Why Is Recent Evidence Stronger Than Older Evidence

This question refers to knowledge that is recent and old. It acknowledges that both can be credible, but asks whether recent evidence is stronger than older evidence. This is an important question because it is vital to modern ways of thinking. It helps people decide how they should use evidence in accordance with their search for truth. This question can be discussed with reference to many different areas of knowledge. The two areas that will be addressed in this essay are natural sciences and history. The way that it will be discussed in reference to natural sciences is how some diseases were thought to have been contracted a certain way, but in more recent years, those ways have been proven false. The way that it will be discussed in reference
It shows that this evidence is inevitably stronger because it is a more logical explanation of how the contractions happen. This is also shown with all of this new technology and information; much of the evidence we find can be analyzed and reviewed much better. Another example of how more recent evidence is strongest is how many doctors thought that rabies was not curable at all many years ago, but now several different patients who had rabies have been cured. If the doctor had evidence that was not recent, they would say that our knowledge knows that rabies is not curable, and each person who contracts it will die. But now, if they have recent evidence, they would say that they know that rabies is curable, and due to new medicines and treatments, rabies is curable in some patients. A counterargument to this is how acupuncture has been around for thousands of years, and it still helps with healing. This shows that the older evidence of the practice of acupuncture is still useful today, and it has still not been fully taken over by modern medicines and treatments. History shows that recent evidence is inevitably the strongest evidence because more recent documents have more analysis and research put into