Why Should Strict Gun Laws Be Banned
There would be a significant amount of decreased deaths attributable to gun violence if stricter laws were in place. Guns can cause the death of countless lives because of murder, self defense, or an accidental occurrence. Therefore, stricter gun laws can decrease death rates in the United States. Moreover, states that do not have strict gun laws have higher deaths and injuries related to guns. Also, better background checks should be in place to prevent permitting guns to the wrong hands. Furthermore, the Second Amendment is used for the wrong reasons. The use of the assault weapons should be banned in the United States. First, there would be less deaths if we have stricter state gun-laws.To start, the government needs to start to have
…show more content…
Some times that a person that has a bad background check is going to use a gun to injure or kill people. They might use them to defend themselves from criminals and invaders. Gun ownership can avert crime than cause more crime for a person that owns a gun.(Right to bear arms) President Donald Trump said if people had guns in California on the other side where bullets are being shot at them and 14 and 15 of them would have died.However if the people that died wouldvé had guns the death count wouldvé been lower because they wouldvé had something to defend there self.(Should More Gun Control).The Second Amendment does say that itś a personś right to own a gun and if they're being shot at and there with a group of people and 12 of them die if the person didn´t have their gun. President Trump assumes that if that person wouldvé had their gun the death count wouldvé been lower than 12.He also agrees that people with bad background checks can use guns for self defense.Yet the Second Amendment does not say people should buy guns for self defense.The purpose of the Second Amendment 1791 when it was ratified, it wasn't for people to buy guns for self defence. In 1791 it was a person right to own or buy a gun because a lot of people were serving in the militia. …show more content…
The government should discuss the issue about gun violence and how they could prevent deaths and injuries with
Some times that a person that has a bad background check is going to use a gun to injure or kill people. They might use them to defend themselves from criminals and invaders. Gun ownership can avert crime than cause more crime for a person that owns a gun.(Right to bear arms) President Donald Trump said if people had guns in California on the other side where bullets are being shot at them and 14 and 15 of them would have died.However if the people that died wouldvé had guns the death count wouldvé been lower because they wouldvé had something to defend there self.(Should More Gun Control).The Second Amendment does say that itś a personś right to own a gun and if they're being shot at and there with a group of people and 12 of them die if the person didn´t have their gun. President Trump assumes that if that person wouldvé had their gun the death count wouldvé been lower than 12.He also agrees that people with bad background checks can use guns for self defense.Yet the Second Amendment does not say people should buy guns for self defense.The purpose of the Second Amendment 1791 when it was ratified, it wasn't for people to buy guns for self defence. In 1791 it was a person right to own or buy a gun because a lot of people were serving in the militia. …show more content…
The government should discuss the issue about gun violence and how they could prevent deaths and injuries with