Preview

Why Is The Civil War Necessary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Civil War Necessary
I believe the civil war was necessary. Without it we may have never taken the necessary steps to achieve freedom for the slaves. The southerns would never have given up there ways of life peacefully. There are many events of the time period that support my claim. The first example is the caning of Charles Summner. This is when Preston Brooks, a pro-slavery southern senator, attacked and beat Charles Sumner on the senate floor. This was after Brooks gave an Anti-slavery speech. The speech did attack the family of Brooks, but it nonetheless shows how far even a “civilized” southern may go to defend his family, honor, and traditions. Praises supporting brooks’s actions came pouring in from all over the south. Many even sent him new canes to replace the one that broke during the beating. This proves that many southerners shared brooks’s radical view of slavery, and like brooks would fight to keep it. Another example of why slavery would never have ended without war is the bleeding Kansas event. This was a succession of battles between pro and anti-slavery people. But the events were all …show more content…
This was when Dred Scott, an African American slave who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. This was an important decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court said that African Americans could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States. The Supreme Court hoped this would set a precedent and end the slavery debate forever. This is an example of how even if the United States would have tried to just sign a bill to end slavery, the supreme court may have just said it was unconstitutional and vetoed it using the checks and balances

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Civil war in America was inevitable from the beginning. A country can not partake in slavery without an uproar. Tensions were high between the north and the south already because of their different ways of life. The north focused on mass production whereas the south’s biggest trade was agriculture. Slavery allowed the south to prosper, their whole economy was based off of it. Though change was inevitable two documents that sped up the war process were the Fugitive Slave Act and Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That’s maybe the reason why people abolitionist, because they felt betrayed that their own country would punish innocent people. And because the government could not make a decision, the Civil war did for them. The war did not only change one thing, it changed everything. Although much controversy occurred, at last there was something to put the conflict to an end.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott vs Sanford was a very important political case and was one of the first case towards equal rights for everybody. Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri and he sued the state of Missouri for his freedom. In this time Missouri was a free state and therefore he stated that he could be free from slavery. Although he was free, the state of Missouri considered him property and could not be taken away from his owner. Not to mention Minorities in this time we're not considered citizens and couldn't have freedom if they were a slave.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Dred Scott Supreme Court decision is an embarrassment in American history. Before the the case was brought to the court Dred Scott,an enslaved African American, tried to buy his freedom for $300 but the offer was declined. He finally went to the court to see if his freedom could be granted through the legal system. However he lost on a technicality because he could not provide sufficient proof that he was owned by Emerson’s widow. In 1850 there was a retrial in the Missouri supreme court, which granted them freedom. However two years later the Supreme court stepped in and reversed that ruling. He finally appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that because he was black he was not a citizen, in effect he restricted, or…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion stated that because of Dred Scott’s race he was not a citizen and had no right to sue under the Constitution, in March of 1857. Stretching beyond the case of the moment, the court’s decision also invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that had for nearly 40 years placed restrictions on slavery north of the parallel 36 degrees, 30 minutes, in the vast territory of the Louisiana Purchase. Scott’s abolitionist lawyers might have hoped for a landmark decision but not the one they got. The Supreme Court’s ruling galvanized the abolition movement and spurred Abraham Lincoln to publicly speak out against it, the event that led to the resurgence of his personal political career.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Dred Scott v. Sandford the case started in 1856 and ended in 1857. “The Supreme Court decided that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.” - Alex McBride (McBride 2006, 411). The verdict was unlawful and absurd.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talks about the significance and background of the Dred Scott case. In fact this actually hurt the cause of anti-slavery because now, slavery could spread into the free states. Now, the free states laws that used to create this safe haven for the fugitive slaves, now no longer have any power because the Constitution, debatably the strongest document the United States has, contradicts any law protecting slaves. This is because the United States Constitution protects all property of the individual, and slaves to the southern people in the 1850’s thought of slaves as property.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason why the Civil War was started and fought.Slavery was the overall reason…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, the Supreme Court decided the African people, whether free or slave, were not considered American citizens, and didn’t have the right to sue someone in federal court. During this case, the Court ruled that Congress didn’t have the power to ban slavery in territories. They also declared that the rights of slaveowners were protected by the Fifth Amendment in the Constitution. This is because slaves in their times were not considered people, they were considered as property.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War DBQ

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One reason the Civil War was caused by the societal tensions about slavery. There were two documents that fit this category and those were Document G by Frederick Douglass and Document L by Roger…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To conclude, the Civil War was an unavoidable occurrence in the history of the United States. With both sides unwilling to compromise or to find a settlement that pleased them both, there was no other option. If each side had been a…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most significant cause of the American Civil War was the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln. Because of Abraham Lincoln’s views on slavery, the emancipation proclamation, and the formation of different parties, the Civil War began. With Lincoln’s views opposed to slavery, it caused a lot of disagreement with some of the states. Abe believed that blacks should have equal rights, and that they should be treated the same as everyone else. He tried to stop the spreading of slavery and to try to put an end to it all together. He released a document called the Emancipation Proclamation. In it, he gives several million slaves freedom. He aims the document towards the south. It did…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The causes and effects of the Civil War above were a very important part in American history. If the war didn’t happen, we would still have slavery, we wouldn’t have the modern weaponry or medicine that we have today, and we would still be living the way that people did in the 1860’s. This war helped shape our country forever. Thanks to the war, you can be who you are right…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays