Preview

Why Is Legal Representation Important In Australia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Legal Representation Important In Australia
Legal representation is used for a defendant to advise and present their case in court. So when a defendant cannot afford to hire or find the proper legal representation of a solicitor or barrister legal aid can be an option offered by the criminal justice system. The Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 (NSW) provides the legal representation or assistance to a defendant who is economically and socially disadvantaged. The purpose of the Legal Aid Commission, through the guidance of the act in place ensures to improve everyone having access to justice by contributing towards the cost of a private lawyer or providing the legal representation needed.
There are limitations to what allows a person to be able to access legal aid. A defendant must be means tested to determine their eligibility. This is achieved by assessing the defendant’s income and assets that ascertains if they have the financial
…show more content…
When being questioned a suspect under the age of 18 has the right to have a responsible adult present with them. In Australia, the accused has the right to a fair trial and is encouraged to have adequate legal representation to ensure justice for them. The offer of legal aid improves this right giving the access for a defendant to receive a fair trial by contributing to the cost of a lawyer or providing the legal representative.A limited police power relates to interviewing an accused if they are aged under 18 years which is displayed in Tang’s case. The rights and special protections of young people are different to adults. In the Tang case Tang was aged 17 and had no adult present when interviewed by Police at the time of the murder. This led to Tang later being granted retrials due to the fact that he was a juvenile at the time of providing his statement without being in the presence of an adult or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The criminal justice system has come a long way in providing Due Process for all defendants. Amongst all the opinions, one thing runs the same; each and every defendant must be provided adequate representation for their criminal cases. Whether or not the client can provide their own, legal assistance must be provided as to ensure the defendant’s rights are protected. The right to adequate counsel should never be a luxury only affluent people can provide, but thanks to the Sixth Amendment, every citizen has a right…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Semple, J. & Woody, W. (2011). Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roper V Simmons

    • 1620 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Christopher Simmons, who was seventeen years old, and two of his friends by the name of Charles Benjamin (fifteen years old) and John Tessmer (sixteen years old) had a detailed conversation about committing a murder. Christopher Simmons had a premeditated plan, which included, burglary (breaking and entering), robbery and murder. Simmons wanted to bond and tie the victim and discard her off the bridge. Simmons convinced his two friends that they would not be convicted for these acts because they are still considered juveniles “under the age of eighteen”.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Depending on the crime that a minor has committed, a jury or judge should choose to try the person as an adult. For example, Lionel Tate, who was twelve, beat a 6 year old girl to death while wrestling. Lionel Tate is a person that Marjie Lundstrom used in her article; “Kids Are Kids - Until They Commit Crimes”. That happened because television had influenced a young boy. That doesn't make him a murderer, but yet he…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the ages of one to fifteen the murder would have to be a very clear intention of murder to try the child as an adult. No one person's crime is the same as another, therefore no one should be tried the same. Minors, depending on their situation could be tried as adults. Children going through adolescence have emotional instability, me being a child going through this phase represent an example. The way I might react to something is going to different than the way someone else would, this is because no two people are alike.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a recent Supreme Court ruling from the case of J.D.B. v. North Carolina established age is a factor that must be considered during a police interrogation (Mears, 2011). Furthermore, J.D.B. was a thirteen-year-old special needs student, and a burglary suspect, who was questioned by the police at school. Additionally, J.D.B. was not provided Miranda warnings before the police began interrogation (Mears, 2011). The Supreme Court determined that a child in placed in the situation would feel compelled to answer police questions, whereas an adult would feel free to leave (Mears, 2011). Since we possess a general background of the case let us further examine some additional key facts and issues beginning with was interrogation considered custodial.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper, I will look at current scholarly thought to determine the effectiveness of trying juveniles as adults in a court of law. In extreme instances, juveniles of a broad range of ages have committed violent crimes that the criminal justice system has determined to be impossible to have been committed by the accepted frame of mind of a juvenile. These juveniles were tried in adult court and sentenced accordingly. The purpose of my research is to examine juveniles who have been tried as adults and to discuss its strengths and weaknesses. I will analyze the information that I gather and will provide a strong case that this practice is appropriate. Many people believe that some crimes are so terrible that the courts should focus on the type of offense and not on the age of the accused.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If juvenile are tried one as an adult and then juveniles will be tried as an adult in all cases. In a few cases, such as a murder or rape, the assumption is that a juvenile should be tried as an adult unless the trial court rules that the case should be sent to juvenile court. Some states have laws that require a youth’s case to be tried in adult court these laws usually based this automatic transfer on the youth’s age, the seriousness or type of crime, and the juvenile’s prior record.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many juveniles in the United States are being tried as adults. “Age can shape every aspect of a capital case,”(54) stated Adam Liptak in” Supreme Court to Rule on Executing Youth Killers”. Teenagers as well as kids have the ability to commit an adult crime. In the Article “A Portrait of a Child Who Murdered” by Gitta Sereny ten year old Mary Bell murdered her friend’s eight year old brother and skinned his genital area with a pair of scissors. She then abandoned his body by a brick wall and covered him with leaves and branches. Youth and kids commit crimes, do to the way they think, what they watch on TV, read in books and the internet.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Encourages the young person’s family to support them, it allows the young person to contribute to an outcome plan, it enables an opportunity for restoration to the family, the community and others. The use of appropriate development dynamics can impact young person’s thinking and behaviour with consideration to their age and allow compensation to the victim (Government of Victoria, 2010). The procedure of group conferencing is beneficial to the young person’s family because it facilitates an effective contribution when the decision-making and planning process takes place, sharing responsibility when supporting the young person with other members of his/her support network. Examining the effect of the young person’s offending on their family. The process benefits the victim/s as it allows for dynamic cooperation in the justice process, enables victims to benefit from compensation when appropriate, consulting with victims in a respectable manner and non-adversarial manner.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eassy

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Adolescence and the death penalty, two words more commonly seen together as of late. With growing number of young adult being tried and sentenced as adults for violent crimes the question rises why did they commit does age matter to the jury when they are put on trial?…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cases are allocated depending on age from the juvenile justice system to the criminal justice system. A "child" or "juvenile" meaning any person who is under the age of eighteen is placed by default in the juvenile justice system. Therefore, after defendants turn eighteen their cases fall under the criminal justice system unless convicted under the Youthful Offender act. Offender classification is the most significant phase in criminal proceedings as it can drastically change your punishment. Children as soon as the age of thirteen, may be classified under the Youthful Offender depending on the severity of the crime. Once a defendant is classified as a juvenile they are not tried in the criminal justice system. Significantly, Juveniles have…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining whether a juvenile is identified as a child or an adult is quite simple. If a juvenile is under the age of 18 then he or she is not an adult and if a juvenile has graduated from high school then he or she is identified as an adult. I believe that if a juvenile has not developed a certain level of intelligence or has not emotionally developed then they can’t be identified as an adult. In addition to that, although juveniles may have developed the sense of knowing right from wrong they may not know what’s right from wrong in the “adult world.” There have been laws passed to permitting juveniles to be transferred to adult court. The process with transferring juveniles to adult courts starts with the seriousness of the offense committed by the juvenile. If a juvenile has committed an offense such as armed robbery or murder then without a doubt there aren’t any excuses for…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Disadvantages Of Juveniles

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A child, defined as a person under age 18, can be tried as an adult only if the child was age 14 or older at the time of the offense. Nearly all juvenile cases begin in juvenile court with a felony charge. The court must conduct hearings and make certain determinations before the child can be transferred to another court for trial. For a juvenile case to be transferred to an adult criminal court, it has…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics