Why Should The Legal Age For Tattooing Be Lowered

Why Should the Legal Age for Tattooing be Lowered? Would you prefer your child/grandchild have a safe tattoo or a potentially life threatening disease? A tattoo may be a scary thing for the parent of a teenager, but in the heart of a parent who loves their child the possible dangers of a tattoo achieved through the ambition of a teenager should far outweigh a little bit of ink-stained skin. Legal tattoo parlors are required to be licensed, provide a safe and sanitary environment, follow proper procedures for tattooing, and check for proper ages on their clients. Many parents are against their children getting tattoos. In the event that someone under age has no parental consent to be tattooed, the teens’ choices are to wait until they are old enough for legal tattooing or to find a way to get the tattoo they
Teenagers can think. Teenagers know what they want. Teenagers have the ability to distinguish right from wrong and good from bad. However, the ability to decide what we will want in ten years is not determined by our age. The dangers and risks of infections, skin reactions and blood borne diseases are the same for any person of any age. Having a tattoo applied raises these risks for all ages. Having a tattoo applied by an unlicensed person raises the risks even more. Teenagers are usually quite determined to do what they have on their minds, and getting a tattoo is just one of the things that might come up. Teenagers should be able to have a tattoo applied safely and freely, if that is what they want. When something is bound to happen, our society can make it happen safely. When it comes to tattoos, we can keep our teenagers safe by lowering the age at which people can have a tattoo applied. This would provide the option for teenagers to get their tattoos in a sanitary and professional environment, where they would be educated on the risks