Why Is Robert Harris Wrong

Robert Harris was an irrational and wild killer. However, I do not believe that he was utterly conscious of his actions, nor was his brain fully functional, and so do his actions and reactions demonstrate. Robert Harris can be said to be psychologically unstable, thanks to the environment he was raised in. Yet, why do we kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong?
In my opinion, the parents are liable to his actions and doings. They are liable for the monster that they have created. As years of psychological research prove that children that are not raised in a warm and loving environment, but rather in a family of violence, usually, they end up being just like their parents, with high chances of being killers and serial murderers. Those people, like Robert try to let off steam and act the same way their parents did, using violence.
People who are psychologically unstable, usually tend to try to compensate for their past. For example, Harris’ last meal consisted of Kentucky fried chicken pieces, two pieces, Pepsi and jelly beans. Most often, people in Harris’ situation tend to think of the best or the fanciest food they can eat. However, as Harris’ past was based around crime, his meal reflects the need to compensate for the fun of the teenage years, that he spent in jail. The baker and Mayeski might have lost a
Thump… The mouth starts to gurgle, as fluid starts to erupt. This is the sound of death. I believe that the death penalty is nothing but a true reflection of how, even though we think we have revolutionized and developed, the impact is not as profound. We are still blinded by our animal instincts. In addition, ‘an eye for an eye only ends up making the world blind’-Mahatma Ghandi, killing each other is not only inhumane,but rather provokes more killing. Harris’ death penalty was the first in 25 years in the state of California, which logically, resulted in the comfort and aggravation in using the death