Why Is The Correctional Officer Lied To The Inmate

The paradigm should be predicated upon the safety of the institution, which can be interpreted as ensuring that security functions are protected to prevent any threats to inmates, correctional staff, and the general public. Therefore, the correctional officer should ensure that their actions are in accordance with this paradigm, which is relative to interpretation in regard to any threats that are faced by the institution. In additional personal values and judgment will impact the decision-making process when there are no clear standards to guide the correctional officer's decision. In this particular scenario, which can result in different interpretations regarding the correct course of action to take.
Therefore, because the inmate was involved
Therefore, the question that can only be asked is whether this violated the professional code of ethics for correctional officers and as I stated in the previous paragraph if security functions are compromised, the correctional officer's primary objective is to protect the facility. Therefore, lying could be justified as the correctional officer may have been unable to coerce the inmate to reveal where the contraband was located without lying to him. So the bottom line here is that in the scenario it does not state what type of contraband that was being confined but in the prison system, all contraband is considered illegal and is considered to be a danger to all
In this scenario, the correctional officer lied to obtain the information he wanted, and if this was universally acceptable behavior, there would never be an ability to discern between who was telling the truth or lying as people would lie for personal gain while engaging in contradictions on their statements that were made to obtain what they wanted. The person lied to would suffer the consequences of any lie, and this was the case in this scenario. (Daniel,