Preview

Why Murder Is Wrong

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
71 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Murder Is Wrong
Murder is wrong because of the damaged it causes to society. It cost people a great amount of money. Also it leaves people emotionally scarred. Murder creates negative feelings like pain and emotional depression. Everyone else probably have the same feelings about themselves about being killed. No one wants to die and an individual’s death can lead to negative emotions. Therefore people decide killing is bad since nobody wants to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Others are simply against it as they believe that retribution is morally flawed this is a shared view with also numerous Christians. Capital Punishment is wrong as it is just a sanitized form of vengeance, numerous times have there been scenes of howling mobs attacking prison vans containing those accused of murder on their way to and from court suggesting that vengeance remains a major ingredient in the public popularity of capital punishment. Overall the aim of capital punishment is to prevent further crime from occurring however this does not work, the factor that truly deters the likelihood of crime is simply the possible occurrence of being caught and punished. In 1988 a survey was conducted for the UN to determine the relation between the death penalty and homicide rates.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is killing ever justified? Yes, killing is justified in certain situations. An example would be if a burglar comes into someone's house. The first thing they do is grab a gun or knife and use self defense. Some people will say no they should be punished people should not kill anyone under any conflict. Then, some people say just the opposite. Another example would be during a person's life time they can experience very painful illnesses. People should have the rights where they can die when they want only, if they are in a very painful stage of an illness or injury.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hundreds of Americans are wrongfully sent to death row. This means that hundreds of people die innocently. Killing people for killing others is wrong in any situation. Though some people say when murder is punished with death, less people will commit the crime, murdering is uncivil, especially when the person is wrongfully accused.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are not many absolute truths in the world. Almost every point can be argued and justified. But if there is one truth universally recognized, one truth upon which societies the world over have been based on, it is that murder is wrong. The willful termination of a life is immoral. If we as a society accept that to be true, how then can we condone the death penalty? How is government sanctioned murder a moral option? The legal system is not fool proof, nothing man-made is. How then can we claim that an imperfect court of law, pervious to human error and persuasion, has the power to lay down the most perfectly irreversible solution of them all: death. Even after the appellate courts have been exhausted, it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime they did not do. If there is even that small possibility, how can we, in all good conscious, make it legal to put someone to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the argument regarding absolute moral prohibition, the third premise is the one that is most open to objection. It goes as follows, “If it is wrong to murder an innocent person even when doing so would save more than one innocent person then it is our duty to murder more than one innocent person in order not to murder a single innocent person.” In order to understand the argument, one must have a clear definition of murder. Murder is the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought, according to Merriam-Webster online dictionary. One could question how the author of this argument logically came to the conclusion that it is our duty to murder more than one innocent person in order to save one innocent person. It does not seem to follow that instead of murdering one innocent person to prevent the murder of many other innocent people that it would be our duty to murder more than one innocent person to prevent the murder of one innocent person.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Let’s say you discovered an acquaintance of yours committed a string of violent crimes and is now going to face trail for doing so. This person committed crimes such a rape, first degree homicide, multiple forms of abuse to a small child, among others. Many of these crimes committed are ones you personally find disgusting and unforgivable. Now theoretically, if you were told to chime in on whether the suspect was to be sentenced life in prison, or sentenced to the death penalty, which would you choose? What is the first thought that comes to your mind? Think about it for a minute, I’ll wait… Personally, I’d want the criminal to feel as much pain as he caused his victims.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All throughout the media, one hears of murders and homicides. It is a crime to kill someone, but the government "murders" people all the time without thinking twice. There is a risk when pulling the trigger that this horrible fate will happen. If it is not right to kill someone, why does the government kill people all the time?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murdering is violence in any circumstance. If we kill someone who killed another man then who will kill us? All religions agreed that God gives life to human and only God has the power to take it away. In many cases victim’s relatives want to take revenge but in a modern and civilized world there is no place to hostility. “Why kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?” (The john Howard society of Ontario, March 2001, page 1).…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No I don’t think killing for any reason is ever justified be it as revenge against someone or just because you want to hurt another person.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The human rights activist argues that the death penalty is inhumane and goes against all human rights. There have been many countries that have abolished the death penalty as Capital Punishment. China, Iran, and Iraq still apply Capital Punishment for political purposes, murder, drug trafficking, adultery, and witchcraft. In total, one hundred forty countries have abolished the death penalty because some criminals are influenced by the police interviewing. They are more likely to give a false statement and because they are ill and don’t understand what happened at the actual crime. Mental health influences 5-10 percent of capital punishment cases. This information is provided by Amnesty…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Killing is wrong. It’s something that has been driven into us since childhood its indisputable truth. So why is capital punishment allowed? For those of you that don’t know what capital punishment is, it’s the death penalty the murder of a people in our society who are mentally or emotionally unstable, have anger management issues or simply made a plain mistake. These are many of the reasons that account for the homicides that take place each year, these are people that should have the chance to change yet have those chances taken away from them. Capital Punishment is just not humane and should not be legal.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certain states still allow the death penalty as an option for punishing criminals. This eye for an eye punishment has been a controversy for many years. Deciding whether or not it is morally right to take a person’s life because they took another’s life is the main issue still up for debate. The death penalty is a punishment that the court is unable to take back. In the event that the jury and judge were wrong in their decision, deciding to take falsely accused individual’s life by giving such an extreme punishment can cause a huge controversy across the nation. Therefore, the death penalty should not be an option for deciding how to accurately punish an individual.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition Essay: Murder

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Murder is considered a serious crime in our country. The loosely defined term of murder implies that a person who kills another human being with intent is known as being the worst kind of violent crime we see in our society. Any unlawful killing requires that a living person be killed and it does not mean that the guilty person feels any hatred or spite in order to plan and execute the act of murder. Moreover, the destructive acts that end peoples lives are classified as homicides which include manslaughter and first and second degree murder. More important, the justice system has put different labels on such crimes, but it also allows room for criminals to get away with murder.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays