Preview

Why Is Star Wars Better Than Star Trek

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
432 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Star Wars Better Than Star Trek
I think Star Wars is better than Star Trek. Why? It’s simple. Star Trek is for wimps! Yes, I said it. WIMPS! Star Trek is an old television show that is about a society traveling through outer space on the Starfleet Enterprise and takes place in the distant future. Not a lot happens and there isn’t a lot of action. In other words, there isn’t a lot of fighting and intensity. Star Wars is high intensity and loaded with actions! It is full of colorful characters and you watch it on the big screen. Just the way I like it.
Star Wars is better than Star Trek. Star Wars has a whole army of clones. I feel like Start Trek has limited cast. Star trek has less weaponry. Star Trek also has less vehicle types. I like a lot of weapons and vehicles in science fiction movies and television. Star Wars gives us more action packed scenes and a more diverse selection of vehicles and weaponry and characters. I also think Star Trek is a bit more realistic and Star Wars is true fantasy. Like I said before, that’s just the way I like it.
…show more content…
For instance, in Star Trek they have phasers, pulse, torpedo weapons, and shields. While Star Wars has light sabers, ion cannons, shields, laser canons and blasters. Also, Star Wars offers different varieties of these weapons depending on the movie. I’ve been told that fans of Star Trek get more into Star Trek, in other words they are a little weird and more committed. For example, I’ve seen pictures of people getting plastic surgery to get their ears to look like Spock? Um, excuse me? This is much more fanatical than fans of Star Wars, which I don’t understand why that is. Star Wars is just cooler in my

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lightsaber In A New Hope

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The lightsaber was one of the most powerful weapons in all of the Star Wars universe. This weapon was wielded by only the Jedi and their Sith counterparts. It was used in battle and was superior to all it came into contact with. The lightsaber was seen a great deal of times throughout the first movie, “A New Hope.” It represented the talisman in Luke Skywalker’s quest for victory over the evil Darth Vader. This lightsaber was a major part of the film, for it would symbolized three key points in the story. Power, vengeance, and peace.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Star Wars vs Star Trek is a rivalry that has been going on since 1977 when Star Wars released A New Hope in theaters. Although Trekkies seem to believe that Star Trek is better than Star Wars, they would be wrong. Star Wars The Force Awakens broke the box office record and has a net worth of $1.783 billion, while Star Trek’s highest net worth is only $282 million. Darth Vader is the greatest cinematic villain of all time, bar none. Star Trek's Khan was, in all fairness, one of the best as well. But a plastic-chested, Shakespeare-quoting Ricardo Montalban or venom-spewing Benedict Cumberbatch can't hold a lightsaber to Vader. Star Wars also has better weapons, Star Wars’ lightsaber, a pulsating beam of light that is a sword that slices through…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Epic of Gilgamesh vs. Star wars The Epic of Gilgamesh and Star wars at first glance seem as though they are polar opposites. One is a journey through space and the other is a journey for everlasting life. Vaguely these stories are very different but when looked at closely they share a lot of the same themes and concepts.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2001 A Space Odyssey Summary

    • 2958 Words
    • 12 Pages

    As our knowledge of the universe expands, so does our imagination. Today’s science fiction movies, such as Interstellar, are based on new discoveries and research that older movies, such as 2001: A Space Odyssey, did not have. However, both movies stayed true to science, etc…

    • 2958 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another important aspect of both games is combat. Minecraft is a 3D game, and Terraria is 2D, so naturally the actual combat feel of Minecraft is better. However, Minecraft doesn't have nearly as many mobs or bosses as Terraria. Terraria has fifteen bosses currently in use. Minecraft has two. Terraria has too many hostile mobs to name at this point, and Minecraft has nineteen currently in use. So point for both games, as Terraria has more pontential battles and Minecraft has the 3D aspect that gives a better…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    that better because of the fact that it makes the movies entertaining. I like the action,…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hero's Journey

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages

    inspiration for his groundbreaking films. Lucas also believes that Star Wars is such a popular…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I prefer the book more than the cartoon because you get to use your own imagination. I liked it better because the book was more detailed and it was more…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For over 30 years the world has been infatuated with that one galaxy far, far away. A galaxy that somehow always seems to be in turmoil, and yet is a place that we all wouldn't mind living in. Star Wars has been apart of my life from as far back as I can remember. When I was 5-years-old I was asked what I wanted to be when I grew up. I distinctly remember saying that I wanted to be a Jedi Knight, and fly the Millennium Falcon. Not very realistic goals, I know, but it was the truth. Eventually, I did grow up and I had to look for real job, but my fascination and love for Star Wars still remained.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Battlefield is pleasing those who wish to know what it means to experience war. So here are reasons why Battlefield is a better game than Call of Duty by my opinions. In Battlefield there is vehicles that include tanks, APC’s, helicopters, and jets. All of these can be used at any time during the match types. COD has kill streaks but very little. In Battlefield matches like conquest really rely on handful of players depend on the vehicles at their deposal. Battlefield have accurate hit detection. I hate COD’s hit detection. Battlefield has more visually immersive graphics than COD. All thanks to Dice’s Frostbite Engine. Activison’s developers coming up with an engine more powerful anytime soon. The best part in Battlefield for me is the destruction and how you have to play and communicate as a team. Activision developers and Treyarc have been finding ways to use this on their engine but it’s not the…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life of Pi Analysis

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I felt the book was better as it offered much more than the movie. It was more detailed, more religious and more specific about events. The movie on the other hand focuses on the beauty and the special effects. The book uses careful and cleverly crafted language to reveal Pi's unique perspective.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fck You

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly I think ‘Harry Potter and the Goblet of fire book is better than the movie because the book has a more interesting feel to it, as you are enabled to use your imagination to create a more dramatic and captivating story that would suit you. But quite the opposite of this, the movie is basically a straightforward and easily understandable film but is shown in only the perspective of the producers.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    And what are the main differences between books and adaptations? Films have limited time, whereas books can be lengthy, so books can develop more of a plot and characterization. A classic complaint about movie versions concerns the omission of material that the reader finds important. If the director must make a film that is the proper length for a theatrical release, there is no way to include everything, especially when it comes from a long novel. Some people consider this an advantage of adaptations; others, on the contrary, find it a great disadvantage. Here are two opinions of people discussing Peter Jackson’s Fellowship of the Ring in the comments on “WiseGEEK” website. Anon272367 writes: “Imagine, for example, a “Fellowship of the Ring” [sic] movie that covered every single damn detail in the book. Trust me when I say this: I wouldn 't watch it” (Better). His opponent, anon260109, writes: “Jackson 's ear was deaf to Tolkien 's elaborately crafted back story of ancient mysteries and he threw away their music, not realising that the books are unlike any other fantasy novel in that they were written by a man who constructed them on an intimate knowledge of the Old English language, mythology and storytelling” (Better).…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the creative side of the issue an action flick highly relies on suspense and thrill whereas a romantic film seeks attraction in provoking feelings and sentiments in its audience. It usually is said that action movies are stupid. Although this statement is correct in many cases it cannot be generalized as an eminent fact. If cinema’s history has taught us one thing, it is the fact you can make an excellent film in any genres. Just take a look Bourne trilogy as an example; based on Robert Ludlom’s books, they are among the most (not to say the most) pivotal action films of our time. They simply influenced other directors/producers on how to shoot and edit a car chase scene, how to make a brutal fight scene. It is commonly believed that making an action is an easier task to do than making anything else, namely a romantic one. This is not entirely true. Both need a certain set of equipments, certain sets of skills in makers. What makes them dissimilar or similar is vision, the way the writer sees the world that he/she creates. A film can be hardcore action and at the same time has a romantic arc in it and vice versa. So we can say they are off springs of the same family and just like any siblings have their characteristics, differences and similarities and it is pretty much wrong to compare them as two individual…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    English

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There’s been a lot of comparison about “Bing Bang theory” to “how I met your mother” about how the show is better and funnier than “how I met your mother”. To that, I say rubbish! How I met your mother is ironic and unique show that has not copied any other show, unlike Bing bang theory. A wise man once said Original is 100…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics