Preview

Why Nations Fail - Chapter 5 Review

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Nations Fail - Chapter 5 Review
Levisalles Amaury Georg-August-Universität

Sommer Semester 2012 Göttingen

WHY NATIONS FAIL
D. ACEMOGLU & J.A. ROBINSON

Seminar Paper

CHAPTER 5 "I'VE SEEN THE FUTURE, AND IT WORKS": GROWTH UNDER EXTRACTIVE INSTITUTIONS
What Stalin, King Shyaam, the Neolithic Revolution, and the Maya city-states all had in common and how this explains why China's current economic growth cannot last.

Summary

Resume of the Key Statements of the Chapter Description of the Original Researches used By The Authors Opposition to the Theories of Acemoglu and Robinson Personal Point of View Bibliography

3 6 9 12 15

2

Resume of the Key Statements of the Chapter
In this chapter, D. Acemoglu and J.A. Robinson explain how growth under extractive institutions is not sustainable in the long term and always leads to the collapse, in one way or another, of these institutions. The title of the chapter, "I've seen the future and it works", is a quotation from the autobiography of Lincoln Steffens (1931). He was then speaking about the communist model that he had discovered on a diplomatic mission to Russia. The title of the chapter is of course ironic since it is well known that the Soviet System broke down in 1991. In this chapter the authors tackle different aspects of Extractive Institutions and explain throughout many concrete examples as to why the multiple facets of these institutions lead to the end of them. Extractive political and economical institutions are "structured to extract resources from the many by the few" and "concentrate power in the hand of a few, who will then have incentives to maintain and develop these institutions" (page 430). Dictatorship is the best example of an extractive institution as in this case power is concentrated in the hands of very few, if not only the dictator himself. These types of institutions are mostly founded in authoritarianism and totalitarianism political systems (dictatorship being an authoritarianism type



Bibliography: Berliner, Joseph S. (1976). "The Innovation Decision of Soviet Industry". Introduction. http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262520524chap1.pdf Gregory, Paul R., and Mark Harrison (2005). "Allocation Under Dictatorship: Research in Stalin 's Archives". Pp721-761. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/164/1/WRAP_Harrison_jel05.pdf Levy, David M., and Sandra J. Peart (2009). "Soviet Growth and American Textbooks". http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1517983 Vansina, Jan (1978). "The Children of Woot: A History of the Kuba People". Review and website. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7883556&previo us=true&jid=AFR&volumeId=50&issueId=02 http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/kuba/hd_kuba.htm Smith, Bruce D. (1998). "The Emergence of agriculture". Abstract and Review. http://www.springerlink.com/content/k152t1364g25u430/ http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FAGS%2FAGS134_02%2FS002185969 900753Xa.pdf&code=5433aabe46707f2591802b67ab63f032 Moore, Andrew M. T., G. C. Hillman, and A. J. Legge (2000). "Village on the Euphrates From Foraging to Farming at Abu Hureyra". Website. http://www.rit.edu/academicaffairs/abuhureyra/statement.php Martin, Simon, and Nikolai Grube (2000). "Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens: Deciphering the Dynasties of the Ancient Maya". Review. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&pdftype=1&fid=90906&jid=CA J&volumeId=11&issueId=02&aid=90905   15   Webster, David (2002). "The Fall of the Ancient Maya". Reviews. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=187280&jid=CAJ&volumeI d=13&issueId=02&aid=187279&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession= http://www.mindfully.org/Heritage/2003/Civilization-Collapse-EndJun03.htm http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2007/proceed/papers/FORES170.pdf Fukuyama, Francis (26 March 2012). "Acemoglu and Robinson on Why Nations Fail". The American Interest. http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/fukuyama/2012/03/26/acemoglu-and-robinson-onwhy-nations-fail/ Yglesias, Matthew (22 March 2012). "Two Cheers for Growth Under Extractive Institutions". Slate. http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/04/03/extractive_institutions_are_they_really_w hy_nations_fail_.html Yglesias, Matthew (10 April 2012). "Mysteries of Growth Under Extractive Institutions". Slate. http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/04/10/extractive_institutions_sometimes_work_ but_why_.html Buttonwood (14th April 2012). "The question of Extractive Elites". The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/21552589   16

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq Research Paper

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is, perhaps, and argument for Stalin's 'Bolshevik firmness' to have enabled the Soviet Union to accomplish incredible feats regarding its move from a mostly agrarian society in the early 1920s to…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP Euro DB

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the extent to which the economic and political ideals of Karl Marx were realized in post-revolutionary Russia in the period from 1917 to 1939.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Considering that in 1881 Russia was incredibly underdeveloped and mainly based on agriculture, there were many changes made. The first finance minister of Alexander’s reign was Nikolai Bunge and he introduced laws which reduced the tax burden on peasants in 1882, and also established the Peasant Land Bank offering loans to peasants to help increase their holdings and increase productivity. The “Great Spurt” under Witte between 1892 and 1903 was a period of great economic transformation. Much emphasis was placed on the production of capital goods like iron and steel, coal and machinery. Also, much investment was made from abroad mainly France, Britain and Belgium: within Russia the peasantry was also further taxed to pay for this. The result of this was incredibly dramatic. Over half of the industrial workforce was employed in factories with more than a thousand workers by 1900 as industrial growth was concentrated in industrial areas like Moscow and Ukraine. The population also rose dramatically due to this rapid industrialization for example the population of St Petersburg doubled between 1890 and 1940 from 1 to 2 million. The completion of the Trans-Siberian also meant that influence in the East was increased and the economic potential of Siberia was opened up. In some respects Stolypin was an economic reformer, as he wanted to create a prosperous peasant class to be loyal to the Tsar. In November 1906 he passed a law that freed peasants from the commune and later redemption payments were abolished. This had been a huge weight on the peasants since 1861 and could be argued to be a…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ferguson term paper

    • 1152 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Ferguson, Niall. The Great Degeneration: How Institutions Decay and Economies Die. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: • Civilization in the West 6th Edition ; by Mark Kishlansky, Patrick Geary, Patricia O’Brien; Published by Pearson Longman.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivization was designed to modernize Russia’s agriculture by merging farms and placing them under state control. In the short term, this policy resulted in famines and Stalin’s ‘war’ against the Kulaks; wealthy peasants who opposed communism. By 1935, 5 million people had died from starvation and all 7 million Kulaks had been liquidized, through shooting or the labour camps or ‘Gulags’. However, by 1939, Collectivization was working efficiently with 99% of land merged and 90% of peasants living ¼ of a million Kolkhoz. Although at a heavy price, the exports needed to obtain the capitol for industrialization had been acquired.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    heyo potao

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Describe and analyze the long-term social and economic trends in the period 1860 to 1917 that prepared the ground for revolution in Russia.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ipa Cheat Sheet

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages

    AIPA 2: UNDERSTANDING ACTORS, INTERESTS & POWER Institutions  Basic level – states exist to provide (1) defence and (2) social order  this requires the presence of a functioning economy.  State not only produces, consumes and redistributes; it’s also the main source and enforcer of “rules of games”.  “Rules of games” are institutions  institutional quality is related to economic performance.  Evidence: No country has gotten rich with bad institutions. Politics  Politics is the process of creating new institutions. Existing institutions create a constraint on this process.  Political processes can be analysed in terms of Actors involved in the processes, their interests and their relative power (AIP).  Actors: Political, Societal(land, labour, capital, business associations, unions, students, military), International (hegemon, institutions)  Interests: Assume, Deduce or Judge by stated intention and observed behaviour.  Power: voter base, past performance, military control, resource control, shared nationalism/ethnicity, moral authority, int’l support  Usually, the actor with greatest relative power wins. IPA 3: STATE STRUCTURES 1: ENDS, DECISION-MAKING & IMPLEMENTATION Ends = the ultimate end of economic policy, not necessarily what is said.  Self-enrichment - “rentier state” e.g. Zaire, Congo. Anything possible for highest bidder.  Economic Development - “developmental state” e.g. Japan, S. Korea. Risk-sharing and high intervention with bias to domestic firms.  Equal outcomes - “welfare state” e.g. Scandinavia, Netherlands. Minor state intervention, heavily regulated, little adjustments & intervention.  Equal opportunity - “regulatory state” e.g. US, Hong Kong. Minor state intervention, light regulations & adjustments Decision-Making…

    • 2135 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Soviets had a command economy, an economy where the government decides what goods will be produced, how much is produced, and the pricing of the goods. At first there was a very long period of rapid growth from 1950-1973. The Soviet economy posted an estimated annual growth rate in gross national product of 5.7% from 1950 to 1960, and 5.2% from 1960 to 1970(JOHNSTON, Paragraph 6). Because the Soviet Union’s economy was so underdeveloped and controlled, it could easily adapt to and imitate the newest western technology. While this strategy was very effective short-term, The forced industrialization at the expense of personal consumption led to the country being unable to innovate in its economy.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious Traditions

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Kishlansky, M., Geary, P., O’Brien, P. (2008). Civilization in the west (7th Ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Longman.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper 1

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Compare and contrast Stalin’s view of industralization as a war economy as expressed in Sources B and E. (6 marks)…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. World Society and the Nation-State by John W. Meyer, John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez…

    • 1337 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Structured Inequality

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Social stratification is an important concept in sociology and has many definitions which revolve around it being ‘a socially constructed concept’ which is based on ‘structured inequality’; ‘the inequality may be in the form of income and wealth, an individual’s biological or ethnic make-up, or may be as a result of age or disability’ (Scottish Further Education Unit, 2006). In addition, the inequalities exist ‘among persons and between social groups with respect to the access, acquisition and distribution of scarce and valued resources’ (Giddens et al 2003; Lenski 1966; Sanderson 1999; Slomczynski and Shabad 2000) resulting in a somewhat ‘rigid subdivision of a society into a hierarchy of layers’ (Business Dictionary.Com, 2011). The effects…

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays