monarchy was established centuries before United Kingdom became a democracy. We don’t have a President but the queen would in this case be considered as a president although she hardly has any participation in Politics and she was not voted in, she was just appointed queen. This is not equality as no one is any different from the queen but she is still picked as the
…show more content…
This is the costs of royal palaces, utility bills and also Travel. £300 million could be spent more effectively towards maybe education or even defence. My view is that this money goes to a waste and could be spent of better use and maybe also help homeless or needy people. The monarchy has spent “£13.3 million on building maintenance” according to The Telegraph and let’s be honest the queen doesn’t need this to happen she wants It to happen as she has taken advantage of her income and is spoilt by her

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    George III’s government should be overthrown because, people who governed unrestrained by law or constitution and exercised absolute power oppressively, brutally, or unjustly over nations are not only violating the constitution, but also considered tyrants. All people are born with the right to life, liberty, and pursuit of Happiness.…

    • 49 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    England’s choice of limited government had positives and negatives. In England before the bill of rights they had a monarchy. James I wrote that “for kings are not only Gods lieutenants upon earth and sit upon…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I will be analysing the strengths of the British constitution and comparing it to a codified constitution, I will also discuss its weaknesses and whether ‘extremely strong’ is an exaggeration and it lacks the qualities of a reliable constitution.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason being the fact that monarchs are more worried about the benefit of their county. A president for example, may have conflict of interest, whereas a monarch most likely will not. Furthermore, with a democratic republic, issues must go through a process which cannot be quickly achieved. A king or queen however, can make decisions and put them into effect with minor delay, if any. Another benefit of monarchy is they will not become corrupt because they have not made a commitment to any groups that needs to be fulfilled. They are above the influence of any political…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The British Monarchy is a show piece that stands to represent the old ways of the world. They have been losing power gradually but steadily over the last two hundred years. In Australia their presence serves as merely ceremonial with a little political power that is seldom used. However removing the monarchy from the structure of our country would mean losing sporting opportunities, relations with UK and an affinity with our culture as an English colony which steadily grew from rags to riches under hard circumstances.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have debated the powers of the king and parliament for centuries, and the events that molded the power balance between the two institutions. This power balance had been changed to a large extent by the end of the seventeenth century from what it had been at the beginning; as power and control slipped out of the monarchy’s grasp and into parliament’s hands. For could James the 1st have ever imagined that in a few years time his son would be beheaded on the charge of treason, and the monarchy itself would be abolished? Could William the 3rd have contemplated having the power to command a standing army, and conducting a foreign policy independent of Parliament? No one can deny the political changes of this era, however, what can be argued is what form this change took; an evolution or a revolution?…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia should cut all ties with the British Monarchy and become a Republic – Negative…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clash between the two political models of absolutism and constitutionalism is the catalyst for the progression in English politics. With William and Mary as their rulers, the Parliament didn’t need to worry about a Catholic ruler and even better they were able to get their rulers to recognize the Bill of Rights of 1689. Finally able to limit the power of the monarch, making the ruler subject to the law and the consent of Parliament, the theory of a constitutional monarchy was put into action through this bill. This is the beginning of England’s, later Great Britain, rise to being a world power and setting an example that others will soon…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitutional Analysis

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitutional Monarchy functions by Parliament that consist of two houses which are the House of Lords and House of Commons. The House of Lords is a body of Monarch appointed by the Queen or King whereas the House of Commons is a body of elected officials voted in by the People. We have the Queen or King as the figurehead for our government. Parliament will be responsible but not limited to collecting taxes, declaring war, borrowing and coining money, naturalization, and impeachment. The people will have a say and with whom they elect into the House. There are more liberties that the people have but at regulated prices such as, the right to bear arms. People are allowed to bear arms but with more of a strict licensing to obtain a firearm. People have the right to marry no matter race, gender, preference, or religion. Also, gender equality and drinking and voting age are set at the legal age of 18 when people are able to join the military and risk their own life for their country. It doesn't seem to have many disadvantages as it is truly mixing royalty and commoners together. We made the terms and age which officials can…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British Monarchy has had a large influence on Canada since European exploration of the Americas began in the late 15th century. However, over the last few decades there has been increasing debates over the relevance of the British monarchy in modern day Canada. Over the past few decades there has been a shift from monarchy to constitutional monarchy; this means the the King and Queen no longer have executive power to do what they please, the power now falls to an elected parliament (Citation). Because of this the monarchy has taken a largely symbolic role. Many people would argue that because this is a largely symbolic role, is not longer necessary and should therefore be abolished in Canada. The British Monarchy is proven to be an effective…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the separate branches; legislative, executive and judicial, holds members that were either elected or appointed by the Prime Minister (Martin 2). The only one not to comply to this is the Queen herself. The constitutional monarchy is based on the ancient form of authority that not only prevents the leader from being chosen fairly, it also prevents the opportunity to remove an unsuitable one. Other than death or dethroning, there is no concrete way to dismiss a royal figure from their standing, with the current laws of the throne. Compared to the other members of the government, which are given a chance to be replaced in the quadrennial elections or in the case of a Member of Parliament, by a by-election (“By-elections” 1), the sovereign can’t be reinstated by someone else. Regardless of the circumstance, laws have been put in place as a way to protect the citizens from the chance of a person of power exploiting it. These laws don’t apply to the Monarchy. Many say that Queen Victoria is a crucial figure in our past, which is true, but they don’t acknowledge the vast amount of Royals who have abused their power rather than using it for good. Numerous examples can be found throughout history, all because of the uncertainty that comes with having a self-proclaimed leader, that can’t be removed by the citizens (Barksdale 1). Clearly, the monarchy is an unfit and potentially dangerous form of government, and shouldn’t be continued in this country, which can be sustained without…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    European History

    • 2402 Words
    • 8 Pages

    absolute monarchy is an illegitimate form of government because it infringes on the natural rights to life and liberty that everyone is born with.…

    • 2402 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all…

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Monarchy

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    More attention needs to be on the part that Monarchies have played regarding the evolution of Canadian democracy. Many Canadians tend to forget the importance of the Crown, though they are not to blame as it is a subject hardly heard of or spoken about in school curricula and media outlets. For five centuries, the Crown has been a symbol of strength in Canada. With an extremely stable and responsible government, the Crown’s involvement is disregarded and forgotten. According to many polls, majority of the Canadians who are aware of the Canadian Monarchy wish to abolish it completely and would rather have a head of state from within Canada but, “Monarchy advocates argue for its continued relevance in parliamentary function and as a symbol of…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    played a big rule in the whole army thing because they thought I have already raised taxes so I can do anything and it will happen without a doubt.people that were in the Monarchy believed in the divine rights…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays