Preview

Why Is Poaching Bad

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
436 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Poaching Bad
I was going to the library as usual, I was reading a happy animal book and then I find a poaching paragraph and slowly that good happy feeling sank into a dark scary feeling as the truth comes out, what is going on, what is happening to our animals in the world. What is poaching? What makes this bad? It is not what makes it bad it is why it's bad. It is bad because it is illegal, it is illegal because it is killing innocent animals, it is animal cruelty. Poaching is not only illegal but is cruel to animals, but is only illegal in government bought land, land owned by the government. The only reason why people started poaching is because tiger pelt and elephant tusks are good money in the BLACK MARKET. Poaching is increasing directly and helping criminal gangs become better at shootings and makes them more sophisticated. Terrorists are starting to sell ivory tusks to get more money to get more weapons and support their own terror. …show more content…
Wolves in yellowstone when wolves in yellowstone were taken away the elk started to over graze on the willow and that was affecting the beavers, so the beavers started dieing off. Since the tiger is an apex predator in many ecosystems it would be a catastrophe if they go extinct, unlike lions the tiger lives in the (jungle, rainforest, savanna, etc.)Since the tiger is at the top of the food chain for most ecosystems it is a primary apex predator and will have the most effect if extinct. Unlike the lions who only roam one or two ecosystems will have very little effect on the ecosystem. According to HUFFINGTON POST they sold over 6,000 animal killing licences, this gave people the power to kill innocent animals with no penalty for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lastly, there is a positive impact on Yellowstone from a doubling of the wolf population. We would see a huge increase of water animals, birds, bears, and etcetera. Without the elk, bees and other birds would have more flowers for pollination and food. Without any elks to erode the river banks, the water animals would flourish and would inherit clean homes and we might see them increase in number. Without the elk, the bears would have more berries so that they could build up fat so they can hibernate.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scared To Death Summary

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ed Yong's article, "Scared to Death", describes how returning wolves to Yellowstone affected the elk population's patterns and behaviors. Many people believe that the fear of being eaten is what drives animals away. However, this theory is not completely true. The Yellowstone elk population was thriving, but the wolves' return impacted it on many different levels.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of the rare species being poached by Transnational Organized Crime groups are endanger of being wiped off the face of the planet forever. Government corruption, weak laws, and next to no punishment for poaching allows for these crimes to continue around the world. For Crime groups the risk is low and rewards are high, especially when the poachers are poor locals, which are typically the persons jailed for the offenses. Poachers do many things to an environment when they over harvest plants and animals that can have divesting impacts across that area. The altering of livelihoods of the locals who can depend on the plants and animals poached for their own survival where they live. The poaching can have massive effects on other species that live and breathe in those eco-systems which in turn can have wider effects on nature. The introduction of wildlife into an eco-system can be invasive toward other species. “For example pet Burmese pythons let loose by their owners are now considered a major pest in Florida’s everglades.” (2015). And lastly, the killing of other species, incidentally, while targeting endangered species can affect…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trophic Cascade Essay

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the wolves were reintroduced it began to restore the trophic cascade. The reduced browsing because of the altered behavior allowed increase in the recruitment of woody plants like Aspen (Populus tremuloides) and willow (Salix spp.) (Ripple and Beschta 2012). Without the elk decimating woody plants populations they were able to regenerate. This resulted in an increase in multiple species native to the park. These species included bison (Bison bison), beaver (Castor canadensis), and bears (Ursus arctos). The relative abundance and richness of 6/7 species of songbirds also increased because of the increased recruitment (Ripple and Beschta 2012). The wolves also have a positive effect on the age/sex structure. By concentrating on calves and older females they consistently eliminate the older sicker elk that are less suitable to survive. The wolves rarely prey on females in their reproductive prime or full grown males. The reintroduction has also had a positive effect on the bison population. The elk and bison share 80% of the same browsing food source. As elk are driven from their preferred browsing areas the bison are able to exploit the areas with the most nutritional…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fortunately, around this time in the 70’s, American’s were starting to become much more aware of their impact on the environment and the wildlife. The Endangered Species Act was created in 1973, and the Grey Wolf was put on the list in 1974. After almost 35 years of restoration efforts and conservation work, the Grey Wolf has finally been taken off the endangered species list in Minnesota, with…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The downfall to poaching is that it could cause hunting to be banned and this will lower the rate of outdoorsmen. This means that all the men and women that usually buy their hunting license would not buy their hunting license anymore. The result of the rate of people buying hunting license dropping would be that the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife would be losing money. If the Wildlife department loses money this could result in several animal parks and hunting places being shut down.The banning of hunting could be both good and bad for the people. In (Kentucky white Tailed Deer Report) they state that the banning of hunting could be good for the people because this would make the serious hunters want to help catch people that are poaching and report them to the fish and wildlife department.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s important to recognize how much of this goes on because animals play an important role in our world. To make them suffer even more than they already have to is outrageous. “Inhumane Suffering One of the most controversial aspects of hunting is the prospect that an animal may be suffering from a long and painful death,” one article says while talking about this specific issue. It comes to show that animals are greatly affected when hunters kill them. Another article heavily discusses Cecil’s death saying, “the killing of Cecil has sparked an international outcry and a backlash against big game trophy hunting.” Cecil was a lion in Zimbabwe who was the hot topic for his death and is the perfect example of the suffering of animals because he was one of many animals who experienced a death from this…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The illegal ivory trade has skyrocketed in recent years. Decreasing the demand for ivory is essential. Never buy, sell, or wear ivory. Write to your politicians to speak out against poaching. (Americans can write a letter to the Secretary of State on the Wildlife Conservation Society website.) For information on organizations that combat the illegal ivory trade, see National Geographic’s page, Blood Ivory: How to Help.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actually, those species are vital in the Yellowstone environment. For instance, Gray wolves were reintroduced after being extinct in Yellowstone in the 1900s as farmers complained about the damage Gray wolves did to their livestock. After removal of wolves, Yellowstone elk began to overpopulate due to a lack of their natural enemies, causing vegetation to vanish there, affecting animals like rabbits, mice, and much more, which depend on that vegetation. Decreased number of those herbivore endangered carnivore, such as coyotes and foxes, as well. Just a removal of wolves by humans has brought the ecosystem out of balance. However, the bright side is that, since reintroduction of Gray wolves in 1995, the ecosystem in Yellowstone National Park is showing some recovery, telling us that it may not be too late and humans may be able to correct what they have done against the Mother Nature. The history of Yellowstone National Park tells us that we humans can easily destroy the ecosystem but a recovery effort is possible and worth to…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sanctifying The Wolf

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Is the Wolf a Real American Hero?, Middleton writes that wolves didn't fix Yellowstone, and the trophic cascade believed to have been caused by wolves is false. Studies conducted in the 1990's showed that aspens and willows were regrowing, but follow-up studies showed that despite the 60 percent elk reduction, trees hadn't regrown. A Colorado State University study, focused on willows, determined that too much damage had been done for wolves to undo. Without wolves, elk increased, elk reduced willows, without willows, beavers declined, without beavers, rivers deepened and the water tables dropped below the root level of willows. Focusing on wolves as the savior of Yellowstone detracts from other…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effects Of Grizzly Bears

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Parks Canada provides an estimate of 20,000 Grizzly bears in Canada (regions included: British Columbia, Western Alberta, the Yukon and North Western Territories) (2014). But, a recent study by Sawaya et al. (2012) has suggested that Grizzly Population is already in decline in some parts of Canada such as Banff National Park and the numbers presented by Government of Canada are lower than the reality. Furthermore, The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada cites them as species of special concern (2012). Amid all this, conflicts with humans can make this situation even worse as they can induce human caused mortality of Grizzly bears. Stakeholders have taken actions and measures to address the issue of Human – Grizzly bear conflict; however, no compelling results have been seen so far. Some actions such as aversive conditioning and hunting ends up hurting the population further; thus, contradicting the inherent nature of both conservation biology and animal welfare science. It is evident that Grizzly bear – Human conflict causes significant harm to the animals, and actions taken to resolve this issue are proving to be ineffective. Therefore, for successful results a paradigm shift must be undertaken to focus on conservation and welfare equally.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolf Reintroduction

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over time Yellowstone National Park have undergone factors that have destroyed their wolf population. With this decline, or as others say habitual extinction, individuals began to understand the importance that these animals (1) had on a working ecosystem. In 1975 the wolf reintroduction process to Yellowstone began, however, it is still going on today due to it being such an extensive course of action.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many majestic animals have been the targets for poachers, and poachers, being the dumb people they are, don’t know the difference between animals they can and can’t hunt, and end up making them extinct! Hunting is interfering with nature, and at this rate, we will continue to make many species extinct! Some may see hunting as a way of removing overpopulated animals, but there are none of those right now! Hunting not only hurts animals, but it will end up hurting ourselves as well!…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reintroduction of Wolves

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wolves are highly adaptable and very necessary for our ecosystem. This controversial yet compelling animal was once naturally living in most of North America gracing the environment with its presence. The wolf is a symbol of wilderness and freedom, but unfortunately for hunters in the early 19th century, the wolf would become a hunting game, leading to extinction in United States. One of the main concerns of wolf reintroduction was the unbalanced ecosystem that began to flourish as an outcome of the main predator, taking its toll on other creatures and overall unsustainably in all of Yellowstone National Park. It wasn’t until mid-1990’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) with the help of scientists and biologists, advocated for a wolf reintroduction program within the Endangered Species Act. This was the first step to successfully begin the rebalancing the ecosystem by bringing back the wolves in Yellowstone National Park. (Region) This was a wildly controversial idea to the surrounding neighbors of the park, being the second main concern to the issue of reintroduction. With a lot of effort and research, in 1995 the wolves from Canada were relocated to the park where they thrived and the population grew successfully. A journey of hope and fear, lasting nearly two decades of careful examination on impacts of reintroduction was finally flourishing. Thus creating a lasting impact on our ecosystem and building confidence in wildlife and resource management.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year 1926, the grey wolves were eliminated from the Yellowstone are. This is because they are dangerous predators that can’t be controlled, they are not the native grey wolves and they are causing the elk population to plummet and disappear slowly.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays