Preview

Why Is War Is Morally Justifiable?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1084 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is War Is Morally Justifiable?
IS WAR NECESSARY?
The greatest catastrophe that can happen to human is war. It comes with death and destruction, disease and starvation, and poverty. Looking at the havoc caused in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan not many years ago, from this we can estimate the destructive effects of war. From history, war has been a recurrent phenomenon in many nations, there are wars lasting for a year even more than that (world word 2 lasted for six years). Moltse, the famous German Field Marshal, declared war to be part of the God's World-Order. War is a necessary phenomenon, it has a way of separating the weaker from the strongest. World War 2 for instance granted American the world power after they showcase their superiority over their counterpart.
…show more content…
I will in addition go on to say that it is justifiable when diplomacy alone is not enough to protect a people from their destruction at the hands of an oppressive force. The debate on war has in the recent decade broken down to "Good/bad", and "Right/Wrong". This is not an appropriate way of way of viewing one of the most important elements of humanity. First of all, war is not a yes/no, always/never decision or circumstance. It is the escalation of force past the point of diplomatic intervention. It is never the same and always totally dependent on the people involved, the cultures and history of the region as well as the resources in contention.
We can date back and view many examples of when and if war is justifiable and you will see many different examples depending on where you stand. Let's take WWII. If you were American it was completely justifiable, because we were attacked, we helped to liberate many innocent people and we won. If you were German or Japanese it wasn't because it was an act of Imperialism and destruction of a continent. If you were Polish or Chinese it was wrong because it results only in the slaughter and destruction of your
…show more content…
The occurrence of another war (1939-45), however, conclusively proved that to think of an unbroken peace is to be unrealistic and that no institution or assembly can ever ensure the permanence of peace. The League of Nations collapsed completely under the tensions and stresses created by Hitler. The United Nations Organization, with all the good work that it has been doing, is not proving as effective. A large number of wars, the most recent ones being the one in Vietnam, the other between India and Pakistan, or Indo-China war, Iran-Iraq war or Arab- Israel war, have been fought despite the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War can be defined as "an active struggle between competing entities. It's truly hard to tell who is right or wrong during a war. Both sides are fighting for what they believe in and what is true to their heart. In the end there is always two things promised – destruction and death. These two objects can explain the result in every facet of war from the physical to emotional.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wars have always brought an abundant amount of hate, sorrow, death; no matter how great is the reasoning and the obligation. Despite of all those horrible things, war have always exists like if it were part of human nature. However, when it come to comparing different wars on different time and locations, some at least seems to have more logical sense and significance when compare to others. Particularly the wars involved with United States, wars such as the fight for independence and from oppression from the British, world war one due to the German submarine attack on one of the American cargo ship, and the civil war due to separation of the north and southern states. All of these were a necessity and rational for the most part.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay 1

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some people think war is justified because; it is in order to counter terrorism. I think they're wrong because rather than war being the only solution my opinion is that war is the worse way to handle a conflict. I agree, that sometimes we are forced to do things we might not want to do, for example after the terrorist attack of September 11, it became inevitable for United States not to retaliate. It is logical and justifiable that the people, who are involved in those attacks directly or indirectly, must be captured and punished for killing more than 3000 people. However, I don't think that it makes war acceptable. In war, we intend to kill enemy troops, to get to dangerous leaders and avenge our own loss. Yet, we cannot have a violent, successful war without killing innocent people. If we are going to war to avenge the killing of our own citizens, think of what we are doing to them. We are going off and killing their innocent people, causing them the same pain we felt. Crito did not understand the madness of Socrates, Crito will do whatever it takes to help his friend to flee, instead of being exiled by the government. AI do not think that what you are doing is right, to give up your life when you can save it, and to hasten your fate as your enemies would hasten it, and indeed have hastened it in their wish to destroy you.@(Crito )…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military Ethics

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by the human race. There are many different reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party and anger burns with a fiery passion, war is the last remaining option. Obviously, the purpose of any war is to win. How are wars won? Perhaps if we were to ask a member of the Defense Department during the early stages of the war in Iraq, his answer might be, “To win this war we must force the enemy into submission by means of ethical warfare.” If we were to ask a marine in the Second World War what he was told by his commanding officer he would reply, “To close with the enemy and destroy him.” (Fussell, 763).…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is ubiquitous; there will always be one country at war with another during all the times of the year. The first recorded war was in 2700 BCE in Mesopotamia between Sumer and Elam, and the latest have been the Syrian and Iraq wars. Although there have been countless amounts of changes in warfare since 2700 BCE there will forever be a constant controversy about what good comes from war. While soldiers are risking their lives across the world civilians are at home contemplating the pros and cons of warfare. Though trauma that accompanies war is unforgivable, war is not entirely useless. Without it countries and people around the world would be taken advantage of. The destruction left behind by war is nothing in comparison to the catastrophic…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Just war is a war that is justified because it is necessary for peace to happen. Just war theory has its origins in the catholic church. In order for a war to be considered just it must meet certain criteria. For a war to be just it must: have a just cause, have a valid authority, be comparative justice, the right intention, be the last resort, have a good probability of success, and have proportionality.[1]…

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is a horrible act that is fully capable of leaving scars on innocent people at horrifying scales, and can change how we see others just by the way that they were involved. War is capable of changing the perspective of entire societies.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we think of war we think of torture, cruelty, suffering and hell. Indeed, there is no denying that war is terrible. The desire for war is generally caused by man's ego, which is part of the physical man, as opposed to the spiritual man. Physical man is another way of describing man's "human nature." Man naturally has great tendencies to do according to his desires, and has other people act in agreement to his desires, cultures, and philosophies. As a civilization of a particular culture grows, it is a part of that civilization's nature to dominate the choices of surrounding peoples, in an attempt to bring these peoples into less than one great rule. If need be, man will wage war to forcibly bring others to the awareness of a more "enlightened" way of living. The only way to truly have peace is for man to ultimately strengthen his spiritual side. When living with true virtue, man is able to have patience, understanding, tolerance, love, forgiveness, gentleness, and goodness, even in the face of fear, intolerance, hate, and anger. Self-defence is necessary, but more times than not, war are waged by men who fight against the free agency of others, and men who will the dominance and manipulation of others. This stems greatly from pride and selfishness, but it can come from any attitude that is against the spirit of true virtues, those virtues which are of God.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “War never changes.” A memorable quote in the opening of the Fallout games describes exactly how war is. It will always be the same, death of people for others benefits. There will never be an era where peace triumphs war as long as humans live if we continue with how we interact with other countries. It's not all happiness and good times when war strikes, death of thousands, even entire nations are wiped off the planet. Should we continue with war or find some other way to reason with each other?…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War occurs if one party harms another party, and people have voiced their concerns about the situation, requesting for war as kind of like a solution, after an understanding (Thucydides 1954, 69). Thucydides presents that this will yield positive outcomes because of their military competence and firm discipline in implementing commands (Thucydides 1954,…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When is war acceptable? That is the question that the Just War theory (jus bellum iustum) attempts to answer. Guided by an evolving set of criteria, this tradition attempts to provide a framework by which the both the reasons for a war and the combatants' behavior may be judged to be ethical and morally justifiable. This theory or doctrine, has roots in both philosophical and historical contexts, having been shaped by conventions and rules observed through ages of war as well as the thoughts of philosophers of those same ages. These principles are divided into two parts: 'the right to go to war' (jus ad bellum), which concerns itself with whether it is justifiable…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “War, what is it good for”? The lyrics to the 60’s pop song, provokes the question that Just War proponents and Pacifists have wrestled with throughout history, reaching opposite conclusions. Those in favor of Just War theory, say war is only good insofar as it is fought for the right reasons and brings about the right end. Whereas, Pacifists reject war completely, preferring peaceful means to resolve conflict. But which one is morally and ethically right? Which one should be adopted and practiced by the Nations of this World? Upon examining the logic and philosophical implications of each ethical stance, one is able to sympathize with them both, seeing their values and virtue.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality of War

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are nine conditions under which fighting a war can be moral. Although, that does not mean that wars are moral, especially not any of the wars this country has engaged itself in. War seems to be the most destructive type of human interaction. No other medium allows people to kill each other in such massive numbers or to cause immense suffering. Wars often take years to develop and can last for an undetermined amount of years. The effects can reverberate for decades if not centuries. For these reasons, I believe that a nation’s foreign policy should be based on moral principles.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thinking that war is always justified, usually is a thought of people in the place of power and political standpoint. This isn’t always the case, but generally when people are in a standing like this, they become power-hungry, and feel the need to invade and declare war on other countries. The belief that war is always justified is not practical, if a country decided one day that it doesn’t like the law of the age to vote in another country, does that mean they have to go to war to resolve it? More importantly, if a country has had nothing really going for it lately, but happens to…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics